Good answer. Why not play it on a 4 track machine for even more flexibility?
I know the answer which is the same as the reason to avoid a simple stereo playback.
FWIW, I think the highest quality transfer can be made by transferring on a full mono machine and patching problems by picking undamaged bits via multitracking. It takes more work but pays sonic results. You do have to deal with matching tape noise beds but it works very well. I certainly hope someone is paying for high quality copies of these original masters as they whip by the tape heads.
I told you he'd have an impressive answer.
The proof, though, is in the pudding as they say. I've heard some of Steve's work on these tapes (not the MJQ specifically, but others from the OJC catalog) and they are by far the best sounding versions of this material that I've ever heard.
I'm not really choosing sides or picking a fight here, just presenting options as I see 'em. I just want all to see there are no friggin' absolutes.
I do think all these companies are damaging the "historic" master tapes by remastering again and again. Get it right with current technology and do it again when the technology improves significantly. Use technology for something other than a marketing opportunity.