Jump to content

Sports: 2006 NBA Play-Off Pool


Recommended Posts

1 ST ROUND

80 POINTS POSSIBLE IN 1 ST ROUND

(8 SERIES @ 5 POINTS PER SERIES) + (8 BULLS-EYES @ 5 POINTS PER SERIES)

SA - 6

DALLAS - 4

LAC - 5

PHX - 7

DET - 5

CLEV - 6

NJ- 6

MIAMI - 6

_________________________________

CONN 66 POINTS 83 % = B

BRUCE 65 POINTS 81 % = B -

DARKO 20/20 61 POINTS 76 % = C

SS1 60 POINTS 75 % = C

GUY 56 POINTS 70 % = C -

NOJJJ - 55 POINTS = 69 % = D +

HOLYSTITT 52 POINTS 65 % = D

2 ND ROUND

60 POINTS POSSIBLE IN 2 ND ROUND

(4 SERIES @ 10 POINTS PER SERIES) + (4 BULLS-EYES @ 5 POINTS PER SERIES)

DALLAS - 7

PHX - 7

DET - 7

MIAMI - 5

CONN + 66 POINTS

BRUCE + 65 POINTS

DARKO 20/20 + 61 POINTS

SS1 28 (2ND ROUND) + 60 POINTS (1ST ROUND)= 88 POINTS

GUY + 56 POINTS

HOLYSTITT + 52 POINTS

NOJJJ + 55 POINTS

3 RD ROUND

40 POINTS POSSIBLE IN 3 RD ROUND

(2 SERIES @ 15 POINTS PER SERIES) + (2 BULLS-EYES @ 5 POINTS PER SERIES)

4 TH ROUND

25 POINTS POSSIBLE IN 4 TH ROUND (NBA FINALS)

(1 SERIES @ 20 POINTS PER SERIES) + (1 BULLS-EYES @ 5 POINTS PER SERIES)

West

SA

Queens

Dallas

Memphis

Denver

LA Clippers

Phoenix

The 08's

East

Detroit

Mil

The LeBron's

Washington

NJ

Indiana

Miami

Chicago

Scoring System

Series

05 points for 1st round winners x 8 teams = 40 points possible

10 points for 2nd round winners x 4 teams = 40 points possible

15 points for 3rd round winners x 2 teams = 30 points possible

20 points for 4th round winner X 1 team = 20 points possible

130 points possible for the series winners

Number Of Games Per Series

All Series Same Point Total

5 points for bull-eye

3 points within 1 game

1 point within 2 games

Edited by Soulstation1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 953
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

guy's pick

1st round -- pretty boring this year.

San Antonio (1) vs. Sacramento (8): San Antonio won't have too many difficulties. Spurs in 4.

Phoenix (2) vs. Lakers (7): Kobe's dangerous, but his team is too weak. Suns in 5.

Denver (3) vs. Clippers (6): Probably the only remotely interesting series in the 1st round. Gotta go with the home court advantage on this one. Clips in 7.

Dallas (4) vs. Memphis (5): The NBA's screwed up seeding system means that Memphis gets booted out quickly for the 3rd straight year. Dallas in 5.

Detroit (1) vs. Milwaukee (8): Detroit will dispose of the Bucks with ease. Pistons in 4.

Miami (2) vs. Bulls (7): Miami will finish the Bulls easily. Heat in 4.

New Jersey (3) vs. Indiana (6): Indiana's dangerous but I don't think they have it together this year. Nets in 5.

Cleveland (4) vs. Washington (5): Washington is weak, but the Cavs are inexperienced. Cavs in 5.

2nd round -- some great series this round.

San Antonio (1) vs. Dallas (4): I'm rooting for Dallas to win this, but they can't get past Duncan. Spurs in 7.

Suns (2) vs. Clippers (6): The Suns have it pretty easy. Suns in 5.

Detroit (1) vs. Cleveland (4): LeBron could cause some damage but Detroit isn't in too much risk. Pistons in 6.

Miami (2) vs. New Jersey (3): The Heat have a real dogfight on their hands. Hopefully the Nets will put this one out. Heat in 7.

Conference Finals -- a bit of an anticlimax after the previous round.

San Antonio (1) vs. Phoenix (2): If Amare was playing this would be interesting (the Suns are better overall than last year), but San Antonio should cruise to the finals. Spurs in 5.

Detroit (1) vs. Miami (2): Much easier for Detroit this time around, though the Nets might put up more of a fight. Pistons in 6.

NBA Finals -- a rematch, but a different ending this time.

Detroit vs. San Antonio: I think Detroit's the better team this time, barring an injury to one of their starters. Hopefully Dallas makes it this far so we can stay awake long enough to find out who wins. Pistons in 7.

Edited by Soulstation1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Round 1

West

SA in 5 over Queens

Dallas in 7 over Memphis

LA Clippers in 6 over McNuggets

Phoenix in 6 over Lakers

East

Detroit in 4 over Bucks

Washington in 7 over Cavs

NJ in 7 over Indiana

Miami in 6 over Chicago

Round 2

West

SA in 6 over Dallas

Phoenix in 6 over Clippers

East

Detroit in 4 over Washington

NJ in 7 over Miami

Conference Finals

West

SA in 5 over Phoenix

East

Detroit in 5 over NJ

Finals

Detroit in 7 over SA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Round 1

West

SA in 5 over Queens

Dallas in 5 over Memphis

Nuggets in 7 over Clippers

Phoenix in 6 over Lakers

East

Detroit in 4 over Bucks

Cavs in 6 over The Wiz

NJ in 6 over Indiana

Miami in 5 over Chicago

Round 2

West

SA in 6 over Dallas

Phoenix in 6 over Nugz

East

Detroit in 5 over Cavs

Miami in 6 over NJ

Conference Finals

West

SA in 5 over Phoenix

East

Detroit in 6 over Miami

Finals

Detroit in 6 over SA

Im interested to see what Kobe and Bron do in round one, otherwise it wont be too interesting. Only 4 teams have any shot whatsoever at the championship, :bwallace: , spurs, miami, dallas, in that order.

Edited by md655321
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's how I think we should score this thing:

1st round: 5 pts for every series that's called correctly. Then up to 3 additional pts for how close you are with the number of games -- i.e., bulls-eye 3 pts, within one game 2 pts, within two games 1 pt. So if you predict Lakers-Suns in 7 and the series goes to 7 but the Suns win in 7, you get 2 pts. If the Suns win in 6 you get 1 pt. On the other hand if the Lakers win in 7 you get 8 pts, if they win in 6 you get 7 pts, if they sweep you get 5 pts.

Then we double the pts for each additional round.

Guy

Edited by Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

guy

how about we do 5,3,1 pts for the # of games

so you can max out @ 10 pts per series in the 1st round (total of 160 points available with 16 series played)

in second round

10 points per series winner PLUS 5,3,1 pts for number of games

and we add 5 ponits per series per round and the same 5,3,1

if you enter pool

that person is responsible for adding their own numbers and posting total

also let's pick a sleeper pick (seed #5-8) from each conf and for each round they win you get (5,10, 15.......points

Edited by Soulstation1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

my picks

West

1st round

SA in 6, Artest can handle Duncan

Dallas in 5

Denver in 6

Phoenix in 6

East

1st round

Det in 4

Lebrons in 6, could be best 1st round series

NJ in 5

Miami in 5

_______________________________

2 round

West

SA in 6 over Dallas

Phoenix in 7 over Denver

East

Detroit in 6 over the Lebrons

NJ in 6 over Miami.....NJ will beat Miami somehow

________________________________________

3rd round

West Conf Finals

SA in 5 over Phoenix

East Conf Finals

Det in 6 over NJ

________________________________________

Finals

Detroit in 6 games over SA, in the all time lowest watched NBA finals

Edited by Soulstation1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, I'm in.

My picks are:

1st round

SA in 5

PHX in 6

Clippers in 7

Dallas in 7

DET in 5

MIA in 6

NJ in 6

CLV in 7

2nd round

SA in 7

Clippers in 7

DET in 6

MIA in 6

Western Conf title: San Antonio in 5

Eastern Conf title: Detroit in 6

NBA title: DETROIT in 6

You will see Eva Longoria in every game San Antonio plays. So by my count that would 24 games.

BruceW

:bwallace:

:bwallace2:

Because I made a mistake in counting games for Eva Longoria, s/b 24 game instead of 19. This edit done before playoffs started. BruceW

Edited by BruceW
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn, I'd like to play but I don't know crap about NBA beyond the Pistons and Cavs! :P

Why don't you guys just pick the first round first, then hold off till the next round starts before predicting the games? I'd be in game-shape by the time Conference finals rolled around! :D:bwallace:

Actually, I agree with you BUT nobody does it that way; not the other bulletin boards, not the

"enemies" I have in my email clan, not the pools I get in, not the NCAA or NIT pools. I don't know why, nobody is interested in making it really interesting by waiting for the survivors of each round. So the picking becomes a crap shoot...... so the choices become whom you "like" - not who is the best of the survivors.

:g

Bruce

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are my picks:

Western Conference:

Spurs over Kings in 6 games

Dallas over Memphis in 5 Games

Denver over the Clippers in 7 games

Phoenix over the Lakers in 6 games

Dallas over Spurs in 6 games

Phoenix over Denver in 5 games

Dallas over Phoenix in 6 games

Eastern Conference

Detroit over Milwaukee in 4 games

Washington over Cleveland in 6 games

New Jersey over Indiana in 6 games

Miami over Chicago in 5 games

Detroit over Washington in 5 games

Miami over New Jersey in 7 games

Detroit over Miami in 4 games

Finals Detroit over Dallas in 5 games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn, I'd like to play but I don't know crap about NBA beyond the Pistons and Cavs! :P

Why don't you guys just pick the first round first, then hold off till the next round starts before predicting the games? I'd be in game-shape by the time Conference finals rolled around! :D:bwallace:

Actually, I agree with you BUT nobody does it that way; not the other bulletin boards, not the

"enemies" I have in my email clan, not the pools I get in, not the NCAA or NIT pools. I don't know why, nobody is interested in making it really interesting by waiting for the survivors of each round. So the picking becomes a crap shoot...... so the choices become whom you "like" - not who is the best of the survivors.

:g

Actually what would be most logical, but also tedious, would be to make predictions for every single possible series. I'm too lazy to calculate how many predictions that would be.

Guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wilt made 35 straight FGs no misses

http://www.basketball.com/nba/records/NBAsnglLdrsFG.shtml

i think kobe hit 50 points 6 times this season

http://www.nba.com/playerfile/kobe_bryant/...game_stats.html # 08 game by game scoring numbers

wilt scored 50 or more points 45 times in the 1961-62 season, including seven consecutively (Dec. 16-29, 1961)

Edited by Soulstation1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not a fair comparison, $$1. Kobe doesn't even play the same position as Wilt, and Wilt was literally a giant compared to all the other players outside Bill Russell's shoes.

Magic Johnson had a career total 138 triple doubles.

During the 1961-1962 season, Oscar Robertson averaged a triple double with 30.8 points, 12.5 rebounds, and 11.4 assists per game.

I'll still take Magic over the Big O as the all time greatest point guard.

Magicj.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...