This will always be something to debate - recording order vs. album sequence. But: The first issues were singles, so programming after A and B sides would be just as plausible. Consider recordings first issued on 10 inch LPs - hardly anyone has them, but often they were the first albums and tracks re-sequenced for 12 inch LP issue.
I think there are two types of buyers: Those who want to re-experience something connected to the album they first bought, and those with a more systematic or curious approach.
I once listened to Charles recordings in recording order, no matter whether it was R & B or Jazz, and his development as an artist in these parallel artistic streams seemed more clear to me in chronological order.
The feeling of the sessions with Milt Jackson, e.g., comes through better with the sesions intact with stable rhythm sections.
What I was more concerned about when I saw that box in a shop earlier this week was whether that record player actually worked. The guy in the shop told me that you could cook your meals on it, too .....