I have to agree. If lotteries were set up so there were say, 2500 winners of $100,000 apiece instead of one $250,000,000 winner, I'd be more likely to play them. Better odds, more winners, and not enough money to completely destroy your life as you know it sounds like a better system to me. But then, I guess they pull more money in with these large, impossible to win prizes. After all, as I've heard many times, the lotto is for people who don't understand math...