Thank you, Jazzmoose.
I am arguing that there isn't sufficient proof he used steroids.
Secondly, I am arguing that steroids create muscle mass, not HR hitters.
Thirdly, I am arguing that even if true, steroids or strength do not compensate for vision, timing and skill. Hence, HRs are not the automatic result of their use.
Lastly, [and why this is such a hard sell, I will never know] all of us are accorded the same constitutional privilege as a Barry Bonds: The right to a fair trial and a right to have his case heard by a court of law...and not by tried in the court of public opinion.
Our laws require hard evidence, not innuendo or supposition. To assume less, even for Bonds, is to undermine the very rights we all covet for ourselves.
I simply cannot make it any more plain then that.
Hmm. Well, I'm with you on two all the way. And three should be obvious to anyone who has seen Hank Aaron. And I understand your 'lastly' point, and hear where you're coming from. But it's always fun to speculate and discuss things, and as far as speculating and discussing, your "one" is full of shit. But have fun!