Jump to content

BNLA Series, more 999 Yen reissues from EMI Japan


Daniel A

Recommended Posts

There is a new 24-bit/192kHz FLAC remaster by Bernie Grundman available on HD Tracks which has too much (imo) high end and exposes tape hiss. I find it hard to listen to on headphones. The McMaster isn't perfect either.

Well, if it exposes tape hiss Grundman didn't use heavy noise reduction during mastering, which is a positive point in my book. On the other hand boosting the highs generally isn't.

Haven't heard that FLAC remaster, so I can't comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 141
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm not qualified to judge if the highs have been boosted on the HD Tracks release. Perhaps I'm just too used to a truncated high end and it just needs some getting used to.

The problem with TOCJ 8676 is that it's out of print and expensive (and can't be sampled illegally as a bit-torrent download).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I own the TOCJ-8676 release as well as the American CD reissue from the 90s. I've also got the original LP and a later Japanese LP reissue. Why the obsession? It's simply one of my favourite albums ever and I was searching for the best sounding version.

From what I can recall nothing beats the original LP. I'll get back with a fresh opinion when I've had time to check the different versions again, probably this weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never heard the Japanese CD of 'Total Eclipse' but of all the copies of this I have (Liberty blue/white LP, UA blue label LP, French Pathe Marconi 80s LP, 90s reissue CD) the Liberty blue/white LP is the best by quite a long way. Seems to be quite a bit of high-end roll off and low sound/noise on the tapes though.

Edited by sidewinder
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listening to the HD Tracks release and it is better than I remembered (certainly better than the FLAC rip of the McMaster on my computer). It must be my aversion to official downloads and collector's need for a physical object.

Last month I ordered the McMaster after finding a not too ridiculously priced copy on eBay. Unfortunately that CD was lost in the mail. Listening to the Grundman remaster now, I realize I should never have ordered the McMaster in the first place.

There's only a little tape hiss at the end of some tracks. Never comment on the sound quality of a release before listening again prior to posting. :rolleyes:

I am still curious about how TOCJ-8676 compares to the other releases, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The original CD reissue of Total Eclipse was released in 1989, not the 1990s. It was remixed by Malcolm Addey, but there are no mastering credits. There's no mention of Ron McMaster; he's explicitly mentioned on other Blue Note CD reissues from those years, so he might not have been involved in this one.

Edited by J.A.W.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if it matters or not, but as Total Eclipse wasn't recorded at Van Gelder's studio it might be a multitrack recording and as a consequence it couldn't be transferred to digital using the same equipment as was used for other "classic" BN CD reissues.

FWIW - and any muddiness aside - I think the sound as captured in the studio suits the session. It doesn't sound like a BN recording, but is none the worse for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what you guys are talking of here, but "Total Eclipse" is a fine album and ought to be heard in some form. I was overjoyed to be able to pick up a copy of the McMaster a few years ago, at a decent price - and frankly with my lo-fi ears, I've never thought much about its sound. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what you guys are talking of here, but "Total Eclipse" is a fine album and ought to be heard in some form. I was overjoyed to be able to pick up a copy of the McMaster a few years ago, at a decent price - and frankly with my lo-fi ears, I've never thought much about its sound. :)

Which McMaster are you referring to? McMaster is not credited on the 1989 CD reissue, Malcolm Addey is.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have both the original CD release and the TOCJ and to my ears there is a significant difference in the way they sound. The TOCJ is louder and brighter than the original and the instruments are more clearly defined. However I think I still prefer the original and do play that version the most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I own the TOCJ-8676 release as well as the American CD reissue from the 90s. I've also got the original LP and a later Japanese LP reissue. Why the obsession? It's simply one of my favourite albums ever and I was searching for the best sounding version.

From what I can recall nothing beats the original LP. I'll get back with a fresh opinion when I've had time to check the different versions again, probably this weekend.

It was even worse than I remembered: I've got both Toshiba and King LP pressings in addition to the US Liberty release.

Anyway, the Malcom Addey remix is better than I remembered and I clearly prefer it to the TOCJ-8676 which I find too loud and compressed. The mix and soundstage of Addey's remix is somewhat different from the original LP, but I can't say I prefer any of them over the other.

I believe this was first reissued on CD in the "Collector's choice" series. Some (all?) titles were reprinted a few years later and my copy of the US CD version actually has "(p) © 1995" on it. It's the same 1988 Malcolm Addey remix though.

Edited by Daniel A
Link to comment
Share on other sites

its initial issue on disc was several years before the collector's choice series. at the time, the booklets came with a thin lamination and have held up well.

i think because it's such a great session and represents the best of the 4200 series is the reason we all want to hear the best possible version of it that we can, in an obsession-free way of course. there's a lot of color and texture to the date. on the other hand, for some reason it strikes me as odd that every issue of 'san francisco' i've heard is pretty nice.

oh, and hopefully head man and erwbol can work out something on that tocj issue...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh, and hopefully head man and erwbol can work out something on that tocj issue...

If you are refering to the CD I bought that was lost in the mail, I got a refund from the seller. It wasn't Head Man, though, but someone else from the UK.

On the HD Tracks Grundman remaster, volume levels are a tad higher than the original Blue Note CD, but I do not think it suffers from compression. It is more like the other audiophile releases of sixties Blue Note (XRCD24, SACD, etc.) in character. The mix is also different from the Malcolm Addey CD, so perhaps more like the LPs?

I think I'll just buy a spindle of CD-Rs (it's been a while) and burn a copy of the Grundman reduced to 16 bit with Audacity.

Edited by erwbol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, etherbored.

erwbol, can you let us know what the CD-R you burn from the "Total Eclipse" HD tracks sounds like please. If it's better than the Michael Addey CD then I might treat myself.

When I connect my Sennheiser HD650 headphones to my iMac the 16-bit files sound practically the same as the original 24-bit/192kHz files, so previous remarks still apply. I will burn both the Addey rip and the Grundman 16-bit reduced files to CD-RW and compare on my modest system, but I'm no audiophile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...