Rabshakeh Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago Hard to see why they released this now. These kinds of lists were once essential. I spent hours over that Thurston Moore list back in the day, awkward jive slang aside. But that was a long time ago, and with the likes of RYM and Discogs that information is now available to anyone who is interested. Quote
clifford_thornton Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago Discogs and RYM won't be around forever! Also, the verbiage is entertaining. Quote
T.D. Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago I like the list from a (latecomer and relative newbie in the field) listener's perspective. Being somewhat of an old fart, I find the writing somewhat cringe-inducing. IMO pretentious to a degree and a certain amount of collector's "flexing" as I think someone put it above. Granted that's just my taste, and the enthusiasm is definitely a plus. Quote
JSngry Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago So...the list stops in 1980. Does that mean that somebody who uses this book to drive their primary "discovering" is going to be only a quarter-century behind the times? Quote
T.D. Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago True. But more like almost half a century at present. An older/superannuated list seems much "safer". From both writing and "discovering" points of view. 😁 Quote
felser Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Well, that was a (to me, THE, ymmv) golden era for that music. Someone else can write the sequels for 1980-2000 and 2000-2020 if they want. Quote
Chuck Nessa Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 10 minutes ago, JSngry said: Would you read them if they did? I would. Quote
T.D. Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Chuck Nessa said: I would. +1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.