Jump to content

I'm not too happy with "Jazz Improv" right now...


Recommended Posts

Over the summer I wrote roughly a dozen reviews for this magazine. The new issue came out recently (it seems to come out a few times a year) and of the dozen reviews I wrote, only one was printed. No big deal right? These things happen. C'est La Vie. Except that the one review that has my name on it ISN'T THE REVIEW I WROTE. I wrote a middling review of Al Basile's "Red Breath." What was printed was a GLOWING review. It's horribly written too (I'm not claiming that my review was brilliant, but it was better than the crap that replaced it). A few phrases from my review were lifted and used in the rewrite, so I know that whoever wrote it read the original. I'm pretty pissed at the moment. So I don't think I'll be writing anything for "Jazz Improv" in the future... :angry::rmad::angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might want to check with your attorney if you feel the mag is misrepresenting your work and damaging your professional reputation.

I bought one issue of Jazz Improv, and it was my last. A lot of the writing ranged from boring to embarassingly amateurish.

"The Webster Dictionary defines record review as writing about records and boy this one is a swingin one! The Duke he sure could play jazz and comppose too! So be sure to swing along to this one because it swnigs! The End.."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't the first thing I've heard about Jazz Improv soliciting reviews and then sitting on them indefinitely, with little or no response to the respective writer when they wonder WTF happened to it.

It is the first I've heard about out and out editorial sloppiness/illegality like that, though. Sad, as the mag's premise has the potential to be a great one in the industry.

Truly shameful, imho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alexander's official endorsement of Jazz Improv will appear in the next issue. Here is a preview of the exact, unaltered text:

Over the summer I wrote roughly a dozen reviews for this magazine. The new issue came out recently (it seems to come out a few times a year) and of the dozen reviews I wrote, several were printed! Good for me right? Life is wonderful. The one review that has my name on it is the one I wrote. I wrote a glowing review of Al Basile's "Red Breath" and that is what they printed. My review was brilliant, so stylistically they left it unaltered. A few phrases from my review were lifted and used as an example to others how to write great prose! I'm pretty delighted at the moment. So I think I'll be writing more for "Jazz Improv" in the future... :D:lol:;):P B) :excited::excited::wub:

by Alexander

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Wait, wait! It gets even better!

I got an extremely P.O.ed e-mail from Jazz Improv this morning, reading in part:

"A number of Jazz Improv Magazine's supporters - readers and writers - forwarded the diatribe that you publicly posted about your dissatisfaction with Jazz Improv.

I have no record of your contacting me to inquire about your concerns including why we did not run a number of the reviews that you wrote. Since you apparently did not want to discover from the source what the reasoning or truth may be, was your public posting of your "behind-the-back" criticism and dissatisfaction to "punish" or embarrass Jazz Improv Magazine?"

Such was my response:

"Well, it's your magazine, and you have the right to run anything you please. I'm not so concerned about the reasons why you didn't run most of the reviews I wrote (maybe you didn't like them. It's not really important). What I objected to, and what prompted me to fire off an angry post in a public forum, was having one of my reviews completely rewritten and yet published under my name as though I had penned it. As to why you did this, again it really doesn't matter. If you don't like what I write, it's your right not to run it, but if you feel the need to change my words, at least have the common decency not to put my name on it. Do what you like, but don't expect me to be quiet about it."

I don't know which part of this I find more insulting: The fact that they substantially altered my work, or the fact that they expected me to keep my mouth shut and not make my dissatisfaction public. As I said, I'm not planning on writing for them in the future...Not that they'd want me now!

I feel like Stanley Crouch! :g

Edited by Alexander
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...