Thanks, Mark. I've never studied music, so it's interesting to read something like that and compare it to my impressions of what I hear. I take it that Ornette plays a melody, but doesn't link it to an underlying chord structure - the melody's just hanging out there, to be appreciated for it's own sake. Well, OK, I like tone and logic as much as anybody. But music's like a parfait - it's all the ingredients, and how they mesh together, and how it's baked. In much of Ornette's music, when I listen to the whole song, my impressions are "OK, what's the bass doing? What's the drum doing? How do they relate to the sax or the trumpet?" It's almost like, as long as they stick to the same tempo, they could be in separate rooms, each doing their own thing. And how can a music that the composer insists is so melodic be so unmelodious?
And is it possible that in harmony there is warmth? People often say that Ornette's playing is like a cry (which I can hear) or happiness (I don't hear a lot of that). But I don't know that music that tries to be so singular can really convey a sound of commonality or geniality. I wonder whether Liebman's album attempts, through the addition of harmony, to add warmth and approachability to Ornette's compositions. I'd be curious to hear it, and to compare the tracks to Ornette's originals.
I guess I like song structure. I like knowing what the band is trying to accomplish. With Ornette's music, I'm left unmoved - at the end of a song, I'm no different than I was at the beginning.