I mentioned I another thread that I've been talking to Michael Cuscuna about "things Blue Note & Mosaic" and what I am hearing from him about how Blue Note feels about the board is very disappointing... and no, I am not going to be calling Tom any more about it.... well, maybe I won't. Anyhow, from Michael's comments, it seems that Blue Note isn't particularly worried. In fact, Michael still talks like the board was taken down to "improve" it. They are acting like the new board will open in May and all will click on over there like someone who just had a new house built. I have my doubts that anything they do will be that mind-boggling, but that's what I'm hearing from Michael. Are they simply that naive?? Maybe. Are we over-reacting to a redesigned board? Quite possibly. Is steve(thelil) really able to post with both hands... never mind.
I do have to add that getting mad is perfectly understandable... I gather that Blue Note isn't particularly worried about us. Has anyone ever gotten an e-mail from them about the whole fiasco?? I used to get e-mails every two weeks or so. We have been kept in the dark about this, that is certain.
However, I still see no reason to boycott Blue Note or Mosaic. I buy Blue Note CDs and Mosaic box sets for ME, not the company. If I boycott these record labels, I'm the only one being punished by preventing myself from hearing some great music. Blue Note has proved, to me at least, that my one or two CD per month habit means diddly-squat to them. Mosaic is a different story. They won't survive if enough core customers stop buying stuff. I don't equate Mosaic & Blue Note. They had absolutely nothing to do with what BN did to their board. I don't even think Cuscuna could have called them and asked them to do it differently. They didn't ask anyone, they just did it.
Sure, I am mad... I am also sad... I am also confused. You see, I have met Tom many times. I will continue to hold out some hope that Tom may let me know the whats and whys of what he did but as time moves on, it looks like I thought too highly of our relationship. I guess an electrical engineer with a fascination with Jazz doesn't place me too highly in the Rolodex of record label execs (sniff...). Although, to plump up my ego a bit, Michael was just asking me what SACD player I recommended.
Also, I have to say that I think Blue Note's reissue program is fine with me. They have and continue to have a successful way to get customers to buy their product. We went over this on the BN board a lot, but I'll ask again: If someone here, a Jazz fanatic, is standing in a CD store with $20 in their pocket with the intention of spending that $20 on one CD and they have one BN Connoisseur CD and one OJC "Limited Edition" CD in each hand, which one are you going to buy first (assuming that they are both high on your want list)? My answer is, and always has been, the Blue Note Connoisseur. I know that it ain't out forever. OJC's unlimited limited editions actually hurt their sales in my opinion.
Lastly, I do agree that the US policy on copyrights (75 years after the owner's death) is a bit rediculous. However, don't act like this only benefits the record labels!! The artists' estates get royalties the whole time a copyrighted performance is released and sold. Artists and/or their estates get diddly-squat when their work goes out of copyright and is sold. In a nutshell, Ike Quebec's estate got some money from BN Japan when they reissued Ike's 40's material. Ike's estate got nothing when Classics put it out.
Later,
Kevin