Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Does anyone have this one :

Bobby Hutcherson "Cirrus"

Woody Shaw, Harold Land, Emanuel Boyd, Bill Henderson, Ray Drummond, Larry Hancock and Kenneth Nash,

Studio in Los Angeles 4/17/1974 -- 4/18/1974

This would hopefully be Wood on the top of his game.

Guest akanalog
Posted

i don't know how it all works, but why won't a company like water reissue some of these hutcherson sides? they are digging into BN around this time. french BN too, is doing some more 70s stuff-maybe they would give them a shot? they should. i like fusion but i would rather hear cirrus than mind transplant!

Posted

I hear ya!

I think Waters would be a good vehicle. . . but. . . I remember reading here that there were Mosaic plans for "seventies Hutcherson Blue Notes" and I would find it hard to believe this one wouldn't be included in their plans. If they plan it, it's likely EMI isn't going to have another American company lease it. . . Not impossible, but unlikely.

Posted

This is not my idea of good Hutcherson. Mostly repetitive figures on marimba sounding vibes. Woody only gets to solo on two of the five tracks tracks, typical Woody stuff, he doesn't even get to solo on his own 'Rosewood'. The best track is the title track, a nice straight ahead number.

Posted

Yeah I have this and it is nice, a strange affair for Bobby but better than some of his later BNs

Here is some more details courtesy of those wonderful people at Gokudo ( notice now they have all the back liner notes for blue notes :D )

Posted

This is not my idea of good Hutcherson. Mostly repetitive figures on marimba sounding vibes. Woody only gets to solo on two of the five tracks tracks, typical Woody stuff, he doesn't even get to solo on his own 'Rosewood'. The best track is the title track, a nice straight ahead number.

I agree. I have this on LP and I've always found his '70s studio sessions to be incredibly dull, even more so when compared to his extraordinary '60s output. The good news for me is that when I saw him several times in the '70s his club dates were infinitely better and more exciting than anything he was putting on record at that time. Unfortunately, that live stuff wasn't recorded.

Posted

Here is some more details courtesy of those wonderful people at Gokudo ( notice now they have all the back liner notes for blue notes :D )

Andy, excuse my ignorance but who or what is 'Gokudo'?

Posted

erm yeh sorry forgot to put their website up

Excellent site although they have really changed in the last few weeks with new scans for rear covers...and they seem to have taken the japanese lp pressings off , you know like the KING series with Japanese only issues..unless they have run out of space...one of my fav sites ...save for this one

really good for those rare scans for hard to find lps or mosaic sets where I never got to see the original lp

let me know if you see the japanese blue notes anywhere

Andy

Posted

This is not my idea of good Hutcherson. Mostly repetitive figures on marimba sounding vibes. Woody only gets to solo on two of the five tracks tracks, typical Woody stuff, he doesn't even get to solo on his own 'Rosewood'. The best track is the title track, a nice straight ahead number.

Relistened to that album and agree with this decription although it's not a bad one. Neither Woody Shaw, not Harold Land get enough solo space.

Posted

I just think the intent of the album is to be more "Groovey" and less jazz and solo centric. . . So I think it succedes within the intention. (But short of asking Bobby, I'm not positive of his intentions. I dig this one a lot though for what it is or what I perceive it is or both).

Posted (edited)

Yeah, I think it's got a "populist" flavor to it, and I'm ok with that. It's not like they dumbed down either the playing or the material, they just presented the music in a different format as far as arrangements and soloists go. Of course, Bobby's center stage all the way, but think about it - that's what the "general public" likes to be presented with, an identifiable "focal point", a "name" to put to the music.

It's my understanding that the Hutcherson/Land band was actually pretty popular up and down the Pacific Coast in the late 60s/early 70s, so BN was no doubt trying to expand that popularity into something less regional. This was a time when such things were possible, and Bobby probably wanted it too, seeing some of the later albums he made for the label. Some of those albums, like Montara & San Francisco were obviously aimed at reaching a broader market, and actually achieved that goal (although neither really do too much for me, even though for some San Francisco is a stone classic), and others, like Natural Illusions didn't. And some of them, like Waiting just tend to fall flat to my ears. There's no real "there" there, if you know what I mean, even though none of them are truly bad. But Cirrus works for me. Good tunes and good playing by everybody, no matter how the solos are allocated. I just wish it had been recorded/mixed with more of an "up front" quality. Mileages, though obviously vary on that.

The one that's a real trip is Head On, where Hutcherson let Bayete Todd Cochrane have his head. As on Hadley Calliman's Iapetus the results are pretty unorthodox, moreso actually. And yet again, the thing is not recorded/mixed in a way that favors the music being played. Blame the producer, George Butler, I guess. Pretty sure that one didn't do too well at all.

Edited by JSngry
Guest akanalog
Posted

who reissued those eddie gales? water? they should do the 2 bayete ones on fantasy or milstone or whichever too!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...