Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

just picked this up, have not even listened, but I have to say that the notes by Frank Driggs are just terrible - inaccurate (he complains that almost no one has written about Lonnie Johnson; where has he been?) incoherent and grammatically a mess; badly organized, little continuity, and nothing about the original sources of the music - I hope the actual recording is better (I'm sure it will be); this is just disappointing because Uptown's notes are usually quite good.

oh well

Posted (edited)

just picked this up, have not even listened, but I have to say that the notes by Frank Driggs are just terrible - inaccurate (he complains that almost no one has written about Lonnie Johnson; where has he been?) incoherent and grammatically a mess; badly organized, little continuity, and nothing about the original sources of the music - I hope the actual recording is better (I'm sure it will be); this is just disappointing because Uptown's notes are usually quite good.

oh well

I agree. But what do you think of his contention that Lonnie Johnson is the source from which all other jazz guitarists spring? (He doesn't actually put it that way.) BTW I saw Lonnie Johnson performing at a restaurant in Toronto. At the time I didn't really know who he was.

Edited by medjuck
Posted (edited)

neither true nor false - Eddie Lang is a closer link to jazz; Lonnie was an incredible guitarist, but not really a jazz player - his real importance is to the modern blues, IMHO. He did perform with important jazz people, but jazz critics, since they don't know enough other forms, often oversimplify. He comes out of an old-time black string band tradition more than jazz.

Edited by AllenLowe
Posted (edited)

neither true nor false - Eddie Lang is a closer link to jazz; Lonnie was an incredible guitarist, but not really a jazz player - his real importance is to the modern blues, IMHO. He did perform with important jazz people, but jazz critics, since they don't know enough other forms, often oversimplify. He comes out of an old-time black string band tradition more than jazz.

That's really interesting. The "black string-band" tradition also produced guitarist Arnold Schultz, a somewhat overlooked giant of country music who was cited by both Ike Everly and, more importantly, Bill Monroe as an influence on their styles.

http://blindman.15.forumer.com/a/arnold-schultz_post1215.html

Allen, do you know of any research into Schultz? I don't think he ever recorded.

Edited by Brownian Motion
Posted

Lonnie was an incredible guitarist, but not really a jazz player - his real importance is to the modern blues, IMHO. He did perform with important jazz people, but jazz critics, since they don't know enough other forms, often oversimplify. He comes out of an old-time black string band tradition more than jazz.

Were the "lines of demarcation" drawn as clearly then by players as they are now by historians?

Posted

re: Schultz - his name is mentioned a lot, I think by Bob Wills, but by others as well. We have third-party testimony but no recordings, so it's hard to gauge, though I think we can assume he was very important. Another interesting guy is Mose Rager, a white guitarist in the whole lineage of Blind Blake/Merle Travis/Ike Everly line and also a major influence; Larry Cohn has unreleased recordings of his, though I think something is on youtube - it's very hard in this whole thing to say who influenced whom, but that whole guitar/banjo picking tradition is extensive and complicated. We usually assume that black musicians were the source, but given the isolation of some of those areas, there were probably a lot of regional players who had their own thing, black and white.

Posted

just listening - the Minneapolis recordings are an improvement over the Columbia issues, though a little un-naturally quiet; still, ok -

HOWEVER - on the Goodman cuts, whoever did the sound work has de-hissed to the point of that disgusting gurgling/underwater sound in places - so some of these cuts are virtually unlistenable. I'm sorry I bought this thing. Sunnenblick, who has used great engineers in the past, has found someone here who has gone overboard on the de-hiss.

Posted

just listening - the Minneapolis recordings are an improvement over the Columbia issues, though a little un-naturally quiet; still, ok -

HOWEVER - on the Goodman cuts, whoever did the sound work has de-hissed to the point of that disgusting gurgling/underwater sound in places - so some of these cuts are virtually unlistenable. I'm sorry I bought this thing. Sunnenblick, who has used great engineers in the past, has found someone here who has gone overboard on the de-hiss.

Thanks for the warning. The transfers and mastering were done by Bill Welham; never heard of him.

Posted (edited)

woke up this morning to this charming little email from Uptown:

"Hey asshole, send the CD back and I'll refund your money. The total know-it-all asshole strikes again with his chat room chuckies. There is no gurgling in the Goodman tracks. And Bill Welham is quite a good engineer and doesn't deserve your jaded and "knowledgabvle" comments!! And my name is not Sunnenblick, Lownstein. Bob Sunenblick"

and in a follow-up email, strangely enough, Sunenblick, in case anyone is wondering, gave me permission to post that email.

I don't care what he calls me, but I hope you guys realize you've been called "chuckies." Must be some kind of Canadian insult.

Edited by AllenLowe
Posted (edited)

I haven't bought this disc yet, so I cannot give my impressions.

But after reading Bob Sunenblick's infuriated and probably overreactive email, we should get things into perspective. So far I just have read three different opinions regarding its sound quality on this board (in this thread and in the other one focused on Uptown Records):

* Allen's

the Minneapolis recordings are an improvement over the Columbia issues, though a little un-naturally quiet; still, ok. HOWEVER - on the Goodman cuts, whoever did the sound work has de-hissed to the point of that disgusting gurgling/underwater sound in places - so some of these cuts are virtually unlistenable. I'm sorry I bought this thing. Sunnenblick, who has used great engineers in the past, has found someone here who has gone overboard on the de-hiss

* jazzbo's

I was a bit disappointed in the sound, but it's pretty good none-the-less

* Fer Urbina's

the sound on the Charlie Christian CD is remarkable

More input?

Edited by EKE BBB
Posted

I haven't bought this disc yet, so I cannot give my impressions.

But after reading Bob Sunenblick's infuriated and probably overreactive email, we should get things into perspective. So far I just have read three different opinions regarding its sound quality on this board (in this thread and in the other one focused on Uptown Records):

* Allen's

the Minneapolis recordings are an improvement over the Columbia issues, though a little un-naturally quiet; still, ok. HOWEVER - on the Goodman cuts, whoever did the sound work has de-hissed to the point of that disgusting gurgling/underwater sound in places - so some of these cuts are virtually unlistenable. I'm sorry I bought this thing. Sunnenblick, who has used great engineers in the past, has found someone here who has gone overboard on the de-hiss

* jazzbo's

I was a bit disappointed in the sound, but it's pretty good none-the-less

* Fer Urbina's

the sound on the Charlie Christian CD is remarkable

More input?

Actually, I found Mr Sunenblick's e-mail quite funny, but it is indeed an overreaction and rather offensive.

As for the sound quality, I haven't heard the CD, but, given Allen's experience with de-noising, I trust his judgement.

Posted

please note that I never said people should not buy the CD -

as a matter of fact, over in "offerings" I have, in the interests of the public good, put my own copy up for sale.

Posted

Does Mr. Sunenblick not realize that we "chuckies" make up the large majority of his target audience? It seems to me that when one decides to get into the entertainment industry, in any capacity, that one opens oneself up to tons of criticism, justified or not. I'm sure that if one of us were to tell Chuck that his product sucked, he'd laugh and move on. Same goes for others who are members of this board like Messrs. Weiss and Kimbrough.

Posted

well, the funny thing about Sunenblick turning an attack on me into an attack on Organissimo in general is that he doesn't realize that half the members here think I'm psychotic, and the other half block my posts - :crazy:

Posted

I am tempted to change my forum name to Chat Room Chuckie.

woke up this morning to this charming little email from Uptown:

"Hey asshole, send the CD back and I'll refund your money. The total know-it-all asshole strikes again with his chat room chuckies. There is no gurgling in the Goodman tracks. And Bill Welham is quite a good engineer and doesn't deserve your jaded and "knowledgabvle" comments!! And my name is not Sunnenblick, Lownstein. Bob Sunenblick"

and in a follow-up email, strangely enough, Sunenblick, in case anyone is wondering, gave me permission to post that email.

I don't care what he calls me, but I hope you guys realize you've been called "chuckies." Must be some kind of Canadian insult.

What's with the "Lownstein"? Is that meant to be an offensive ethnic slur?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...