felser Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 9 hours ago, Holy Ghost said: Yep. Tremendous set for all the right reasons. Like Jack very much here too One of my two or three favorite McLean albums, which is saying a lot. Quote
Holy Ghost Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 53 minutes ago, felser said: One of my two or three favorite McLean albums, which is saying a lot. Same for me. Quote
ep1str0phy Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Yeah, Jacknife is the one I go to after the Moncur/Hutcherson groups. It's very early for DeJohnette, but his playing animates what might have otherwise been a routine session. I like the "Is" Sessions double CD, too. The music seems to occupy a midway point between the Lost Quintet and Circle. The energy is off the charts, even if the improvisations can feel a little incoherent at times. IMO the real knock on the recording is that the music lacks a guiding voice - there's no Miles to editorialize the rambling or a Cecil or Braxton to give the freedom explicit direction. It's a transitional moment for virtually everyone involved. Quote
clifford_thornton Posted 1 hour ago Author Report Posted 1 hour ago Jack is also on Corea’s The Sun, which is a little more concise. Is feels more like a search down various tributaries, which is interesting even if not all of those tributaries bear obvious fruit. Quote
Niko Posted 36 minutes ago Report Posted 36 minutes ago I played Jackie McLean's Demon Dance these days, it's another McLean favorite with great DeJohnette... Quote
ep1str0phy Posted 31 minutes ago Report Posted 31 minutes ago (edited) That's also a really good one. I like the push-and-pull of Grossman nudging the music into Coltrane territory and the rhythm section vacillating between modalism and abstraction. There's something special about this period in the music. There's just so much crossover in the interval between roughly '65 and the early 1970s, where the boundaries between mainstream and fringe felt porous and mutable. And there were so many sub-factors influencing the development of the music, like the death of Coltrane, the exodus of American jazz musicians to Europe (and vice-versa), the cross-pollination of ideas from Europe, South Africa, Latin America, etc., monumental political upheaval throughout the world, and so on. Our reading of this music is (almost by necessity) informed by historical understanding, as so much of it went undocumented and what we do have in hand has been litigated in writing and discussion for over half a century. I know that some of the board members were there. As far as I know, however, so many of the inherited biases of 21st century jazz friction against the reality of what was happening at that time. Edited 30 minutes ago by ep1str0phy Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.