mjzee Posted March 31, 2017 Report Share Posted March 31, 2017 But just as Mount Everest continues to tempt expert climbers, “Stardust” has a combination of otherworldly beauty and technical challenge that has made it incredibly alluring to generation after generation of musicians and vocalists. While we don’t have the time or space to rank the over 1,500 renditions of “Stardust” that have been recorded, here’s a list of fifty that climb to significantly higher elevations than Dylan’s version — and, just so we don’t completely pile on the poor guy, we’ve picked out another three that barely make it out of base camp. Read more: http://forward.com/culture/365856/50-cover-versions-of-stardust-that-are-better-than-bob-dylans-and-three-tha/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Stryker Posted March 31, 2017 Report Share Posted March 31, 2017 I wrote a piece for the Detroit Free Press about "Stardust"(nee "Star Dust") in 2002, when the song turned 75. Doug Ramsey reprinted it a few years back on his blog with permission. I included a list of 10 notable or curious versions at the end. http://www.artsjournal.com/rifftides/2011/12/correspondence-on-hoagy.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSngry Posted March 31, 2017 Report Share Posted March 31, 2017 Don Byas tops them all, Minton's, on the Esoteric/Everest/Whatever Charlie Christian album. It was kind of a set piece for him, but the one that made Side 2, Cut 1 of that LP is one of the great performances of the 20th Century, period. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jazzbo Posted March 31, 2017 Report Share Posted March 31, 2017 I'm eager to hear the (already maligned!) Dylan version, my copy of "Triplicate" is on a truck bound to me later today. I confess that Nat King Cole's version on Capitol really moves me. . . especially when he sings "But that was long ago. . . " That phrase the way he phrases it evokes memories in me that are both tender and sad. Which is a good way for Stardust to be experienced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSngry Posted March 31, 2017 Report Share Posted March 31, 2017 Helen Humes floating: Bob Freedman's wonderful chart, neither fucked up nor enhanced by Wynton,: This was a hit, I think. I know it stayed in print fordamnever! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kh1958 Posted March 31, 2017 Report Share Posted March 31, 2017 Shouldn't a Dylan standards record be named Hubris? I'm not sure if it was an insult or a joke, but someone gave me that Dylan Christmas CD for Christmas--definitively the worst piece of musical sh-t I've ever heard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jazzbo Posted March 31, 2017 Report Share Posted March 31, 2017 (edited) Haters gonna hate I guess. Personally I like most of the Xmas album and have liked the two "standards" discs released prior to today's. I know neither is a "popular" opinion. Edited March 31, 2017 by jazzbo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John L Posted March 31, 2017 Report Share Posted March 31, 2017 I am certainly not a Dylan hater by any means, but I really couldn't get with the Xmas album at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSngry Posted March 31, 2017 Report Share Posted March 31, 2017 If you're gonna listen to Dylan for "music", you might as well read Shakespeare for the pictures. The guy is a great concept, sometimes brilliantly executed. But always a concept first. I also think he's a comedic, if not genius, then pretty close to it. That's not an insult either, not even, especially sine that's not what he set out to be. It's like he gradually but inevitably realized that that was what he was best at, and what he could do as a life's work, so he embraced that and never looked back. I mean, sure, he's got his serious side, but so did Red Skelton. What does that prove? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kh1958 Posted March 31, 2017 Report Share Posted March 31, 2017 1 hour ago, jazzbo said: Haters gonna hate I guess. Personally I like most of the Xmas album and have liked the two "standards" discs released prior to today's. I know neither is a "popular" opinion. Your secret identity as Bob Dylan's mother has been revealed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John L Posted March 31, 2017 Report Share Posted March 31, 2017 I'll go with Louis Armstrong's 1931 versions, both takes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danasgoodstuff Posted April 1, 2017 Report Share Posted April 1, 2017 On 3/31/2017 at 11:03 AM, mjzee said: But just as Mount Everest continues to tempt expert climbers, “Stardust” has a combination of otherworldly beauty and technical challenge that has made it incredibly alluring to generation after generation of musicians and vocalists. While we don’t have the time or space to rank the over 1,500 renditions of “Stardust” that have been recorded, here’s a list of fifty that climb to significantly higher elevations than Dylan’s version — and, just so we don’t completely pile on the poor guy, we’ve picked out another three that barely make it out of base camp. Read more: http://forward.com/culture/365856/50-cover-versions-of-stardust-that-are-better-than-bob-dylans-and-three-tha/ That was fun! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmonahan Posted April 1, 2017 Report Share Posted April 1, 2017 Always liked Sinatra's version of the verse alone for Reprise. gregmo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.