Jump to content

JSngry

Moderator
  • Posts

    86,214
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by JSngry

  1. http://www.youtube.c...h?v=TtV3lx4eT5w
  2. That's more than I knew before, but how does a song title & "sessions" fit together discussing concert footage?
  3. I don't know what that means. Please elucidate.
  4. How do you get an emoticon to link to a hyperlink?
  5. Uh yeah, ok. What other kind of immigrant in Arizona would be a ready-reference vis-a-vis having a complaint? You really can do better than this, at least I hope so. And btw - I live in Texas, and will soon heading out to play a city-sponsored Cinco de Mayo gig in the heart of downtown Dallas. I've been advised to leave the house early to allow time to navigate through the picket lines protesting the Arizona law. I'll give them the thumbs up. Hope you enjoy living in Maine!
  6. How long did the concert last? Or more to the point, how long did each song last? I've heard stories of her going hours on end, but whether that was for one song or for the whole show, I'm not certain.
  7. Thank you for noticing that derailing a frivolous thread is a foregone conclusion!
  8. Kate says: My life expectancy is 31. I'm 29. So that's two years of parties, extreme sports and romance... Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-517754/Living-cystic-fibrosis-My-life-expectancy-31-Im-29-So-thats-years-parties-extreme-sports-romance-.html#ixzz0mh9pHnZd
  9. Oh, so you're publicly comparing yourself to an illegal immigrant? You're implying that you're living in a state of illegality? You're admitting by implication to legally prosecutable behavior? You're positing yourself as Allen Lowe = Technically A Criminal? Nice... Dude - get a clue on how this shit actually works, and then plan a strategy, ok? Your cause is quite just, but your strategy is pretty much imbecilic.
  10. Retail? $40.00 http://www.mouthpieceexpress.com/catalog/index2.php?cPath=197_213_214_683 And those are pretty basic, stock mouthpieces, and that is a "good price". There is much more that can be spent: http://www.mouthpieceexpress.com/catalog/index2.php?cPath=197_213_638_636
  11. If the image was from The Joy of Sex, as was alluded to somewhere, then classifying it as "pornography" is indeed pretty absurd. No question. But...context is everything, no? And in a satiric thread about The Glorious Whiteness Music Of Kate Smith, I don't know that such an image "works" as well as does the velveteen image of a faceless copulation (maybe it's seeing the faces of people as they fuck that upsets people that extra bit) from the inside of a Herbie Mann album does in the context of a sexy album cover thread. or any other thread dedicated to sexy/sexual images on album covers. Hell, the sexy album cover thread comes with a warning that there are sexually explicit images present. The last thing anybody would expect to find in the other thread is a picture of two people intercoursing. Removing the image was a judgment call, as was labeling it "pornographic" (and even that has been removed now, no?). The first can be reasonably defended, the second...not so much. Not at all, really. No matter. If your reputation via Internet search engines is what you're concerned about, the issue could have been pursued privately (& aggressively) w/o leaving the cyber-equivalent of a paper trail, which is exactly what is being created through these discussions. You can argue principle all you want, but the reality of how what you're concerned about actually works operates quite apart from those principles. If you got a beef with that, don't expect resolution here. You're gonna have to go to Mr. Internet to get that one fixed, and last I heard, ain't nobody getting in to see him. So play with the deck on the table, not the one you wished was on the table. "Cause that deck ain't gonna make it here any time soon.
  12. The ironic thing is that the worries about being linked to being a pornographer thru Google & such only increase the more the issue is discussed. If the concerns would have been discussed via PM there would be virtually no possible linkage whatsoever.
  13. Indeed it is!
  14. I make no claim at eve a superficial "understanding" of this music. But there's a level at which I'm pretty sure I get it. I mean, DAMN!!!
  15. Careful, you'll put out an eye!
  16. Ok, yeah, I've got it,,,just never opened it (somebody was generous with providing burns to tide me over) & its not filed right. But it's here, just like I knew it should have been. Sleep tight tonite!
  17. Was the OTC box ever available commercially, if only momentarily?
  18. I recently "found" both of those Blue Mitchell RCAs - the internet's your friend, ya'know - and I enjoy them both. Sometimes the material is, uh...."weak", but the shit always is in the pocket in a very nice, mellow, Blue Mitchell-y kind of way. And Harol Land doesn't compromise his concept one iota. So you got these grooves going on and Harold is all chromatic & pentatonic with that idyosyncratic pitch and tome of his, and I'm all like, hey, that was when producers were content leaving well enough alone & letting everybody get some kind of win out of the deal. Many people have made far worse records trying to do the same thing. Or even worse, trying to to the same thing without understanding what that "thing" is - and could be.
  19. Duke Pearson was a bad cat. He made it sound easy (and he makes it sound like a bigger group than it is...), but you get to taking those charts apart & you realize that the man had some SKILLS!!!
  20. Mr. Love is far from alone in becoming disillusioned as the inner workings of "the business" reveal themselves in increasingly greater detail. You think the taste left in your mouth was bad? Trust me on this one.
  21. James Garner Garner Ted Armstrong Stanley Rader
×
×
  • Create New...