Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • soulpope

    9559

  • Peter Friedman

    8717

  • HutchFan

    8619

  • jazzbo

    7117

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted
21 minutes ago, HutchFan said:

Excellent! :tup

I do like it (I mean, what's not to like?), but I also feel that this label was perhaps not really equipped to give this record the best production it could have had, maybe?

Posted
22 minutes ago, JSngry said:

I do like it (I mean, what's not to like?), but I also feel that this label was perhaps not really equipped to give this record the best production it could have had, maybe?

Do you mean the mix is poor?  Or some other aspect of production?  

Posted
51 minutes ago, BillF said:

2196963

516HOeipXmL._SY355_.jpg

Two remarkably similar albums separated by forty years! And both very good.

Thanks for posting those, Bill. I am especially interested in the earlier release. You already know I'm a big fan.

Posted
15 minutes ago, HutchFan said:

Do you mean the mix is poor?  Or some other aspect of production?  

I think the mix is inconsistent, and maybe in a few cases the performances sound rushed or otherwise not totally relaxed. I get that this was not going to be a really stretched out date, but the last two cuts are just ZONED, whereas a few of the others sound like maybe another take wouldn't have hurt, to maybe get a better flow. Then again, time/place/budget/etc.

Not complaining, mind you, just observing. This is not a typical Black & Blue date to begin with anyway, and I'm glad they made it, period.

Posted
5 minutes ago, JSngry said:

I think the mix is inconsistent, and maybe in a few cases the performances sound rushed or otherwise not totally relaxed. I get that this was not going to be a really stretched out date, but the last two cuts are just ZONED, whereas a few of the others sound like maybe another take wouldn't have hurt, to maybe get a better flow. Then again, time/place/budget/etc.

Not complaining, mind you, just observing. This is not a typical Black & Blue date to begin with anyway, and I'm glad they made it, period.

I hear you. There's definitely an "off the cuff" vibe. ... Need to pull that one out and give it another listen.

Posted
2 hours ago, HutchFan said:

Do you mean the mix is poor?  Or some other aspect of production?  

On my Evidence label version of this, on track 1 Reggie Workman is more prominent in the mix than than Billy Harper! Also the room in which the album was recorded seems fairly dead/claustrophobic. I've never lasted all  the way through.

Posted

And yet, this one (and the one after it, the last two on the album)) is ON!

 

Although, yes, mix still off.

But, it seems to improve on the fly. The playing, though, is full frontal burn all the way. I'd like to know what the recording order was, both to trace the evolution of the playing and of the mixing.

Posted
2 hours ago, JSngry said:

And yet, this one (and the one after it, the last two on the album)) is ON!

 

Although, yes, mix still off.

But, it seems to improve on the fly. The playing, though, is full frontal burn all the way. I'd like to know what the recording order was, both to trace the evolution of the playing and of the mixing.

OK -- I need to listen again from this point on.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...