Jump to content

Clifford Brown Complete Quebec Jazz Session


Recommended Posts

It's a release on RLR (88646) taken from 4 different events, among which one purports to include Rob McConnell (tb) and possibly Harold Land (ts). I sat with McConnell last week, and he laughed at it... It's Brownie, but it ain't McConnell, and he has no idea who it might be. Also says it's not Land on tenor.

McConnell says that while he met Clifford Brown, he never did play with him at any time. But he did hang out with Richie Powell when the Brown/Roach quintet played in Toronto, and learned several tunes from him, and was much impressed with Powell as knowledgeable and generous with his talent.

The relevant session from July 28, 1955 has an oral clip from Brown saying the date, and that it's being recorded in "Quebec, Canada, province of Ontario". He's a bit confused, because that's like saying "Massachusetts, USA, state of Vermont"...

McConnell and I think that it's possibly from Hull, Quebec, which is directly across a river from the Canadian capitol of Ottawa, Ontario. In the '50s Hull was the place for staid Ottawa civil servants to head for some fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

At least some of this circulates on some Bit-Torrent sites now and then or in trades between collectors. What I've heard, the sound is pretty bad. I'll bet that Andorran label snatched it off a B-T site and is now trying to make money off of it. :tdown

Edited by Dan Gould
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not necessarily. I get the impression that RLR is actually putting out things from collectors' holdings, things that are "rare live recordings" especially to those who live in a non-bit torrent world (i.e. older fans than you and I Dan). When I've compared some material to earlier sources they sound similar, and I'm not positive they've been sourced from bit-torrent but perhaps from earlier-copy-generation collectors' tapes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not necessarily. I get the impression that RLR is actually putting out things from collectors' holdings, things that are "rare live recordings" especially to those who live in a non-bit torrent world (i.e. older fans than you and I Dan). When I've compared some material to earlier sources they sound similar, and I'm not positive they've been sourced from bit-torrent but perhaps from earlier-copy-generation collectors' tapes.

Perhaps but its certainly interesting that things like the Brownie tapes come out after they appear on Dime. Same thing with the Harold Land at The Cellar recordings that we got from DEEP originally. They circulate among collectors, someone throws them up on Dime, and then all of a sudden they've got a "new" "rare live recording". :rolleyes:

I'd say its more likely they are taking from Dime and finding paying customers among those fans who live a in a non-BT world, particularly particularly when you consider their other well-recognized business practices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"J.J. Johnson/Kai Winding All Stars 1958 European Tour" was a direct lift from my upload on DIME, except the embroidered the discographical information a bit. I digitized those directly from cassettes that a friend lent me. I never intended anyone to pay anything for them. I stopped uploading after that happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, time for one of my "I'm an ignorant moron" posts. What exactly are you guys talking about?! What are "Bit-Torrent" sites, where are they, and how do they work?

It's tough being a Luddite, but hey, somebody has to do it! :blush2:

greg mo

B-T is a technology that allows peer-to-peer file transfers in a unique way - you don't just receive files (music or movies typically) with one other person but as part of a "swarm", that is you could get a half a megabyte from one peer, and another half a megabyte from another - and the B-T software you use puts it all together in the right order. When encoded as FLAC files, the music is compressed but not "lossy" and will sound exactly like it sounded originally. It even recognizes if a download is incomplete and furnishes you with the missing bits. Simultaneously, you are uploading bits and pieces from what you have received to other members of the "swarm". So there is no central server that hosts files, as the early music sharing sites did.

Dime, AKA dimeadozen, allows B-T uploads that are non-commercial and not specifically disallowed by either the artist or the venue. There are other sites that freely share copyrighted material including things like Chuck's reissues, current releases and current movies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, time for one of my "I'm an ignorant moron" posts. What exactly are you guys talking about?! What are "Bit-Torrent" sites, where are they, and how do they work?

It's tough being a Luddite, but hey, somebody has to do it! :blush2:

greg mo

B-T is a technology that allows peer-to-peer file transfers in a unique way - you don't just receive files (music or movies typically) with one other person but as part of a "swarm", that is you could get a half a megabyte from one peer, and another half a megabyte from another - and the B-T software you use puts it all together in the right order. When encoded as FLAC files, the music is compressed but not "lossy" and will sound exactly like it sounded originally. It even recognizes if a download is incomplete and furnishes you with the missing bits. Simultaneously, you are uploading bits and pieces from what you have received to other members of the "swarm". So there is no central server that hosts files, as the early music sharing sites did.

Dime, AKA dimeadozen, allows B-T uploads that are non-commercial and not specifically disallowed by either the artist or the venue. There are other sites that freely share copyrighted material including things like Chuck's reissues, current releases and current movies.

Dan, thanks for the quick reply. It is definitely a brave new world, but it sounds like a wonderful way to share high-quality, mostly non-copyrighted material. Too bad the pirates are all over it. I hope a way can be found to keep them out.

greg mo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the RLR release by George Russell was taken one-to-one from a share of mine on said BT site... they ripped it off, including the info, but they missed the corrections posted in the comments... and more importantly, they will not upgrade I guess, now that the version in circulation has better sound, additional music AND finally corrected information as well! Their loss... and yes, they do rip off from there.

There was a lot of Brownie around, most of it in very bad quality, alas... the releases by Lonehill, RLR and others are a mess (the Dolphy session, anyone?)

Has anybody figured out all the details for these Brownie live shows? Is there a discography that includes correct info for all these "in circulation" and bootlegged recordings? I'd love to see this sorted out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay guys, I'm still unconvinced, but that's okay. I know how deep the layers of the onion of jsazz trading can be, I mean there are a lot of people holding tapes and cdrs and files of these and they could have gotten the tapes of these people rather than from the sites,.

It doesn't really matter. They don't really have the right to put them on cd anymore than others have the right to put them on dime, it's all pirating. Too bad the world doesn't work differently and these can be released legitimately and artists/heirs benefit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay guys, I'm still unconvinced, but that's okay. I know how deep the layers of the onion of jsazz trading can be, I mean there are a lot of people holding tapes and cdrs and files of these and they could have gotten the tapes of these people rather than from the sites,.

It doesn't really matter. They don't really have the right to put them on cd anymore than others have the right to put them on dime, it's all pirating. Too bad the world doesn't work differently and these can be released legitimately and artists/heirs benefit.

Yes, I agree!

But between the two alternatives, I think sharing among fans is the one I'll prefer.

On the other hand, there's - alas! - no guarantee that fans will actually buy these once they'll be officially released. I try to do so whenever I actually find out about such official releases!

But alas, we don't live in an ideal world...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I'd rather have a cd release than a download, I haven't doen BTs yet and don't inted to start.

I feel sort of bad buying these from the pirates, but. . . I still buy some. :(

Yeah, for preservation reasons, that's definitely the smarter choice. Whenever I get them cheap, I buy 'em as well, but living in a country where almost everything is overprized, that's pretty seldom the case - funny enough though the one thing I most recently found for a very good prize (7-8$) was that Brownie 3CD set on Lonehill... marvellous music!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I'd rather have a cd release than a download, I haven't doen BTs yet and don't inted to start.

I feel sort of bad buying these from the pirates, but. . . I still buy some. :(

As do I, but usually only sets I can't get anywhere else. I've *never* bought one of the Mosaic ripoffs, for example. But when the only place to get the Jimmy Cleveland sessions is Lonehill, I get them there. 'Course, we've all had this conversation before, haven't we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The landscape is changing rapidly. Other than Mosaic, Nessa, and a few others, labels like Lonehill are becoming the only game in town for CD reissues of relatively obscure jazz recordings. The choice is usually either to by a pirate reissue or download. What is a jazz lover to do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...