I'm arguing that your guess that I'd be pissed off is incorrect.
←
Well, see, you appear to be arguing something much broader than that. You said:
Now, I'm fascinated by this leap between what you perceive to be a business's lack of "responsibility" (i.e., obligation) in a certain situation, and what they "should" alternatively do. That is, you suggest they have no obligation to look out for any particular customer's interests, and therefore they are obligated to sell to just anyone. I just don't see why that should be the case.
And so I asked , is your contention about what Mosaic "should" do an argument about sound business ethics (Mosaic's sense of conscience), or about sound business practice (Mosaic's bottom line)?
The context was provided in the part of my posts that you neglected to quote.