Is it common among medical researchers to farm out their writing tasks? My wife, who is an historian, has never heard of this being the case in her discipline.
I have a friend who makes a pretty good living doing this sort of work for doctors.
I suppose either historians are expected to be able to write, or there is less excess cash hanging around to pay ghostwriters in the history field than in the health field.
--eric
There's not a lot of excess cash in academic medical research (pharmaceutical/device industry, maybe... but even there the significant $$$ would go to the ad copy writers, not the scientific writers!).
It's more that academic history is so closely intertwined with writing -- whereas lab bench, operating room and bedside skills are quite a bit further afield -- and also, my "ghost-writing" has always been for people that I work with daily: answering phones, pipetting samples, doing literature searches (in the library in the old days, mostly online now) and writing grant proposals, reports, patient-consent-forms and a million other things... and a lot of the "writing" is re-writing, copy-editing. Or in the case of an abstract, distilling the gist of a 10 page paper into 500 words, 250 words.