Big Beat Steve Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 20 hours ago, Late said: Let us know what you think! (Was the harpsichord necessary?) Sooo ...@Late: What are YOUR impressions of the presence of the harpsichord on that album, then? Quote
Kevin Bresnahan Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 43 minutes ago, Big Beat Steve said: Sooo ...@Late: What are YOUR impressions of the presence of the harpsichord on that album, then? It has to be better than this! Quote
Late Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 22 hours ago, Big Beat Steve said: ...I do not find that thing that sounds like an amplified harpsichord here (unusual...) all that disturbing. Not necessary but not all that unpleasant....the jazzier licks (at times almost organ-like) that come from the harpsichord here are OK and do not bother me. I'd echo this sentiment. Not necessary, but not unpleasant. But I do wonder who (Bob Thiele?) thought: "Waitaminute! I know! Let's use harpsichord instead of piano! Yeah! People will go crazy for that! We're gonna have a new jazz hit!" 😜 I wish there were a Ben Webster Impulse! date with Gary McFarland arrangements. And Bill Evans on piano. I think Ben played better—or perhaps was more inspired—when placed in a setting that was harmonically challenging. I could see McFarland pulling that off while still giving Webster room to be himself. Quote
EKE BBB Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago On 3/22/2026 at 10:30 AM, Big Beat Steve said: Same for the "Ben Webster Meets Don Byas" of which I obtained a SABA original. After having read what's been written about this session in the Don Byas biography I think you cannot help listening to this record with somewhat "different" (or should I say "nuanced" ) ears. In his biography of Ben Webster, Frank Büchman-Møller is very dismissive of that disc, qualifying it as "(...)- with the exception of a couple of musical highlights- a disappointment, as neither soloist played up to par, and the rhythm section consisting of Tete Montoliu, Peter Trunk and Al Heath never merge as hoped". Then, Büchman-Møller states that the album demostrates how differently the two saxophonists had developed from the same background, with Coleman Hawkins as the primary reference. I cannot concur with the first statement, of course. Quote
Big Beat Steve Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 4 minutes ago, EKE BBB said: In his biography of Ben Webster, Frank Büchman-Møller is very dismissive of that disc, qualifying it as "(...)- with the exception of a couple of musical highlights- a disappointment, as neither soloist played up to par, and the rhythm section consisting of Tete Montoliu, Peter Trunk and Al Heath never merge as hoped". Then, Büchman-Møller states that the album demostrates how differently the two saxophonists had developed from the same background, with Coleman Hawkins as the primary reference. I cannot concur with the first statement, of course. So Büchmann-Møller did not dwell on the clash of personalities or animosities that seems to have developed between Webster and Byas during that session (as Con Chapman explained in his Byas biography)? It seems easy to imagine that they were not at their top on that occasion, given these problems. Will try to listen to that disc with a "blank sheet" approach anyway. @Late: Thanks for your feedback. Quote
EKE BBB Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, Big Beat Steve said: So Büchmann-Møller did not dwell on the clash of personalities or animosities that seems to have developed between Webster and Byas during that session (as Con Chapman explained in his Byas biography)? It seems easy to imagine that they were not at their top on that occasion, given these problems. Will try to listen to that disc with a "blank sheet" approach anyway. A perfect disc to listen to with a blank sheet approach is "Sonny Meets Hawk!". I have read somewhat opposed reviews as regards how Sonny Rollins challenged Hawk. Quote
Caravan Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, Big Beat Steve said: So Büchmann-Møller did not dwell on the clash of personalities or animosities that seems to have developed between Webster and Byas during that session (as Con Chapman explained in his Byas biography)? It seems easy to imagine that they were not at their top on that occasion, given these problems. Will try to listen to that disc with a "blank sheet" approach anyway. @Late: Thanks for your feedback. They were both juiced, which was their 'natural' state at the time (late 1960s). I've seen them many times, on and off stage, both alone and together. Ben became slow (and sentimental), but Don could still play his ass off even when he hardly could stand upright. He drank three double whiskys and smoke a big reefer anyway before playing at all. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.