Jump to content

drugs in the hard bop jazz scene


jbs-tom

Recommended Posts

Why (!) have drugs been always part of the hard bop jazz scene?

Fact is: At this period of time was no education of drugs or any clarifications of the fact what happens when you use drugs !

Do you think an education of drugs could had changed the jazz scene ??

... it doesn't matter ... , bebop,hard bop cool jazz whatever....

focusing on a time where have been no education of drugs !

so, have drugs changed jazz in special direction ?

>> no masterpieces of jazz without drugs ??

--

thank you in advance for your suggestions, thoughts, links, answers and more ... !

Edited by jbs-tom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

you'd better keep going back further than that. drugs have always been present in the lives of some musicians, including those who play jazz. here's an excerpt from a book on louis armstrong, a quote from pops himself:

"Speaking of 1931 - we did call ourselves Vipers, which could have been anybody from all walks of life that smoked and respected gage. That was our cute little name for marijuana, and it was a misdemeanor in those days. Much different from the pressure and charges the law lays on a guy who smokes pot - a later name for the same thing which is cute to hear nowadays. We always looked at pot as a sort of medicine, a cheap drunk and with much better thoughts than one that's full of liquor."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the links, Claude. That Playboy panel discussion looks interesting, though I have to say that on first blush, its hard to imagine a 100% commitment to absolute truth in that kind of public forum. But I haven't read it yet, so that's just an instinctual thing.

Its certainly interesting that in the first few moments, Duke states that he doesn't think that drug addiction is an occupational hazard for the musician. Hard to agree with that when you consider how many people thought it was the junk that made Bird play like he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

who is the drummer that stan is talking about?

KENT0N: There is one particular drummer who used to play with the band and is really big in the field of jazz - he had the problem, but he straightened out and he beat the situation wonderfully well. But it's miserable the way the police still stay after him, they keep looking at him - every time be turns around there's someone who's saying, "Let's talk to you, let's examine you " and sometimes - he's pretty patient with them, but every once in a while - you can just see this look on his face: "I wish everyone would leave me alone."

:mellow:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, the question is whether more education would have had an effect, not whether it would have erased drugs from the scene. I have to think that education and awareness would have had some effect-- heroin use has been largely driven underground (relatively speaking) in the last 20-30 years. How *significant* that difference would have been, I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't say for sure who the drummer was that Kenton was talking about, but my guess would be the recently deceased Stan Levey, who did have a drug problem and beat it and, of course, played with Kenton. But was Levey "really big in the field of jazz"? If it was Levey, "really big" seems an exaggeration (Levey's undoubted talent aside), but then exaggeration was often Kenton's mode (e.g. "This is an OR-chestra!") The only other drummer I can think of who played with Kenton and was a jazz notable in 1960 was Shelly Manne, who definitely would fit the "really big in jazz" label, but I'm virtually certain that Shelly was clean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course not. Education about drugs exists today, and drugs are still a part of the music scene.

... of course we have today education of drugs - but the question is: what if we would have it NOT (like all those jazz players)

would have been the creative output of these jazz musicians the same ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't say for sure who the drummer was that Kenton was talking about, but my guess would be the recently deceased Stan Levey, who did have a drug problem and beat it and, of course, played with Kenton. But was Levey "really big in the field of jazz"? If it was Levey, "really big" seems an exaggeration (Levey's undoubted talent aside), but then exaggeration was often Kenton's mode (e.g. "This is an OR-chestra!") The only other drummer I can think of who played with Kenton and was a jazz notable in 1960 was Shelly Manne, who definitely would fit the "really big in jazz" label, but I'm virtually certain that Shelly was clean.

another jazz mystery!

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fact is: At this period of time was no education of drugs or any clarifications of the fact what happens when you use drugs !

Do you think an education of drugs could had changed the jazz scene ??

No. Two words: Kenny Kirkland.

Kenny's case is a tragic one, and there's stories of other current, high profile jazz musicians, having similar problems. But I don't think drug use in jazz today is any higher than it is in the general population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...