Jump to content

Rooster_Ties

Members
  • Posts

    13,636
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rooster_Ties

  1. SOURCE [Also, from the date on Hill's website (where I got this link from), this interview appears to be from May 2000. -- Rooster]
  2. Clearly Hill was in a different place creatively in 1967-70, than he was in 63-66. But I say "different", because I don't necessarily think the later material is particularly 'worse' or 'sub-standard', as compared to the earlier material. Just different, and (yes) somewhat more accessable. Sure, the earlier stuff is probably more important, and more likely to 'stand the test of time' - as it were. But I love most of that later Hill BN material too - for what it is... a solid attempt to present Hill's concepts in a more accessable context - but without being a total sellout in the process. Sure the recordings don't quite gel as much as one would hope, though I'd argue that "Passing Ships" and "Lift Every Voice" nearly do - in their own ways. And "Life Every Voice" in particuar (plus the extra previously unreleased session with vocals) has some really deep shit on it, that didn't start to sink in with me until several dozen listens. It's not 'firey', but more like a smoldering fire, after it's been going all night, but still is putting out a ton of heat. I just think the 67-70 material has to be assessed on it's own terms, almost as if the earlier (more 'out') Hill never happened before. In fact, I think generally the more progressive types (like many of us here) would embrace the 67-70 Hill recordings more strongly, if it weren't for his earlier groundbreaking work. Let me put it to you this way... I kind of think of Hill's 67-70 output (vs. his 63-66 output) as being much like my views on Larry Young and John Patton in the late 60's... I love Larry Young's last four BN albums (everything after "Unity") - especially the really 'out' ones. And I also love John Patton's later BN work from the same time period. Now Young's output is more 'out' and probably stronger (to my way of thinking). But Patton's later BN output (while not quite as groundbreaking), is still some mighty deep shit too - in it's own way. So too is it with Hill's 67-70 output. It's not as strong as his earlier music, but some of it (and I'd argue, most of it) is still pretty damn deep - you dig??
  3. SOURCE
  4. Shit, I had half-forgotten about that story Eric. You still needin' burns of any of the Hill box?? Say the word, and I'll get right on it. I can make you a copy of the booklet too.
  5. I don't want to make too much of this, but I've always been impressed by Hill having studied briefly with Hindemith - a German classical composer who I've really grown to like over the years. I'm not sure I hear any similarities in their music (none, really), but I've always found it interesting that Hindemith saw something in Hill's early compositions, and encouraged him in various music ways. Hey, anybody know about Hill having a Doctorate degree?? - presumably in music composition??? I know he taught for sometime at a college or university in Portland, OR. Where and when did he get the Doctorate?? Wouldn’t that imply that he had to have written a doctoral thesis????? Wouldn’t that maybe be an interesting read??? He was also a church musician for sometime in the 70's (presumably leading a choir, and playing on Sunday mornings -- the whole bit). And (I think I remember reading this somewhere), didn't he do concerts in prisons in the 70's??? Man, oh, man -- somebody needs to write a book about this man. (My wife thinks I ought to write it - and occasionally I'm half tempted to take a stab at it.)
  6. Repeat after me. He's from Chicago. He's from Chicago. He's from Chicago. I know, you've read a dozen times about him being born in Haiti (and you can do a Google search on "Andrew Hill Haiti" and get about 100 hits). But seriously, he was born in Chicago. He just made up the "Haiti" part, and for a time even spelled his name "Hille" (on Jimmy Wood's "Conflict" - for instance), to make his name and background seem more exotic. Supposedly it was of some (perhaps only tiny) help to him in getting gigs, really early on - in the 50's mostly, I suspect. I think I have at least half-a-dozen Hill CD's that cite his having been born in Haiti -- but it ain't true. I think this is covered in the Mosaic booklet -- I'll have to dig it out later, and type up the "Haiti/Chicago" part.
  7. I took a look at all three videos just now (I was half-asleep when I started this thread late last night), and you do have to marvel at the degree to which they've gone to mimic the style of "hair-bands" of the late 70's. The sound is there, and the look is there too. Really damn creepy, on some levels - and maybe remarkable on other some other level. Maybe I can begin to understand why this is taking off in England -- cuz I can imagine people being amazed at the degree to which it's just like turning back the clock ( That, and probably some serious media saturation and heavy rotation on the right radio stations. )
  8. Again, same error... Warning: Too many connections in /home2/organ/public_html/organissimo.org/forum/sources/Drivers/mySQL.php on line 65 Warning: MySQL Connection Failed: Too many connections in /home2/organ/public_html/organissimo.org/forum/sources/Drivers/mySQL.php on line 65 Warning: Supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /home2/organ/public_html/organissimo.org/forum/sources/Drivers/mySQL.php on line 68 ERROR: Cannot find database organforum Warning: Supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /home2/organ/public_html/organissimo.org/forum/sources/Drivers/mySQL.php on line 101 There appears to be an error with the Organissimo Forums - The place to discuss the band, jazz, music, and more! database. You can try to refresh the page by clicking here, if this does not fix the error, you can contact the board administrator by clicking here Error Returned mySQL query error: SELECT id, member_id, running_time, location FROM forumsessions WHERE id='38c7551134c661f0614e4e2d443f51da' and ip_address='65.28.33.106' mySQL error: Too many connections mySQL error code: Date: Thursday 16th of October 2003 04:44:40 PM We apologise for any inconvenience
  9. Damn it, Jim; we don't care about your squirrel...stay on topic for crying out loud!
  10. FYI, just got another one of these... Warning: Too many connections in /home2/organ/public_html/organissimo.org/forum/sources/Drivers/mySQL.php on line 65 Warning: MySQL Connection Failed: Too many connections in /home2/organ/public_html/organissimo.org/forum/sources/Drivers/mySQL.php on line 65 Warning: Supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /home2/organ/public_html/organissimo.org/forum/sources/Drivers/mySQL.php on line 68 ERROR: Cannot find database organforum Warning: Supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /home2/organ/public_html/organissimo.org/forum/sources/Drivers/mySQL.php on line 101 There appears to be an error with the Organissimo Forums - The place to discuss the band, jazz, music, and more! database. You can try to refresh the page by clicking here, if this does not fix the error, you can contact the board administrator by clicking here Error Returned mySQL query error: SELECT id, member_id, running_time, location FROM forumsessions WHERE id='3332669c367fc68f2e45131952b0c02b' and ip_address='65.28.33.106' mySQL error: Too many connections mySQL error code: Date: Thursday 16th of October 2003 03:06:05 PM We apologise for any inconvenience
  11. Studio plans 'Fan Interference' movie --- Report: Movie already planned based on Cubs fan blamed for keeping his team out of World Series.
  12. Bev, you were just the first U.K. person around here that I thought of. And "cricket", what's that?? Please explain. The funny thing about all this (according to the AMG bio), is that this band all strarted with the lead singer belting out a fantastic verison of Queen's "Bohemian Rhapsody" in some karaoke bar on New Year's Eve in 1999.
  13. Oh man, I totally believe that - 150%!!!!
  14. Great, thanks to jpmosu and jazzbo... Now I simultaniously have absolutely NO interest in seeing "Kill Bill"... ...and I also can't wait to see it, perferably as soon as this weekend!!!
  15. Thanks Bev!!! I'm quoting your mention of this concert being on the BBC website, in case anyone skimmed your above post, and maybe missed it. Sounds very interesting. I look forward to listening to it.
  16. I have most of Hill's solo piano releases (expect "From California with Love" and "Les Trinitaires"), plus there's an hour of solo-piano on Hill's own web-site (HERE, go to the "mp3's" section, and it's right below the samples from "A Beautiful Day"). I love nearly all of Hill's solo-piano work, though I've had a tougher time getting into "Faces of Hope" (and I don't feel like I've really embraced it quite yet). "Hommage" is great and surprisingly mellow (and deceptively simple, while being more complex than it lets on, I think). I put this on when my wife are drifting off to sleep sometimes (seriously!!) - so if that doesn't tell you how 'mellow' it is, nothing will. "Live at Montreux" for some reason reminds me a little bit of Ellington's solo-piano recordings (or maybe Ellington reminds me of Hill ). And it's not just the one Ellington tune he covers on this disc - but rather the entire disc. And... "Verona Rag" has some great stride-work on it (as I receall), and a couple very strong tunes as well. Also, Hill has some extended solo-piano passages (or entire cuts) on a few of his other albums. If I remember right, the title track to "Divine Revelation" has a nearly 10-minute solo-piano intro (the tune is 25 minutes long), that is simply stunning.
  17. To my surprise, the AMG has a review of damn near my favorite 'unofficial' Matthew Sweet release. Mine probably isn't an original, but who cares - the music is fantastic. 5-stars in my book.
  18. Speaking more generally about Sweet - I've loved nearly every disc he's released since "Girlfriend" in 1991, and his earlier material is even interesting too. I first discovered him with "100% Fun" in 1995 (that I got a free promo of at some radio station live remote), but I quickly bought up his entire catalog. (Somehow I missed "Girlfriend" when it first came out.) The only Sweet album I haven't been quite as fond of is "Blue Sky on Mars" - which wasn't nearly up to his usual standards. But with "In Reverse" from 1999, he was back on track. About 1996-97, I saw Sweet and his band perform 3 times within like 18 months, either here in Kansas City, or in Lawrence, Kansas (about an hour west from here). Great shows!! I'd go see him again, anytime.
  19. My god, it's worse than even I had feared!! We need to develop a "neo-hair-band" emergency alert system for the U.S. - PRONTO!!! "We have to take the possible threat of neo-'hair-bands' very seriously. Somebody get me Tom Ridge on the phone, now!"
  20. I only heard "Shades" for the very first time a few months ago. But I would really have to give it pretty high marks as far as being a Hill recording from the 80's or 90's that's both 'fairly approachable' -- and also 'quite beautiful'. Actually, I wish I hadn't overlooked it for so long, because it would have been a good album for me to cut my teeth on, as far as starting to get into Hill's music and concepts.
  21. Anybody ever heard this??? (or even heard of this??) Matthew Sweet: Kimi Ga Suki * Raifu (2003, Cutting Edge 16050) AMG review: Yes, we can turn this into a general discussion thread about Matthew Sweet, if we like. (Later on, I'll probably change the thread-title to reflect this.) Also, I see there's one on Ebay right now (HERE), which indicates that it is a 'copy-controled' CD. Just how badly do these things suck?? I've never bought one, and don't relish the thought of shelling out $30 for an import that's gonna go south on me in 2-3 years, or that's not gonna play on any stereo I own in 5-10 years. ( bordering on )
  22. Well, to me they sure look and sound just as 'serious' as the real thing (back in the day). I'm not saying this is a good thing, or a bad thing -- but like it or not, it is a thing to be reckoned with. Now whether it leads to a full-scale revival of an entire forgotten genre has yet to be seen. But in the event that such a thing would happen - I started this thread to give all of us enough time to take the proper and necessary precautions. In fact, if we each do our part now – before this thing takes off and becomes a force run rampant, and totally out of control – perhaps the impact can be contained, with only a reasonable number of 'acceptable losses' – and we can maybe even minimize the 'collateral damage' as well, who knows? Remember, the future of an entire half-decade of popular music is probably riding on this!! I shudder to think of what future generations will possibly say when they look back on what could be known as possibly among the darkest days of popular music ... when neo-'hair-bands' roamed the airwaves, unchecked and unfettered, for the better part of the last half of the first decade of a new century. And then, if such a thing does actually happen ... it's entirely possible that a development such as this might inevitably lead to music-genre hybrids never before envisioned, not even in our wildest nightmares!! Yes, I'm talking about the very real possibility of a full-scale synthesis of late 70’s/early 80’s "Hair-Band" Hard Rock/Pseudo-Metal... ...and Rap!!! (And you thought Limp Bizkit pissed off an entire generation of parents?? You just wait!!!! )
  23. My wife had to fly to Chicago for a work-related trip today (Wednesday), and she'll be back tomorrow (Thursday) -- so I asked her to grab both today's and tomorrow's copies of the Chicago Tribune (one of the best daily papers in the country, I might add -- and that's coming from someone who's never lived in Chicago). Should be interesting to read the local perspective on the interference from the fan, and the loss tonight. A very good friend of mine here in Kansas City is a huge Cubs fan – so much so that she was seriously thinking about dropping $2,000 on tickets to the World Series, if the Cubs had gotten in. So close, and yet – so far...
  24. Well, heck - Kansas City is like on the way back home from Texas, so stop by here too!!! Have a great trip!!!!!!!
  25. More importantly -- how'd they do that??????? Pretty nifty trick, if you ask me!!!
×
×
  • Create New...