Should political avatars be banned?

[Niko]

also ich wär dabei, aber ich bin auch ziemlich undemokratisch eingestellt... entdecke grad element of crime wieder, nicht unglaublich gut, aber viel besser als ich in erinnerung hatte (delmenhorst)

[J.A.W.]

Heißes Thema.

Und ein ziemlich heikles Thema

[Dan Gould]

So, if you see it as useless verbiage, and pay no attention, why do you have them turned on?

Because I read them once and then have no trouble not noticing them afterward.

[AllenLowe]

first amendment

[J.A.W.]

first amendment

The Constitution of the United States and its amendments don't apply here, it's Jim who sets the rules.

Edited October 5, 2009 by J.A.W.

[7/4]

first amendment

The Constitution of the United States and its amendments don't apply here, it's Jim who sets the rules.

dat's right!

[Ken Dryden]

One person's bad taste is another's satire. Whatever Jim wants is fine, he's paying for the board, so his rules rule.

[AllenLowe]

"Whatever Jim wants is fine, he's paying for the board, so his rules rule"

exactly - but I wish he would relax that "wear a thong while posting" rule. I've got the wedgie of my life -

Edited October 5, 2009 by AllenLowe

[RDK]

While I doubt mine was the problem, I've removed it anyway. It was old news by now and I'd been thinking of changing it but was too lazy.

[Jazzmoose]

"Whatever Jim wants is fine, he's paying for the board, so his rules rule"

exactly - but I wish he would relax that "wear a thong while posting" rule. I've got the wedgie of my life -

Shit. I thought he meant the footwear...

[7/4]

What I've never understood is the appeal of reading a person's signature over and over and over. Unless people changed them frequently, it seems like getting beat over the head to me. You can see what someone has chosen for their signature by visiting their public profile, so I don't want to view the same message multiple times every day.

The more I think about it, the more I agree with this, so I turned off the signatures.

But now you can't see how I changed my little photos!

[Aggie87]

I'm still working out 7:11:13:17:23:29:31. I don't have time for photos

[Free For All]

I'm still working out 7:11:13:17:23:29:31. I don't have time for photos

[Niko]

http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequence...anguage=english

[Aggie87]

Aha! I knew it was a sublist of a(n) = p(n)- primorial(k), where p(n) is n-th prime number, k is greatest number for which primorial(k)<=p(n).

I just knew it!

...was afraid to say it here in case you all would ridicule me though.

[7/4]

They're prime numbers.

:rsmile:

[Bright Moments]

so it looks like we are pretty well evenly split on this issue!

note to aggie - too bad u cant see my signature!