Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • soulpope

    9559

  • Peter Friedman

    8714

  • HutchFan

    8614

  • jazzbo

    7112

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

John SurmanFlashpoint: NDR Jazz Workshop – April '69 (Cuneiform Records)

MI0003127276.jpg?partner=allrovi.com

Personnel: 
John Surman: soprano and baritone saxophones; Alan Skidmore: tenor saxophone, flute; Ronnie Scott: tenor saxophone; Mike Osborne: alto saxophone; Malcolm Griffiths: trombone; Erich Kleinschuster: trombone; Kenny Wheeler: trumpet, flugelhorn; Fritz Pauer: piano; Harry Miller: bass; Alan Jackson: drums.
 

Posted (edited)

R-4318656-1392235257-2177.jpeg.jpg

Martial Solal Trio with Peter Erskine & Marc Johnson - Triangle (JMS) 

 

 

2 hours ago, sidewinder said:

R-2771689-1300317111.jpeg.jpg

I wish that CD was still available.  It's now fetching absurdly high prices from resellers.

Edited by HutchFan
Posted
2 hours ago, JSngry said:

MI0000636355.jpg

Still seems like an unlikely partnership to me, unlikely as hell, but Warne seems really comfortable and good things always happen when that happens.

Going again. Warne...that guy was a master, not a "master", a master. And if you just listen for sweat, you'll probably not hear any of it. But if it's water you're looking for, you'll have drinks forever.

Posted

51HZVFYBzkL._SS500.jpg

Warne is still Warne, but this Pete Christlieb guy, there's always been something that puts me off him,  and hearing him besides Warne finally brought it into focus - the motherfucker sounds like a tenor version of Phil Woods, not the earlier Phil Woods, but the later one, the one that I have to respect but I don't have to like, which is good, because I don't like it, not from Phil Woods, nor from Pete Christlieb. No sir, I don't like it, not one bit.

But Warne, Warne is as close to omniscient as anybody can be. Warne does not sound at all like Phil Woods, early, middle, or later. Warne did not have time for that.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, JSngry said:

51HZVFYBzkL._SS500.jpg

Warne is still Warne, but this Pete Christlieb guy, there's always been something that puts me off him,  and hearing him besides Warne finally brought it into focus - the motherfucker sounds like a tenor version of Phil Woods, not the earlier Phil Woods, but the later one, the one that I have to respect but I don't have to like, which is good, because I don't like it, not from Phil Woods, nor from Pete Christlieb. No sir, I don't like it, not one bit.

But Warne, Warne is as close to omniscient as anybody can be. Warne does not sound at all like Phil Woods, early, middle, or later. Warne did not have time for that.

 

The Christlieb/Woods linkage -- he shoots, he scores.

BTW, I was listening today to some of the Benny Carter/Wloods album "My Man Benny, My Man Phil" (MusicMasters, 1989). Carter, at age 82, is in great form, but when Woods starts to growl, chortle, etc., I'm at a loss. What happened to the excellent Woods of 1957 and earlier and why did it happen? I guess we'll never know. (BTW, some of the Woods solo work on the Oliver Nelson Mosaic set is relatively  sober and quite good. In those instances, I suspect, the lucid complexity of Nelson's writing served as a guiding, restraining influence.

Posted
3 hours ago, Larry Kart said:

. (BTW, some of the Woods solo work on the Oliver Nelson Mosaic set is relatively  sober and quite good. In those instances, I suspect, the lucid complexity of Nelson's writing served as a guiding, restraining influence.

Woods also turns in some truly excellent lead playing on those sessions. The artistry of that part of his craft never left him. As for the soloing, it seems that after he repatriated, after he did the L.A. thing with the Pete Robinson band and it got cold-shouldered, perhaps that was his Pet Sounds or River Deep, Mountain High, some kind of bruise that he never got over. Seems like he realized that he was not going to be accepted as hip/forward thinking (and I think it was not so much that he thought he would be, just that he wanted to be given credit for making a serious and sincere effort to keep moving ahead instead of people saying hey Phil Woods, why are you playing all this weird electronic shit?), so he became kinda passive-aggressive retro-hipster, which certainly served him well in terms of stability and reputation of a certain sort, but geez, such a lead player, always! But the soloing...maybe there's a bitterness there that was being redirected so as not to appear as bitter as it was?

But yeah, Nelson touched a lot of people, both through his writing, his life, and woefully abrupt ending of all of that.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...