Actually I love Andrew's piano playing and I for me it is more than just service to the composition It is certainly not virtuosic in something like a Bud Powell (for example) style...he does not spin out fast runs of notes... his solos often sound to me spare and extremely elliptical with reference to the beat... but his solos to me are riveting.... looked forward to by me... and they I don't know have some sort of inner logic. To the uninitiated I (which I am sure is not you Leeway) and even to some people who like jazz I have even heard the comment "that guy can't play" when listening to Hill solo.... I just disagree.
Actually, I feel perpetually uninitiated . As I said in my earlier post, I think Hill was "a fine pianist." My point was that I feel that Hill was more interested in getting his compositions played in the way he heard them, than in the pianism itself. I could be over-valuing the former and under-valuing the latter, but I do kind of see it, and hear, it that way, based not just on PoD but on the body of his work. And I think that body of work will endure. That is a substantial achievement.
I agree with your opinion that composition and the way his music was played seemed to be more important to Andrew Hill than just being a pianist. Then again, only Andrew Hill knew what the real story was.