Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

But just as Mount Everest continues to tempt expert climbers, “Stardust” has a combination of otherworldly beauty and technical challenge that has made it incredibly alluring to generation after generation of musicians and vocalists. While we don’t have the time or space to rank the over 1,500 renditions of “Stardust” that have been recorded, here’s a list of fifty that climb to significantly higher elevations than Dylan’s version — and, just so we don’t completely pile on the poor guy, we’ve picked out another three that barely make it out of base camp.

Read more: http://forward.com/culture/365856/50-cover-versions-of-stardust-that-are-better-than-bob-dylans-and-three-tha/

Posted

Don Byas tops them all, Minton's, on the Esoteric/Everest/Whatever Charlie Christian album.

It was kind of a set piece for him, but the one that made Side 2, Cut 1 of that LP is one of the great performances of the 20th Century, period.

Posted

I'm eager to hear the (already maligned!) Dylan version, my copy of "Triplicate" is on a truck bound to me later today.

I confess that Nat King Cole's version on Capitol really moves me. . . especially when he sings "But that was long ago. . . " That phrase the way he phrases it evokes memories in me that are both tender and sad. Which is a good way for Stardust to be experienced.

Posted

Shouldn't a Dylan standards record be named Hubris?

I'm not sure if it was an insult or a joke, but someone gave me that Dylan Christmas CD for Christmas--definitively the worst piece of musical sh-t I've ever heard. 

 

 

 

Posted (edited)

Haters gonna hate I guess. Personally I like most of the Xmas album and have liked the two "standards" discs released prior to today's. I know neither is a "popular" opinion.

Edited by jazzbo
Posted

If you're gonna listen to Dylan for "music", you might as well read Shakespeare for the pictures.

The guy is a great concept, sometimes brilliantly executed. But always a concept first.

I also think he's a comedic, if not genius, then pretty close to it. That's not an insult either, not even, especially sine that's not what he set out to be. It's like he gradually but inevitably realized that that was what he was best at, and what he could do as a life's work, so he embraced that and never looked back. I mean, sure, he's got his serious side, but so did Red Skelton. What does that prove?

Posted
1 hour ago, jazzbo said:

Haters gonna hate I guess. Personally I like most of the Xmas album and have liked the two "standards" discs released prior to today's. I know neither is a "popular" opinion.

Your secret identity as Bob Dylan's mother has been revealed.

Posted
On 3/31/2017 at 11:03 AM, mjzee said:

But just as Mount Everest continues to tempt expert climbers, “Stardust” has a combination of otherworldly beauty and technical challenge that has made it incredibly alluring to generation after generation of musicians and vocalists. While we don’t have the time or space to rank the over 1,500 renditions of “Stardust” that have been recorded, here’s a list of fifty that climb to significantly higher elevations than Dylan’s version — and, just so we don’t completely pile on the poor guy, we’ve picked out another three that barely make it out of base camp.

Read more: http://forward.com/culture/365856/50-cover-versions-of-stardust-that-are-better-than-bob-dylans-and-three-tha/

That was fun!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...