I could not disagree more. Bad calls are a part of the game. It happens in games that should be "Perfect" and it happens in a game that should have ended a World Series and it happens in games that are instantly forgotten. The human aspect of umpiring is a part of the game and that cannot change. Not to mention the fact that the league is trying to keep games from going so long, and you want to expand the video review to bang-bang plays at a base?
I think that when a manager comes out of the dugout to argue a call and goes on a rampage that wastes more time then having a instant replay rule ever would. Having an expanded instant replay rule would cut down on a lot outbursts. I think you can have instant replay w/ out adding significant time to the game. Look at the NFL. 2 challenges a game and the officials have a short time frame(I think 2 minutes??)to take a look at the call. Those challenges don't add any significant time to the game. I'd rather they get the call right and have the game end 10 minutes later than for them to blow the call and have it end 10 minutes earlier. And yes bad calls are part of the game but if the technology exists that would enable those bad calls to be reduced, why not use it?
I could not disagree more. Bad calls are a part of the game.
No doubt the bad call is a pisser, but hell, if you're going to audit the bad calls then do you turn around and audit the questionable ball/strike calls in the pitcher's favor? Perfect games have become downright commonplace so the pitcher may be better off folk-hero-wise getting screwed than having it counted in the books. Sort of a Harvey Haddix, without the extra innings. Baseball games are long enough as it is, throw in replays and we're talking 5 1/2 hour Yankee-Red Sox games.
I would draw the line at balls/strikes.