catesta Posted August 11, 2004 Report Posted August 11, 2004 DEEP if here, would probably say, Booker Ervin. B-) Quote
WD45 Posted August 11, 2004 Report Posted August 11, 2004 For single mmost identifiable, I would go with Stanley Turrentine as well. Quote
wesbed Posted August 11, 2004 Report Posted August 11, 2004 Jackie Mclean is VERY recognizable for me. Quote
MartyJazz Posted August 11, 2004 Report Posted August 11, 2004 (edited) There are many players that I and many of us on this board can spot immediately. However, since Dan asks us to just pick one, I'd have to say in my case it would be Sonny Rollins, in all his tonal manifestations from the '50s through the present day. In the spirit however of most who have responded here with a plethora of heavyweights and keeping in mind JSngry's point that there are also quite a number of players who haven't achieved giant stature yet nevertheless have made their mark by having developed a unique, musically interesting sound, I would also nominate this mix of musicians: Bennie Wallace Anthony Braxton (on alto only) Harold Land John Tchicai Sam Rivers (tenor only altho his soprano sound is generally distinctive) George Adams Artie Shaw Obviously, I'm more confident with the reed players. We all realize, don't we, that Dan is compiling this list so that he can try to f**k each of us up on his next BFT. Edited August 11, 2004 by MartyJazz Quote
brownie Posted August 11, 2004 Report Posted August 11, 2004 If the choice is down to one, Prez gets my vote! Instant recognition! Instant gratification! Quote
Miles251 Posted August 11, 2004 Report Posted August 11, 2004 I'm glad to see CT on this list. I usually can identify Clark after a couple of notes. He was "my man" as I grew into being a trumpet player/musician. Thanks to Free For All, Blue Mitchell became instantly recognizable, not only for his sound but his soulfulness as well. I think Lester Bowie also has a very unique sound, not to mention approach and should be included on my "trumpet only" list and I can always indentify Dave Douglas from a mile away. I would also add Paul Smoker to my list...man, HUGE sound and an undeniably unique vocabulary! Quote
Alon Marcus Posted August 11, 2004 Report Posted August 11, 2004 I think it depends very much on the instrument - you need to hear pianists and drumers "speak" a few phrases before recognizing. With wind istruments it's much easier for me : Coltrane, Miles, Steve Lacy, Stan Getz Also guitarists have very distinctive tones because it depends on many unrelated factors: Playing with a pick/thumb/fingerstyle, the place where they produce the sound with the right hand (close or far to the neck), use of legato, type of guitar (electric acoustic), use of effects and etc. Metheny, Scofield, Wes, Jim Hall all have very personal sound. Quote
Spontooneous Posted August 11, 2004 Report Posted August 11, 2004 We're three pages into this and nobody's mentioned Coleman Hawkins! The godfather of all saxophone tone. Another one you can recognize right from the first note. Quote
John L Posted August 11, 2004 Report Posted August 11, 2004 I am tempted to join Brownie and pick Pres. But what about Bechet and Ayler? How can a tone be more distinctive than that? Quote
Sundog Posted August 11, 2004 Report Posted August 11, 2004 A few others... Paul Desmond, Charlie Christian, Shelly Manne. If I have to pick one it's got the be Charlie. Quote
Brad Posted August 11, 2004 Report Posted August 11, 2004 If it's only one, it's Bird but Monk is a close second. No one sounds or sounded like him. Quote
wolff Posted August 11, 2004 Report Posted August 11, 2004 I still can recall when I first noticed their unique sound. Number one: Hodges...even if you are deaf. Armstrong Hawkins Basie Morgan I like listening to those Verve/Clef ballad medleys. Individual tone/sound is really in stark relief Quote
paul secor Posted August 11, 2004 Report Posted August 11, 2004 Cecil Taylor hasn't been mentioned, and he's very recognizable to me. Billie Holiday, while not an instrumentalist as such, was most definitely a musician, and is very recognizable. Quote
montg Posted August 11, 2004 Report Posted August 11, 2004 I started the car today and turned on the local jazz station--almost instantly I recognized Art Tatum. A few bars later a trumpter entered and it was immediately clear the player was Roy Eldridge. It's a truism--the greats really do have unique and identifiable tones (and phrasings) as this thread attests. I suppose it's a cliche to say this, but the dificulty I have with a lot of the university-trained players today is that they all sound so similar. But maybe if I listened to the new guys more (which I'm trying to do) I could pick up some of the identifiers. Quote
John L Posted August 11, 2004 Report Posted August 11, 2004 People are interpreting the question in different ways. There are a lot of artist who are highly distinctive and always recognizable not because of their tone, but because of their phrasing, their rhythm, their overall approach to improvisation. I would put Monk, Cecil Taylor, Charlie Parker, and John Coltrane in that category, for example. Not that Bird and Trane didn't have great individual tone. But I would say that their genius lay elsewhere. Other artists like Ayler, Bechet, Webster, Pres, Getz, Hodges, Lockjaw et al hit you right away with tone alone. That was a huge part of the whole package. Quote
jazzbo Posted August 11, 2004 Report Posted August 11, 2004 Monk hits me with TONE, one note from Monk can usually signal "Monk in da house." His very touch, the very positioning of his body, I don't know, maybe the HAT, something makes him that distinctive, at least to my ears. Quote
John L Posted August 12, 2004 Report Posted August 12, 2004 (edited) Monk hits me with TONE, one note from Monk can usually signal "Monk in da house."Â His very touch, the very positioning of his body, I don't know, maybe the HAT, something makes him that distinctive, at least to my ears. Lon: Would you really recognize Monk for the tone of one note, or for the specific note that was chosen and the place that he decided to put it? I would think the latter for myself. Edited August 12, 2004 by John L Quote
BruceH Posted August 12, 2004 Report Posted August 12, 2004 People are interpreting the question in different ways. There are a lot of artist who are highly distinctive and always recognizable not because of their tone, but because of their phrasing, their rhythm, their overall approach to improvisation. I would put Monk, Cecil Taylor, Charlie Parker, and John Coltrane in that category, for example. Not that Bird and Trane didn't have great individual tone. But I would say that their genius lay elsewhere. Other artists like Ayler, Bechet, Webster, Pres, Getz, Hodges, Lockjaw et al hit you right away with tone alone. That was a huge part of the whole package. Very right. (Add Desmond and Artie Shaw in the 'tone' category and I'm with you 100%.) Quote
Free For All Posted August 12, 2004 Report Posted August 12, 2004 Have Jug and Arnette Cobb been mentioned? Quote
Free For All Posted August 12, 2004 Report Posted August 12, 2004 Of course his tone is most recognizable 'cause there's two or three at once! Quote
Jim Dye Posted August 12, 2004 Report Posted August 12, 2004 Steve Lacy! Absolutely! When I think of a recognizable tone, Steve Lacy is the one who stands out. Quote
LAL Posted August 12, 2004 Report Posted August 12, 2004 Whether from their tone, rhythm, phrasing etc, these are the musicians I recognise easily (and who always have an impact on me): Alto: Benny Carter and Hodges Tenor: Hawk and Pres Soprano: Sidney Bechet Trumpet: Satch, Kid Thomas (that jabbing trumpet sound-unmistakable) I find it impossible to pick out any of the drummers and bassists (probably haven't been paying enough attention to them). Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.