Rooster_Ties

Bump!

And what about his comic books? (Not entirely kidding either.)

I think lots of people are trusting it more and more (too much), and they seem to be forgetting the limitations. I don’t trust it. Nothing like legal filings that are citing non-existent case law — if a lazy lawyer uses it. In very controlled cases, it most definitely has its uses, particularly I looking for pattern matching in complex medical results — as long as the results are closely reviewed by a trained/qualified human. But just expecting AI to get “most things” roughly “good enough” generally “much of the time” — and then pretending that’s adequate for many applications — is just a recipe for disaster. ====== I also find it funny that I’ve read that ChatGPT is notorious for using lots of em dashes — like I did in the paragraph right above, and again here now — and how that’s an absolute ‘tell’ for AI-generated results. I use em-dashes TONS in my more colloquial on-line conversations, here and elsewhere. And I use them more than I should in email too. So suddenly I’m open to charges of using AI when I post stuff!!

Haven’t had enough interest or curiosity to try any of them personally. And I try to avoid relying on AI-generated search results from Google — although I will definitely skim them, and then click on the source links it provides to verify from the non-AI source. (And I must confess to being tempted to trust them more and more sometimes.) That said, I have and do browse a several different AI-related subreddits with periodic regularity — about CharGPT, and AI-generated images, and such (even video). So count me as both wanting to avoid direct interaction with AI — while still being a little fascinated with online discussions about AI.

Yeah, didn’t think it’d float your boat — but was still curious what you’d think. Thx!

Do me a favor: Give this track a listen, Dan. The Steve Coleman comparison is subtle, and I might be the person who even hears it that way. It’s not the tune or context that reminds me of Coleman — just something about the way Rouse uses time that does. Humor me, Dan — how does this hit you? Let it go long enough to get into Charlie’s solo a good bit. It’s not ‘out’ at all, just modern, to my ears…

I love Rouse’s Strata-East album. It’s different, and a little weird — and I appreciate that none of it is tepid. I’ve even occasionally thought some of Rouse’s playing (specifically on his Strata East) reminds me a little bit of Steve Coleman — if you can believe it.

I probably wouldn’t say no to a free copy of the expanded version — but this is nothing I really ‘need’. I do really like Charlie’s fast-tempo solos (like track 3) — more specifically, Charlie seems full of good ideas there. But the overall context is a little limp for me. Some of the album might grow on me a bit — but I kinda don’t want to listen to it often enough to hafta get to that point.

Barcelona!

I vaguely remember hearing this too — years after this thread — and also decided it sounded more like Garnett too. Or at least it definitely didn’t sound like Tyrone.

Hard to be content with no content.

No joke (no joke).

That’s my problem too. The price-point is just too high for me to justify. I’ve never owned any of the individual albums from the set — and, ironically, it’s the disc with the valve-trombonist that I’d maybe find to be the most curious (both for being valve trombone, and also for it being a pianoless/chordless quartet configuration. If it were half the price — and half the material (say 4 discs) — I probably would have bought one by now.

The alternate of “Mode for Joe” (the title track) IS — as far as I remember — on the Mosaic too. I’m talking about the track that was previously only ever on the semi-recent Japanese SHM CD reissue (which I do have). I don’t have the Henderson Mosaic (nor the Hutcherson or Hubbard), but I did buy a copy of the booklet for the Henderson Mosaic. I will say that that alternate of “Mode for Joe” is a real stunner, far as I’m concerned. I too am really curious about the previously unissued “Photon” from the Hutcherson set — but less so the other alternates. When push came to shove, I couldn’t justify rebuying all that Hutcherson just for that track (and the alternates) — although 10-15 years prior I probably would have bought it. I can play you that alternate of “Mode for Joe” sometime, Bertrand — it really was an eye-opener for me.

Didn’t that used to be CD’s you bought from Starbucks??

Yeah. Such dithering. Pick a side!

Oh, definitely, or eBay. No longer even considering this Amazon offer, once the $22 shipping fee appeared out of nowhere.

I’ve almost bought that solo-piano Herbie date a dozen times or more. Maybe one of these days I’ll finally bite.

Since I first posted, the listing on Amazon changed from being fulfilled by Amazon (and eligible for free shipping if you spend $35). Now it’s fulfilled by a third party, and costs an additional $22 for shipping. If I do buy this MJQ 40 box at some point, it won’t be thru this offer on Amazon. (But there do appear to be other not-so-expensive offers to be had elsewhere.) But I’m still pretty disappointed it doesn’t include their remake of Ornette’s “Lonely Woman”.

Ok, now that is weird — because yesterday and the day before it was free shipping if you met Amazon’s total purchase minimum (maybe $35 now, I forget). And I’d added almost enough in my cart to get to $35 — and there was no extra shipping on the MJQ 40 box. Bullet dodged then, I suppose.

I just noticed this MJQ box on Amazon, so cheap it might as well be free (less than $7, if you can imagine). Combined with other stuff, no shipping (we’re not on Prime, never will be). And it IS fulfilled by Amazon directly (it’s NOT from some dealer on the marketplace). Here it is… https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000002ISE I know, no brainer probably. But reading the Amazon reviews, oddly some of the reviews read like it’s for one specific album (cd) — so maybe this really isn’t the MJQ 40 box after all?? FWIW, I’ve only had 2 different MJQ LP’s over the years (somewhat beat up LP’s) — one was Pyramid (with “Django”) — and I forget the other one, which I must have traded 25 yrs ago. And no CD’s, ever. Big oversight on my part, I know. So I’m looking online to try and get a sense of the proportion of years covered in this box — and I can’t seem to find anything discographical other than song titles, and and overall set of years covered. And I found an image on eBay that said disc 4 covers 1973-1988 (so if the whole thing is chronological, then that means it’s not at all bloated towards their later years). What do people think about how this set was curated? But I’ll admit I’m really peeved to discover one tune, Ornette’s “Lonely Woman” apparently ISN’T included — which is one of a handful MJQ tracks I’ve always really loved. But other than that omission, is it a fairly good overview? Here’s the Discogs entry for it: https://www.discogs.com/release/7534618-The-Modern-Jazz-Quartet-MJQ-40

Herbie is phenomenal on that unreleased Tyrone session. I’ve often imagined what a Herbie piano-trio album from about 1965-1968 or so might have sounded like… but specifically with the kind of playing Herbie displays on the Tyrone Session (also on Wayne’s All Seeing Eye). More percussive, less harmony-driven, and less about ‘tunes’ and changes.

Not sure if the results of your 2014 inquiry was the first time I’d heard that — but I do know I’ve heard that date was ‘lost’ for years (and years). In fact, now that I’m typing this, I’m remembering that I (crazily) pitched an idea for a Tyrone ‘Select’ — with Natural Essence, the so-called ‘Trainwreck’, the unreleased Jackie McLean session(s) w/ Tyrone, and I forget what else I suggested including (maybe what Tyrone recorded with Larry Young — what all would fit on 3cd’s would have been dependent on how long the McLean material was). And I also think(?) Michael told me the McLean date was lost too. This was via an email exchange, and before I moved to DC (so it would have been in 2010 or before — maybe between 2005-2010). But I think(?) even that wasn’t the first time I’d heard it was lost.

True, but I was sort of pleasantly surprised by Just Coolin’ actually — but maybe my expectations were low going into it (which they were). No, not revelatory at all, but in some ways l like it better than the live version of that band (or at least the one live recording we have of that band).

Goodness gracious, a lot of those are quite nice!!! Looking forward to perusing their wares. Thx!!