I actually think there is much more to this than just poor public education - in the last few years I've been listening more and more to alternative rock and roll and so-called new folk, as well as a lot of contemporary new music in general - I, myself, am working on several music projects in which I am writing songs with actual lyrics in them. One thing that has struck me, in everone from Jeff Tweedy to your average folkie, is how badly they all use language. Their sense of poetics is poor and warped, with awkward rhymes and poorly set up thematic transitions, bad hooks and cloddish symbolism. To me this has only a little to do with public education, as it sucked when I ws young also - one learns most of these things (and I mean not only language but about intellectual history and world events), IMHO, not from school but from independent examination and the reading of books and documents from newspapers to magazines. THIS is what has really declined - I have often told my wife that we suffer from a post-literate generation. Much as I love television, it has contributed geatly to this, as has the proliferation of independent recording. This ties, as well, into my recent complaints about the very empty formalism of a lot of new music - 1)it is based on a fetishization of process, as opposed to a synthesis of process and substance and 2) it reflects the work of musicians who know little history or literature, but mostly other contemporary musicians. It is similar to the poor state of independent film, highly touted as that form is. Most of these filmmakers know Tarantino and little else; they need to see Antonioni and Renoir, they need to read Proust and Beckett, but their works exists in a "contemporary" vacuume.