It seems to me that if people had their own kinds of personal "culture" instead of relying on what they're enticed to enjoy, there could potentially be a wider variety of enjoyment to share amongst each other coupled with the lack of necessity to feel that some larger idea of culture is "stagnating." We shouldn't be mere spectators or consumers of a monolithic idea of culture, defined by the sweeping brushstrokes of societal consensus or the grand narratives of progress. Instead, we’re all architects of our own experiences looking at ideas of culture - not a stagnant pool waiting for the rains of innovation to stir its depths, but a vibrant tapestry, woven from the myriad threads of personal expression and connection. The concept of cultural stagnation becomes irrelevant under this situation - a mere phantom of a collective mindset overly concerned with grand narratives and the fear of not reaching some imagined pinnacle of progress.