Yes, or better yet a master copy sent to a licensee. As I said before, EMI issued a needle drop of the AEC's Les Stances A Sophie when I have a first class tape in my basement.
Do you expect reviewers of Ellington records to be bandleaders, pianists, composer and arrangers?
It should be about MUSIC, not the specifics of an instrument.
If it works (or fails) as "music", the instrument should be of no concern.
Chuck,
It seems that a lot of people disagree with your assessment of the label. (On the sound, not on the legality.) Reviews I've read suggest this set has better sound than the Savoy/Dial set.
I will probably pick this up over the next few weeks and offer my comments.
Guy
Chuck did say their sound in the last few years-- and judging by my discs and previous discussions here, most agree. They typically just steal another mastering. That doesn't mean THIS set is bad....
Many of the JSPs of the last 10 years have come from "stolen" masters. Things seem to have changed very recently BUT the AMG review does say Ted Kendall did the set. He's a good engineer but he had to work from commercial 78s (or cop remasterigs from other sets) while Savoy had the session acetates. The Savoys sound wonderful. I just don't understand buying this music from a company not bound by original contracts with the artists.
Never had shit to do with Ricci's site other than posting a few messages and receiving nasty notes from Ricci.
No reflections on you CJ, but I do have issues.
Back off folks.
Organ players hear stuff the rest don't.
That may be of little importance to the rest of us.
I appreciate "specialists" as much as anyone.
"Innovative" is an overused word and I fear few folks understand the meaning.
All participants should step back and understand what they said.
The organ is only one of a bunch of instruments played by "jazz musicians".