Got the book today and cut to that last chapter just to see what the point was going to be.
Still not sure, other than that the history of this era is to date incomplete because the musicology is written by people who were not a part of the community then or now, to which I can only say...this is different than most all Black Music how, exactly?
Also, I'd like to know where all this "emphasis" on the "New Thing" is in today's narrative. Marion Brown is hardly a household name. Neither is Bobby Bradford, and he's still active!
And this whole notion of narrative...I recall that the whole narrative being changed with the corporately funded Young Lions thing. Not only was the avant-garde excommunicated, but so was much of the music covered in this book (as well as it's evolutionary successors). We don't fix a damn thing until we purge that bullshit and that ain't gonna happen.
To that end, there's a reference at the very end of this chapter to "the great jazz scholar Albert Murray"...no. Philosopher, muse, pontificator, yes, yes, and especially yes. But scholar?
Words matter.
Now, having said that, I definitely like the premise(s) that seem to be driving this book. Anything that expands the truth rather than contracts it is welcome here.
There's a lot more to be corrected than this bit here. But every bit helps.