Jump to content

Guy Berger

Members
  • Posts

    7,799
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Guy Berger

  1. Are these all in-print in Europe? They are OOP in the US. Guy
  2. With the upcoming private equity buyout of EMI, some great jazz may soon be going out of print. What are some of your favorite currently IN-PRINT Blue Note/EMI jazz/Pacific Jazz/Capitol Jazz/etc releases? Let's restrict these to CDs that are not RVGs, Connoisseur Series, or Mosaic releases. Some personal favorites: Grant Green, Street of Dreams Cannonball Adderley, Mercy Mercy Mercy Gerry Mulligan and Chet Baker, 2 CD quartets release Joe Lovano, Rush Hour Jason Moran, Black Stars Big John Patton, Let 'Em Roll Thelonious Monk & John Coltrane, Live at the Five Spot Thelonious Monk & John Coltrane, Live at Carnegie Hall Kenny Dorham, Afro Cuban Duke Ellington, Money Jungle Chick Corea, Now He Sings, Now He Sobs Grant Green & Sonny Clark, Complete Quartet Recordings (well, not a personal favorite but everyone else likes it) Tony Williams, Spring Joe Henderson, State of the Tenor Stanley Turrentine, Up at Minton's Jackie McLean, New Soil Herbie Nichols, Complete Blue Note Recordings Jimmy Smith, Back at the Chicken Shack Jimmy Smith, Midnight Special McCoy Tyner, Extensions Lou Donaldson, Blues Walk
  3. The only good thing that comes out of this for us is that the private equity guys that will own EMI will be much more interested in "leveraging" the label's assets. That may mean less reluctance to license out recordings. Guy
  4. Yikes, time to buy some of those RVGs and Connoisseurs! Guy
  5. Dissing Leonard Feather? Sounds like a magazine to read! Guy
  6. Another recording has "appeared":
  7. Interesting that Shorter ranks so low, and that Shepp ranks so high. When was the poll conducted? Was this at the end or beginning of 1966? Guy
  8. probs w/ cavs 1 aside from lebron, all their players suck
  9. Oui!! The concert was at the Olympia theater. It was the second time I heard Rollins live. First one was with his trio (with Grimes and Pete LaRoca) at the Club Saint-Germain in 1958. You lucky bastard! Guy
  10. Hearing Threadgill on tenor (I was only familiar with his flute & alto before) really reinforces the link Jim points out between Henry and 60s Sonny Rollins. Hopkins's work on "No. 2" is incredible! Guy
  11. Was Coryell the first jazz guitarist to bring 60s rock influences into the mix? (Not sure how he fits in chronologically with Gabor Szabo and Jerry Hahn.) I don't think I've ever heard the guy! re: the Mahavishnu debate, there's a well-known quote from Coryell who upon seeing John McLaughlin with the Tony Williams Lifetime, turned to his wife Julie and said "This is the best guitarist I've heard in my life!" Didn't Coryell also get into a cutting contest with Jimi Hendrix once? (With unfortunate results for Larry.) I think I read that in Stuart Nicholson's Jazz Rock book. Anyway, not my intent to diss Coryell who I am sure is a fine player. Those are just the stories I remember about him. Guy
  12. I just managed to download a copy of Don and Sonny w/Henry Grimes and Billy Higgins playing in Paris. 1963. Can't wait to hear it! Setlist: Solitude On Green Dolphin Street Announcement By S. Rollins Without A Song Sonnymoon For Two Everything Happens To Me 52nd Street Theme Brownie, were you at this gig? Guy
  13. Did it fall on top of Nancy Grace? Guy
  14. I was listening to "19th Nervous Breakdown" by the Stones today, and I'll be damned if it didn't swing quite a bit. So how about pop tunes that swing. Let's restrict it to the post-1960 -- I'm sure it's fairly easy to find examples before then. Also, let's rule out semi-jazzy artists like Frank Sinatra. Another obvious example is Van Morrison's "Moondance". Guy
  15. Celebrities at the Cavs game?!?!?
  16. I also predict that he won't be devoured by a 1500 lb hog. Guy
  17. Everything I've read suggests that this is a dubious claim. Guy
  18. Economics focus To do with the price of fish May 10th 2007 From The Economist print edition How do mobile phones promote economic growth? A new paper provides a vivid example YOU are a fisherman off the coast of northern Kerala, a region in the south of India. Visiting your usual fishing ground, you bring in an unusually good catch of sardines. That means other fishermen in the area will probably have done well too, so there will be plenty of supply at the local beach market: prices will be low, and you may not even be able to sell your catch. Should you head for the usual market anyway, or should you go down the coast in the hope that fishermen in that area will not have done so well and your fish will fetch a better price? If you make the wrong choice you cannot visit another market because fuel is costly and each market is open for only a couple of hours before dawn—and it takes that long for your boat to putter from one to the next. Since fish are perishable, any that cannot be sold will have to be dumped into the sea. This, in a nutshell, was the situation facing Kerala's fishermen until 1997. The result was far from ideal for both fishermen and their customers. In practice, fishermen chose to stick with their home markets all the time. This was wasteful because when a particular market is oversupplied, fish are thrown away, even though there may be buyers for them a little farther along the coast. On average, 5-8% of the total catch was wasted, says Robert Jensen, a development economist at Harvard University who has surveyed the price of sardines at 15 beach markets along Kerala's coast. On January 14th 1997, for example, 11 fishermen at Badagara beach ended up throwing away their catches, yet on that day there were 27 buyers at markets within 15km (about nine miles) who would have bought their fish. There were also wide variations in the price of sardines along the coast. But starting in 1997 mobile phones were introduced in Kerala. Since coverage spread gradually, this provided an ideal way to gauge the effect of mobile phones on the fishermen's behaviour, the price of fish, and the amount of waste. For many years, anecdotes have abounded about the ways in which mobile phones promote more efficient markets and encourage economic activity. One particularly popular tale is that of the fisherman who is able to call several nearby markets from his boat to establish where his catch will fetch the highest price. Mr Jensen's paper* adds some numbers to the familiar stories and shows precisely how mobile phones support economic growth. As phone coverage spread between 1997 and 2000, fishermen started to buy phones and use them to call coastal markets while still at sea. (The area of coverage reaches 20-25km off the coast.) Instead of selling their fish at beach auctions, the fishermen would call around to find the best price. Dividing the coast into three regions, Mr Jensen found that the proportion of fishermen who ventured beyond their home markets to sell their catches jumped from zero to around 35% as soon as coverage became available in each region. At that point, no fish were wasted and the variation in prices fell dramatically. By the end of the study coverage was available in all three regions. Waste had been eliminated and the “law of one price”—the idea that in an efficient market identical goods should cost the same—had come into effect, in the form of a single rate for sardines along the coast. This more efficient market benefited everyone. Fishermen's profits rose by 8% on average and consumer prices fell by 4% on average. Higher profits meant the phones typically paid for themselves within two months. And the benefits are enduring, rather than one-off. All of this, says Mr Jensen, shows the importance of the free flow of information to ensure that markets work efficiently. “Information makes markets work, and markets improve welfare,” he concludes. Mr Jensen's work is valuable because studies of the economic effect of mobile phones tend to be macroeconomic. A well known example is the finding in 2005 by Leonard Waverman, of the London Business School, that an extra 10 mobile phones per 100 people in a typical developing country leads to an additional 0.59 percentage points of growth in GDP per person. (He recently repeated this earlier study using a more elaborate model and found that an extra 10 percentage points in mobile-phone penetration led to an extra 0.44 percentage points of growth, a difference he says is not statistically significant.) Calls and effect One criticism levelled at such studies, says Mr Waverman, is that it is difficult to tell if mobile phones are promoting growth, or growth is promoting the adoption of mobile phones, as people become able to afford them. It is easy to imagine ways in which mobile phones could stimulate economic activity—they make up for poor infrastructure by substituting for travel, allow price data to be distributed and enable traders to engage with wider markets, and so on. Mr Waverman uses a variety of statistical tests to try to tease apart cause and effect. But detailed analyses of micro-market data like Mr Jensen's, he says, show how phones really do make people better off. Furthermore, says Mr Jensen, phones do this without the need for government intervention. Mobile-phone networks are built by private companies, not governments or charities, and are economically self-sustaining. Mobile operators build and run them because they make a profit doing so, and fishermen, carpenters and porters are willing to pay for the service because it increases their profits. The resulting welfare gains are indicated by the profitability of both the operators and their customers, he suggests. All governments have to do is issue licences to operators, establish a clear and transparent regulatory framework and then wait for the phones to work their economic magic. *“The Digital Provide: Information (technology), market performance and welfare in the South Indian fisheries sector”, by Robert Jensen. To be published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics, August 2007.
  19. What did Ginobili do that is suspension worthy? I know nobody outside of Spurs fans likes him, but I didn't see him do anything to merit suspension, or even a T or an ejection. Ginobili should be suspended for egregious flopping. Deserved. They definitely outplayed the Jazz -- their interior defense was stifling. If Boozer can't go to the basket, the Jazz have a hard time winning. Guy
  20. Isn't Pope still based down in Philly? Maybe somebody down there could bring up the subject with him, I'd be interested to hear his thoughts. (As well as more info on the Coltrane-Legendary Hasaan connection.) Guy
  21. BTW, I'm probably beating a dead horse at this point, but I exchanged emails with David Wild today on this subject:
  22. Spurs show why they are a championship winning machine. The unstoppable juggernaut of boredom trudges on... Those two technicals on Fisher were completely bogus. Instead, Ginobili should be suspended for the rest of the playoffs. Is Stephen Smith on drugs? WTF is wrong with that guy??? Guy
  23. Walter Davis wrote a fantastic primer on avant-garde jazz for fans of straight-ahead jazz about 10 years ago and posted it to rec.music.bluenote. I am reproducing it here:
  24. I think this is pretty extreme for someone who's not into free jazz. Guy
×
×
  • Create New...