Jump to content

Larry Kart

Moderator
  • Posts

    13,205
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

Everything posted by Larry Kart

  1. Perhaps -- I'll look again -- but if so, just on that brief high-note passage. The soloist is Doc Severinsen.
  2. Too bad we don't see Briggs' whole body, but still, his interactions with the music! Also, check under his name on YouTube and there's a clip of him as a kid dancing in a Stepin Fetchit short. It's brief, but wow -- it's like he's floating above the ground.
  3. Loved it since it first came out. Not trying to start something, but it sure shows up Wynton's orchestral "masterpieces."
  4. Agree with most of Larry's post but ask if the Stern/Rose is the old mono. Curious. I like Walter's later stereo recording with Francescatti and much is out of tune. I would also add the Heifitz/Reiner collaboration to the violin concerto sweepstakes. The stereo CBS, Bruno Walter Brahms symphonies are of interest as well. I meant the old mono Stern/Rose/Walter from 1954, but I listened again and scratch that. I must have been going on memories of the LP, because my CD transfer (on one of of two three-disc sets of early Stern recordings) is horribly congested and shrill, much more so than anything else there, including stuff recorded well before that performance; maybe the master tape had deteriorated. In any case, I'll sub a wonderful version I'd forgotten about -- Jacques Thibaud and Pablo Casals with Alfred Cortot conducting from 1929. Lithe and passionate as hell, with Cortot more than holding up his end, it's a better engineered/balanced recording too.
  5. I got the Eugen Jochum mid-1950s Brahms symphony set at Chuck's suggestion when it was reissued on DG Originals (it's still available) and have never regretted it. Marvelous, expansive (for want of a better term) performances. No less marvelous IMO (and the Alpha to Jochum's Omega) is Felix Weingartner's late 1930s Brahms set -- fierce living X-Rays of the works. I have this in a EMI GROC box and it seems to be OOP in that form, at least in the U.S.; can't vouch for the several transfers that are available now. Violin Concerto -- Szigeti with Harty or Ginette Neveu with Dobrowen or Milstein with Jochum (first two vintage performances in mono, last in stereo). Double Concerto -- Oistrakh/Fournier with Galleria or Stern/Rose with Walter And don't forget the magical Horn Trio! For that, I've got an odd one that I love -- Peter Damm, Josef Suk, and Werner Genuit on Acanta, coupled with the two Clarinet Sonatas. I say odd because Damm, First Horn of the Dresden Staatskapelle, has a very Central European tone, fairly rich in expressive vibrato/shadings, which will drive some people nuts but fits what Brahms had in mind, I believe. Another great one is Myron Bloom, Rudolf Serkin, and Michael Tree on a Music from Marlboro Columbia LP, perhaps on CD now, I hope.
  6. Love this one: http://www.cduniverse.com/search/xx/music/...os+Ensemble.htm and it's as cheap as the Naxos (plus you get a fine performance of the Mozart).
  7. Given your taste for the Brahms/Schoenberg, you might want to check out Paul Dessau's similiar in spirit, though at times more openly playful/antic, setting for orchestra of Mozart's String Quintet, K. 614: http://www.hbdirect.com/album_detail.php?pid=253087 It gets farther out as it goes along, and a reasonable person might decide that both Dessau and the work were insane. To me, it's fascinating, and I'm sure that Dessau knew exactly what he was up to here in every respect --- but then my own mental stability is questionable.
  8. Piano Concerti 1 and 2 -- I'm fond of Rubinstein-Reiner in 1 and Rubinstein-Krips in 2. In fact I'm discovering that Rubinstein and Brahms were a near-perfect match, much more so IMO than Rubinstein and Chopin. Another gem is Rubinstein's early '30s recording of the first Piano Quartet, with the Pro Arte, coupled with recordings of that vintage of the first violin sonata and the first cello sonata (with Piatagorsky).
  9. Oops -- I reviewed the first series and didn't catch that glitch on the Quincy, though I did say that the second concert wasn't up to the level of the first. I guess it wasn't literally (assuming i.e. that the pitch is off on the flat side).
  10. Speaking of all-girl punk bands and their names, the-soon-to-be wife of one of my son's bandmates in Crush Kill Destroy was in a now defunct but in its time locally (i.e. Chicago) popular all-girl punk band named Twat Vibe, referred to here: http://chillmag.com/july06/features_office.html I always felt that Twat Vibe had a certain ring to it.
  11. Meredith D'Ambrosio does a version of "Moon Dreams" here: http://www.sunnysiderecords.com/release_de...p?releaseID=161 that is clearly informed (as they say) by the Evans-Birth of the Cool recording. Amazing how much of it she conveys with just her voice and a rhythm section.
  12. Here be who John McEntire is ( I assume they spelled the name wrong above, because the rest of McEntire's background fits; he's also a producer/engineer): http://www.trts.com/history/history.html I've heard one member of Antibalas, tenor saxophonist Stuart Bogie, in another setting. He was excellent.
  13. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VqQszOC2SQ...ted&search= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhBr9XtrNsM...ted&search= Info: Charquet & Co in Laren, Netherlands in 1978.The band was founded in 1967 as Reverend Charkey's Congregation, which was eventually shortened to Charkey & Co,, then finally Frenchified to its final form. Charquet was, of course cornetist Jean-Pierre Morel, who had an admiration for the work of New Orleans trumpeter Sharkey Bonanno. During the more than 10 years of its existence the group developed a repertoire of 450 tunes, of which some 215 were arranged by Morel. In the band here are Jean- Pierre on cornet, Jack Cadieu tb, Alain Marquet cl, Marc Bresdin bar sax, Bernard Thevin piano, Michel Bescont tenor, Lionel Benhamou bj, and Gerard Gervois tuba In the late nineties Morel kind of regrouped and calls his new excellent band "Le Petit Jazz Band" Clarinettist Alain Marquet now plays in the internationally renowned Paris Washboard Band, which plays many jazz festivals in the USA. Me again: I recommend all the Le Petit Jazz Band discs on Stomp Off. And dig the banjo solo here on "Everybody Stomp" by the late Lionel Benhamou. Also, one of the secrets of Charquet and Co. and Le Petit is that they're drummer-less.
  14. Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #2 and Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini -- Arthur Rubinstein, CSO, Reiner (mostly for the Rhapsody, which I picked up the other day on an old LP for 50 cents, an amazing performance, so I sprang for the CD).
  15. Think I was around for some of the Hammond thing -- if so, I mostly remember the toxic presence of Mr. McDonough, who was understandably and alternately both slavish and full of himself. Benny Goodman was there, right? And Bob Dylan was or was expected to show? If so, what a brew. The Carter club date is tantilizingly on the edge of memory, but I can't say for sure. Wilbur used to say "Old Man Jo Jones" (with a reminiscent "I still can't believe it" warmth of tone in his voice) rather than Papa Jo Jones -- the way you might refer to the god Apollo if you'd happened to have seen him eat breakfast. Wilbur said that hearing the vintage Basie band (probably at the Regal Theatre) was what made him want to play drums rather than bass (his plan after he'd heard Blanton with Ellington on "Jack the Bear" and "Pitter Panther Patter"). "He used to," said Wilbur, "make the sock cymbals breathe."
  16. Was googling Mat Matthews, Dutch jazz accordion player who came to the U.S. in the '50s and made some nice albums for Dawn and other labels (one on Dawn -- With Farmer, Gryce, Pettiford, K. Clarke et al. -- was exceptional) and found out that he'd returned to the Netherlands some time ago, where he worked with clarinetist-saxophonist Jos Valster in duo called The Shmuck and the Schmo. Didn't say who was who. Don't know Valster's music, but apparently he's a pal of Tony Scott.
  17. I think that Dorsey recording is "Grand Central Getaway." Gillespie is listed as a co-composer and arranger. That was a fine, distinctive band.
  18. A bonus on The Philadelphians is a fantastic muted Lee Morgan solo on "You're Not The Kind" -- what continuity! Also, this is one of the few recorded performances (maybe the only?) by the bass-drum team of Percy Heath and P.J. Jones, who are superb together (along with Ray Bryant).
  19. "Stockholm Sojurn" has some nice writing but probably should be passed up by all but completists. No Golson solo work IIRC. I too like "Terminal 1." I also recall "California Message" and "One More Mem'ry" (both with Fuller, from the early '80s) as being very nice, provided you can take the arguably rather narcissistic bass work of Bob Magnusson.
  20. I and Nate Dorward (visiting from Toronto) heard Golson live at the Jazz Showcase last year. He was in very fine form (i.e. Golson; Nate was in fine form too).
  21. Here, from my book, are two attempts to put the pieces of Art Pepper together. The second one is more to the point we're talking about, but the first adds some context: ART PEPPER The first of these two pieces about Art Pepper was written two years after the first; they appear here in reverse chronological order because, in effect, the obituary attempts to sum up Pepper’s life and artistic achievement, while the second piece, a response to Pepper’s autobiography, Straight Life, tries to explore the reasons why an artist who lived in such a turbulent, frequently self-destructive manner could produce music whose key trait was an often exquisite orderliness and grace. [1982] There will be no more of Art Pepper’s passionate, exquisitely structured music. One of jazz’s great alto saxophonists, Pepper died Tuesday morning of heart failure in a Los Angeles-area hospital, never having regained consciousness after he suffered a stroke six days before. He was fifty-six. “A pioneer of progressive jazz” was the way one wire-service obituary spoke of him, and to the degree that there ever was such a music as “progressive jazz,” Pepper did bear some relation to it--but only because, having worked successfully within “progres¬sive” contexts he defined their limitations by effortlessly transcending them. An artist whose sense of musical order was seemingly innate, he was often stimulated by complex external structures, but in their absence his own form-giving qualities were rich. The “pioneer” tag is also dubious, for Pepper--unlike, say, Lester Young, John Coltrane, and Charlie Parker--did not inaugurate a broadly influential style (though there were a few Pepper disciples). Nor was his attitude toward the jazz artists who preceded him in any sense iconoclastic. A trio of Swing-Era players--alto saxophonists Benny Carter and Willie Smith and tenor saxophonist Joe Thomas--were his initial inspirations, and the symmetry and warmth that characterized their music were qualities Pepper never relinquished. But his own symmetries, for all their grace and apparent ease, bore the marks of intense internal pressure, while his warmth and humanity were those of a man who had to define and test himself anew each time he picked up his horn. From the first, self-expression was Pepper’s goal, and in that sense, aided by his natural ear and burgeoning instrumental facility, he was a jazz musician long before he became familiar with the music. The vital familiarizing process took place while Pepper was still in his teens, at jam sessions in Los Angeles’s Central Avenue district. Joining Stan Kenton’s Orchestra after brief stints with the bands of Gus Arnheim and Carter, Pepper recorded his first solo, “Harlem Folk Dance,” in 1943 and, after Army service and work as a Los Angeles-based freelancer, he returned to Kenton in 1947. This was the period when Pepper became a star of sorts, and on “Art Pepper,” the piece that Kenton trumpeter Shorty Rogers wrote for him in 1950, and on the 1951 “Over the Rainbow,” recorded with Rogers’s octet, Pepper’s suave lyricism and knifelike rhythmic zeal already marked him as a special artist. It was in this period that Pepper became a heroin addict, which led over the next two decades to long absences from the scene and several jail terms. But in the midst of this external chaos, Pepper was perfecting and deepening his music. From 1956 to 1960, his first stage of true maturity, he produced one masterly recorded performance after another: “Besame Mucho,” “I Surrender Dear,” “Pepper Pot,” “Old Croix,” “What Is This Thing Called Love?,” “ All the Things You Are,” “Rhythm-a-ning,” “Winter Moon”--the list is a long one. But eventually the authorities and Pepper’s personal demons had their way, and he was not to make another significant recording until 1975. Pepper returned to jazz with all his skills intact and with his expressive range having increased under the weight of his long ordeal. On any given night until the very end--his last Chicago performance, which took place only two weeks before his stroke, was typical--Pepper challenged himself to the utmost. In his life, Art Pepper seemed to be skating at the edge of an abyss. And yet his music managed to encompass that sense of danger, seeking and finding a wholeness that was, so it seems, denied to its maker. [1980] Like most autobiographies that purport to tell all, Straight Life: The Story of Art Pepper is a tissue of genuine revelations and willful posing, in which the desire to speak the truth is at war with the author’s need to paint himself as a romantic victim. But because Straight Life was written by a major jazz musician, the book does tell us a great deal--about the so-called “jazz life” and also about the tensions that affect almost every artist who functions in the modern world. There are any number of nineteenth- and twentieth-century artists whose lives and whose work expressed an inner emotional turmoil that bordered on self-destruction--Poe, Rimbaud, Van Gogh, Scriabin, Hart Crane, the list could go on and on. But the hallmarks of Art Pepper’s music are lucidity, grace, and a meticulous sense of order. How, one wonders, can those qualities be reconciled with a life so internally chaotic that much of Straight Life reads like a suicide note? The title of the book, borrowed from that of Pepper’s swift little melody on the changes of “After You’ve Gone,” is deliberately ironic, because “straight” is the one thing the alto saxophonist’s life has never been. Born on September 1, 1925, in Gardena, California, he was the byproduct of a brief, stormy romance. His teenaged mother wanted an abortion, his father married her only because he wanted the child to live, and much of Pepper’s youth was spent away from both parents, in the care of his stern paternal grandmother. The account in Straight Life of those early years is grim, but it would have meaning only to Pepper’s friends if it were not for his great musical gifts. From the first he seems to have been a “natural,” with a drive toward self-expression that logically led him toward jazz, although the account of his youthful initiation into that world strikes a note of naïveté that echoes throughout the book. Told by a guitarist that “these are the chords to the blues . . . this is black music, from Africa, from the slave ships that came to America,” Pepper recalls that “I asked him if he thought I might have the right to play jazz.” Musically, the answer to Pepper’s question obviously was “yes,” as it was for Bix Beiderbecke, Pee Wee Russell, and many other white jazzmen. But the fact that Pepper felt compelled to ask (or says that he did--the anecdote sounds a little too pat to be literally true) suggests that emotionally he would forever feel uncertain that his unquestioned ability to play jazz made him part of the jazz community. While still in his teens Pepper worked in predominantly black bands led by Lee Young and Benny Carter and hung out in Los Angeles’s Central Avenue district, where a free and easy racial comradeship prevailed. “There,” Pepper recalls, “everybody just loved everybody else, or if they didn’t, I didn’t know about it.” Young, remembering that same era, says, “It wasn’t about ‘whitey’ this and ‘whitey’ that. It was about good musicianship and people respecting one another for the talents that they had.” Pepper’s talents, which evolved further during a stint with Stan Kenton’s orchestra, required him to forge his own style, one that owed a debt to black jazzmen but was significantly different in that his music seemed increasingly to have uncertainty and isolation as its subject. Then, after a tour of Army duty that led to the disintegration of his first marriage, Pepper returned to Kenton and found, in 1950, what was for him to be the “answer”--heroin. At this point in Straight Life, Pepper makes no excuses. Having found “no peace at all except when I was playing,” he felt, under the influence of the drug, that “I loved myself…I loved my talent. I said, ‘This is it. This is the only answer for me…whatever dues I have to pay.’ I realized that from that moment on I would be, if you want to use the word, a junkie. And that’s what I still am.” If Straight Life were an exemplary tale, Pepper’s career from then until now would be an unbroken account of personal and artistic disintegration. But while he would spend more than a third of the following three decades in jail on various narcotics charges and would involve himself in a mutually self-destructive second marriage, these are also the years of Pepper’s greatest musical triumphs. One answer to this seeming paradox might be that Straight Life is a con job, an attempt by the author to paint himself as a larger-than-life-size rogue. But even if the grimmer anecdotes in the book are discounted, Pepper’s physical presence today is enough to confirm their essential truth. A strikingly handsome man at one time--reminiscent of Tyrone Power, according to a friend--Pepper is now someone whose haunted, ravaged face clearly proclaims that he has never needed to conjure up imaginary demons. Straight Life finally does give us the information we need to resolve the split between Pepper’s willfully disordered life and his carefully ordered music. Indeed, the answer may be found in an aspect of the book that at first seems quite frustrating--in the author’s reluctance to talk about his music and in his corresponding eagerness to relate the lurid details of his sex life, drug addiction, and prison experiences. That music is important to Pepper is believable only if we already know his music; otherwise Straight Life might be the story of any junkie. But soon we realize that, for Pepper, music, drugs, sex, and prison life are, in one sense, all of a piece--or rather, they all seem to be jumbled together in one area of his mind, a realm in which instinctual intelligence exists alongside childlike cunning, in which self-determined forms of order and expression blend into the trials of shame and pride that a lawbreaker’s life tends to bring. For example, Pepper states with special pride that he has never been an informer, never turned in a drug connection. From his point of view, that is an honorable, certain, and essentially private act, a matter between peers in a closed society. And in their various ways, both drug use and sex share similar qualities. One gets high or one does not, in the privacy of one’s own nervous system. One satisfies oneself and one’s partner or one does not, also in relatively private circumstances. And so Pepper feels free to boast about all these things. But music is an exception for him because, like all forms of art, its ultimate meaning cannot be private, cannot be controlled by the artist; other people will take what the artist creates and make of it what they will. Of course, in the jazz world, particularly the world of the black jazz musician, communal agreements have often prevailed between the musicians and the audience , and almost almost always among the musicians themselves . But Pepper no longer seems to trust either of those communities, if he ever did. From his point of view, the comradeship of Central Avenue is gone forever. Instead, the isolated modern artist par excellence, he tries to create his own private world--striving for perfect, spontaneous order because only then will what he creates remain within his control. And, of course, every time he performs, he fails, for his music becomes more lucid and moving to us, and less private to him, the closer he comes to formal perfection. So, for Art Pepper, the tensions remain; and as Straight Life demonstrates, they periodically become too great to be borne. But for us, one step removed from Pepper, the tensions are resolved. And that is the final paradox, that his music may do more for us than it can ever do for him.
  22. You picked a fine one to start, but these two from roughly that period are excellent: http://www.amazon.com/Benny-Golson-Philade...02-6102086-6514 http://www.amazon.com/Free-Benny-Golson-Qu...253&sr=1-31 The second in particular should be snapped up; it's terrific, cheap, and OOP. I'll add that the Fuller-Golson pairing, so fine on "Groovin' With Golson," doesn't always yield topnotch results IMO. See "The Other Side of Benny Golson," which has its moments but isn't locked in the way "Groovin With Golson" is. On the other hand, Fuller's "Bluesette" with Golson (both the Savoy original and a '80s or '90s reunion date, same band) is/are really nice. Also, you probably should hear Golson on Art Farmer's "Modern Art."
  23. My remark was prompted not by any desire to knock Jo Jones as a musician but because several people had said things like "...the cat was so freakin' HAPPY!!! Look at him when plays; his face just radiates JOY!" And I'm not saying that his music wasn't full of happiness and joy -- for us and in some sense for him. I'm just saying that the relationship between beautiful, joyful music-making and beautiful, joyful personhood (for want of a better term) isn't always simple and is sometimes near impossible to disentangle. I've still never figured out how Artie Shaw could play like an angel and be such a pompous, egotistical jerk. By comparison, putting Art Pepper the man and the musician together is child's play.
  24. Very interesting post, Mark -- raises some interesting questions, too, for those of us who admire both KD and Shaw but perhaps wonder at times whether the presence of diatonic linking notes in KD led to more/deeper continuity, potential variety, while the absence of them in Shaw boxed him into a corner or atmosphere of striving and strain, however noble and necessary it might have been to be there. I guess I'm saying, in part, that you can't chose what your temperaament as an artist is and how your temperament and talents fit into the your historical position, i.e. what's open to be done at a particular point in the continuum.
  25. I'm sorry, but I've heard from many sources that Jones, great player though he was, was just ----ing nuts and often a pain in the ass to work with.
×
×
  • Create New...