Daniel A

Producing such pornography was illegal before. In 1999 possesion of a piece of child pornography became illegal too. The Swedish constitution's regulations about the freedom of speech and freedom of press prevented laws criminalizing possesion of any books, pictures, etc., but in 1999 the constitution was changed to allow new legislation in this area. I believe possesion of child pornography was criminalized in 1990 in the US.

I wouldn't trust the paper Expressen on any subject. However, if "the same estimate" can be applied on any country, the US could have something to worry about too, considering the number of pets... While not criminalized per se, sex with an animal would - if proven - probably render punishment under the Swedish Animal Protection Act anyway.

Your English is excellent, ds, no need to apologize! And I understand you completely! If someone is playing in something that could be described as a given jazz style, as bebop, swing or whatever, that person has certainly been listening somewhat (or probably a great deal) to others playing in that style. Of course it could be possible to learn chordal improvistion from a theoretical point of view, and then cut loose on a set of bebop tunes, but the results would probably not sound too much like bebop. It has been pointed out again and again through the years that young jazz musicians should "know their jazz history" and things like that. Sometimes I wonder though, if not young players could do with a little less listening if we want to see something "new". With 1000 Coltrane solos in your luggage, how could they not affect you, either if you're playing in reference or in opposition to them? Regarding Gilbert Holmström, I think he was really in search of a voice of his own, and the similarities to Coltrane migh perhaps not been a result of him really studying Coltrane. However, if the result is sounding like Coltrane, noone will care if you've been copying Trane or your personal mix of influences from the whole of jazz (including Coltrane) just happend to make you sound a bit like him. Edit: Reading couw's post that slipped in between this and the post of ds, I realize that I shouldn't be too hard on poor Gilbert without having heard all of the album this topic about. I'll see if I can pick it up locally...

Obviously, I'm not Jim , but I think it's all for the best to have steady flow of new members. New perspectives, new knowledge, etc. And I don't think we'll have to fear that would water down the feel of the community.

Interesting that you should bring up Holmström's Coltrane influence, ds! I remember there was quite some discussion about that on a Swedish message board some five or six years ago. Some people were claiming Holmström had in fact developed his style on his own. The fact that he actually did sound a bit like Coltrane on some recordings was waved off as a mere coincidence... I'll try to ask a friend of mine who was active in the discussion if he remembers more (I believe there were some more specific talk about Holmström's improvisational philosophy). Anyway, the one Mount Everst LP I have (recorded three years later, in 1978) sounds nothing like the sound clip. It features Holmström together with Ronny Johansson on piano, Matz Nilsson on bass and Anders Kjellberg on drums, and is in a lyrical post-bop/fusion vein.

I think the Conn was remastered by someone else, his name escapes my mind right now... but from what I can remember Rudy did not remaster CDs for BN back then. However, I think the Conn sounds very fine; never understood the criticism this particular remaster got from some back at the BNBB. The Rare Groove CD issue of 'Sweet Honey Bee' however, taken from vinyl as it is, sounds muddy to me. I believe some noise-cancelling device is partly to blame for this. I think the mid 90s Japanese TOCJ of this title sounds much better. Still from vinyl from what I can tell (as the new RVG, too; remember Kevin B asking for mint LP copies? Unfortunately I was on vacation then - I've played my Liberty LP only twice since breaking the seal) but much better done.

I remember 'On Green Dolphin Street' as played ridiculously fast on the Affinity LP; is it performed in the same manner on the bootleg?

To add to the picture: Today everything seems normal, but during the last couple of days this site has been loading slow over here.

No doubt Farrell found a tenor voice more of his own during the seventies. I love his playing with the original Return to Forever group, but actually I find him even greater on flute than on sax on those albums. I admit he still must have been more under the influence of George Coleman and others at the end of the 60s, but strangely enough I dig his tenor playing on those Elvin dates more than most of what came after! Could it be that he (Farrell) was adapting very much (some would say too much) to the various situations he played in back then? I think he sounded different with Corea in 1966 ('Tones for Joan's Bones'), and then again different with Jaki Byard in 1965. Now, I'm not particularly involved by Byard's playing so it's been a while since I listened to those albums, but I remember I thought Farrell played much better on the Corea album.

Some comments regarding track 3: I thought it was Joe Farrell - and not George Coleman - who did the tenor solo. I admit that they sound somewhat alike to me, but someone who knows his George Coleman better than me perhaps could help me out here... I compared the track 'Mr. Jones' (which was track #3 on John's disc) with 'Whew', which is the only other track from that session on which Farrell plays tenor. I'm not quite certain (obviously), but to me it sounded as if soloist number two on that track is Coleman, and the first soloist is Farrell. The tenorist on 'Mr. Jones' sounds more similar to Farrell, and is located at the same place in the sound mix as Farrell is on 'Whew'. The liner notes for the Mosaic (unfortunately I don't have the LP releases of 'Poly-Currents' and 'Mr. Jones' so I don't know what they say) which are written by Dave Liebman states that it's Farrell soloing on 'Mr. Jones'. Of course Liebman may be mistaken on that point. What do you others think? Calling all George Coleman fanatics!

Just sent you a PM, Adam!

Swedish Radio, Channel 2, is airing a recorded Martial Solal solo concert right now! Click on this link: http://www.sr.se/p2/ then click on 'Webbradio' in the upper left corner. First you'll have to choose the player of choice from a drop-down menu: Windows Media Player (broadband connection), Windows Media Player (dial-up) or Real Audio Player. Click OK, and then choose 'P2 Musik' to listen to the webcast. Still 45 minutes left of the concert!

Thanks guys! As Claude said, buying from the US can sometimes make a better deal than the record store around the block, considering the dollar rate... Anyway, a sealed copy at a decent price wouldn't be a problem, I suppose.

Audiophile International seems to have a pretty good selection of vinyl. http://www.audiophileusa.com/ Does anyone have experience from dealing with them? Are they reliable, and does the gradings of the LPs generally seem fair?

Rockefeller center, what MP3 encoder are you going to use, and what encoder settings? Just curious...

Thanks, Cluade! I found an extensive test of the Contour 1.3 in an old Swedish audiophile magazine, and the testers stressed that a powerful amp was needed to drive the speakers. Probably I'll need a new amp and a new CD player too... But I can't upgrade everything at once anyway. Perhaps it would be better to wait until I may get a new amp and speakers at the same time to avoid a future mismatch. But I'll definitely keep the TD125!

Magnepans would eat your amp alive. So would perhaps the Dynaudios too... I just checked the "Recommended Amp. Power" in the specs for the various Dynaudio models. Contour S1.4: Small size rooms: >30 watts Medium size rooms: >80 watts Large size rooms: -- watts ( http://www.dynaudiousa.com/products/contour/s14/s14spec.htm ) Audience 52: Small size rooms: >25 watts Medium size rooms: >65 watts Large size rooms: -- watts ( http://www.dynaudiousa.com/products/audien...2/aud52spec.htm ) At least my amp would still manage in a "small" room... Allthough I've heard that the rated power was a bit lower than the actual output. I've always loved the sound of the H/K 930, so I'd like to try to hang on to it. Is there any point of getting a separate power amp to it?

You're right, in a component burner only 'audio' CDRs may be used. I rather meant to say that using 'audio' CDRs in a computer burner may produce suboptimal results. I thought maybe that had been the case, but as you're only using a component burner I can only think of the aforementioned compatibility issue as the reason; some CDRs brands just don't work so good with some burner brands.

No, it's no chordal intrument at all!

I've just listened through the disc once (except for a few tracks which demaded to be played again), so here are some short comments (without having tried to use the AMG) 1. This sounds very much like a Kenny Dorham thing, allthough the alto flute at the end had a ring of early 70s film music to it. Maybe something Dorham wrote for another band. 2. This sounds a bit European in concept. Could the trombonist be Julian Priester? I liked the trumpeter better, though, who sounds like a cleaned up 60s version of Chet Baker. And, as has been mentioned, the drummer must surely be Max Roach, or...? This sounds like an album I might get soon. 3. I have the box set which contains this track, and it's all very enjoyable. It's very sad that this sax player didn't have the chance to stretch out like this more often. If he did, it didn't get recorded anyway. He's a favorite of mine! 4. Not entirely to my taste. The sax player is pleasingly soft-toned for the context - I had expected more screaming. Well, I can't think of anything more to say about this... 5. A mid 90s recording? Nice playing, perhaps a tad too "cold" to really involve me at first hearing. 6. The sax player really sounds sounds at least one generation older than anyone on the previous cuts (which could go for the bass and drums, too). Especially his vibrato... This is probably someone I "should" know about. At least the sax sounds familiar in some way. 7. This track really had me intrigued! The trombonist clearly has listened to J.J. Johnson - I heard a few signature licks - but he really doesn't sound like J.J. My guess is that both the trombonist and the tenorist are fairly obscure players. It sounds like it was recorded in the late 60s, and by then this kind of soloing wasn't even mainstream any more. Nevertheless it appeals to me, especially the trombone solo was nice. The big band parts are rather rudimentary, but effective in their own way. In the more climactic passages the lowest brass and sax parts are voiced in way that Oliver Nelson favoured, except that his arrangements always had more of a 'Hollywood' vibe to them. I'm really curious about this one! 8. The bass sound is about as much 80s as it could be. Is it recorded in the mid 80s? On a sidenote: I recently realized that I have at least four times more recordings from any decade from the 50s up to the 2000s than I've got recording from the 80s. 9. This track was fun! I could not help smiling when I heard the bass solo, not even the third time I listened to the track! Throughout the cut I keep listening the most to the bassist, but the sax is good too. I didn't think I could enjoy this kind of playing, but apparently I do! Great! 10. Not a clue. The rhythm section sounds like authentic beat players rather than jazz musicians. Not my cup of the, allthough the Rahsaan-type whistles were a bit fun. 11. This made me a bit nervous, allthough I didn't exactly find it off-putting. We'll see if I get to like it more... but I'm not sure about that. 12. As someone said, virtousic trombone playing. But I find it a bit hard to really enjoy it. 13. A nice shift of pace. Interesting to hear once, but I'm not sure I'll return to it soon. 14. This is about as sweet playing I've ever heard! I get the feeling I'm suddenly in a pleasant dream. Exquisitly performed. But perhaps a full album of tunes like this would be too much. 15. I've had trouble getting into solo saxophone playing earlier, but I found it rather easy to sit through this, and even enjoy it. Perhaps it's like piano-less recordings which I once despised, but a few years later it didn't matter at all... by the way, that IS the theme, right?

Like chris said; as standalone CD burners typically burn discs in 1x speed, or perhaps 2x or 4x at a maximum, CDRs designed for use in these recorders may not be optimized for high-speed burning, as opposed to computer CDRs. So when such audio CDRs are used in a computer burner (some of which - like mine - cannot burn slower than, say 8x speed) in speeds like 16x or even faster, the error rate may be higher than if computer CDRs had been used, thus causing extraction from the disc once it's burned to be more problematic. On the other hand, if you're having problems copying them in a component CD burner it may just be a matter of bad compatibility. Such things happens in the world of CDRs.

Thanks for the recommendations so far! I'll definitely give the Dynaudio Contours a listen, allthough I think they'll be just a bit too expensive (I think it was the Audience 42's I tried a few years ago). I'll probably try affordable models from B&W and KEF, too, as well as Magnepan (if I can find any). Lon's suggestion looks interesting, but I suspect that it may be difficult to find any to test over here.

If by 'burning the file to a CD' you mean burning an audio CD, playable in an audio CD player, the files have in fact already been converted to the WAV format by the burning software. If there's a difference between the sound quality of that disc, and a disc of files converted to WAV before the burning, it appears that the MP3 to WAV conversion of the burning software is flawed. Regarding the overall sound quality of MP3, one has to keep in mind that serious MP3 compressing software offers an large number of different settings which affects the resulting file size as well as the sound quality. I'd say that on a good stereo setup the difference between a typical MP3 file and the original source is perfectly audible, while an MP3 file compressed with a good software (such as the LAME MP3 encoder) and without too much compression (an average bitrate of around 200 kbps, which gives a compression ratio of about 1:7) is very hard to distinguish from the original.

I don't think there is an overlap, John. The last threads seems to be dated October 19, 2001. In the next-to-last thread in the 'Forum Suggestions' forum ( http://www.bluenote.com/bulletinboard/ubb/...TML/000202.html ), bo (remember him? - the last sane person in the BNBB-related staff ) responds to the comments regarding a then recent change in the color settings with: "Well, it's Jason playing with the color scheme in preparation for the launch of the redesigned site (to be launched shortly)." As I remember it the board was closed for a couple of days before the updated software was implemented. The trick of linking to a particular thread in the old layout only worked for threads created before the cut-off date (as it seems October 19th), and only posts up to this date was displayed.

Why didn't anyone think of this before... From the item description: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...item=2584899175