Jump to content

Now reading...


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Penguin%252520no.%2525201356.jpg

I 'did' that for 'A' Level back in the early 70s. Didn't much care for it.

Reread it a few years back and enjoyed it a bit more.

Well, that's one that hasn't stood the test of time. It was on my 20th Century Literature reading list at Leeds University in 1962, along with giants like Lawrence, Eliot and Yeats. In a seminar with Geoffrey Hill (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_Hill) when I said that while Lawrence described his characters' state of soul, Snow was concerned with whether or not they got promoted, Hill responded by describing Snow's novel as "Whitehall gibberish".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Penguin%252520no.%2525201356.jpg

I 'did' that for 'A' Level back in the early 70s. Didn't much care for it.

Reread it a few years back and enjoyed it a bit more.

Well, that's one that hasn't stood the test of time. It was on my 20th Century Literature reading list at Leeds University in 1962, along with giants like Lawrence, Eliot and Yeats. In a seminar with Geoffrey Hill (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_Hill) when I said that while Lawrence described his characters' state of soul, Snow was concerned with whether or not they got promoted, Hill responded by describing Snow's novel as "Whitehall gibberish".

I seem to recall Snow was obsessed with the division between the 'arts' and the 'sciences'. Apparently people worried about that sort of thing then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Penguin%252520no.%2525201356.jpg

I 'did' that for 'A' Level back in the early 70s. Didn't much care for it.

Reread it a few years back and enjoyed it a bit more.

Well, that's one that hasn't stood the test of time. It was on my 20th Century Literature reading list at Leeds University in 1962, along with giants like Lawrence, Eliot and Yeats. In a seminar with Geoffrey Hill (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_Hill) when I said that while Lawrence described his characters' state of soul, Snow was concerned with whether or not they got promoted, Hill responded by describing Snow's novel as "Whitehall gibberish".

I seem to recall Snow was obsessed with the division between the 'arts' and the 'sciences'. Apparently people worried about that sort of thing then.

Yes, he made his name with "the two cultures". All seems a bit irrelevant now that government and business are prepared to junk academia generally. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Penguin%20no.%201356.jpg

I 'did' that for 'A' Level back in the early 70s. Didn't much care for it.

Reread it a few years back and enjoyed it a bit more.

Well, that's one that hasn't stood the test of time. It was on my 20th Century Literature reading list at Leeds University in 1962, along with giants like Lawrence, Eliot and Yeats. In a seminar with Geoffrey Hill (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_Hill) when I said that while Lawrence described his characters' state of soul, Snow was concerned with whether or not they got promoted, Hill responded by describing Snow's novel as "Whitehall gibberish".

I seem to recall Snow was obsessed with the division between the 'arts' and the 'sciences'. Apparently people worried about that sort of thing then.

Yes, he made his name with "the two cultures". All seems a bit irrelevant now that government and business are prepared to junk academia generally. :(

Well, in some ways the debates rage even greater than before. Most state universities in the US are under enormous pressure to promote STEM courses and other applied sciences and to junk the humanities. It isn't accurate to say that everything is under the knife equally.

Anyway, from the perspective of cultural studies, Snow's novels and Powell's A Dance to the Music of Time are way more valuable than Lawrence's writings, since it is precisely the office politics of the day that are intriguing, rather than sort of a neo-Rousseauian take on the state of the soul.

Of course, cultural studies departments may not survive the coming shake-out in academia...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Penguin%20no.%201356.jpg

I 'did' that for 'A' Level back in the early 70s. Didn't much care for it.

Reread it a few years back and enjoyed it a bit more.

Well, that's one that hasn't stood the test of time. It was on my 20th Century Literature reading list at Leeds University in 1962, along with giants like Lawrence, Eliot and Yeats. In a seminar with Geoffrey Hill (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_Hill) when I said that while Lawrence described his characters' state of soul, Snow was concerned with whether or not they got promoted, Hill responded by describing Snow's novel as "Whitehall gibberish".

I seem to recall Snow was obsessed with the division between the 'arts' and the 'sciences'. Apparently people worried about that sort of thing then.

Yes, he made his name with "the two cultures". All seems a bit irrelevant now that government and business are prepared to junk academia generally. :(

Anyway, from the perspective of cultural studies, Snow's novels and Powell's A Dance to the Music of Time are way more valuable than Lawrence's writings, since it is precisely the office politics of the day that are intriguing, rather than sort of a neo-Rousseauian take on the state of the soul.

Point taken, though things seemed different half a century ago in 1962.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just finished Lawrence Wright's incredible book about Scientology. Now onto Daniel Dennett's Breaking The Spell.



I ordered these two books a couple of days ago. I read Dawkins' The God Delusion at the time of its release, but felt that was enough. I'm not in need of convincing.

9780446697965_388_X586.jpgThe_End_of_Faith_cover.jpg



The Hitchens is good. A nice companion to The God Delusion. I have not read the Harris.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrapped up Grossman's Everything Flows. Not bad but 2/3 in he breaks from any attempt at fictionalizing his material and writes a long, long essay on the crimes of Lenin and Stalin (at the time it was still fashionable in the U.S.S.R. at any rate to be blaming everything on Stalin, since Lenin was still a "saint"). The book certainly doesn't succeed as a novel, but is interesting reading nonetheless. One of these days, I really will have to finish Life and Fate.

I am halfway done with Crummey's Galore, which is ok but I'm not loving it.

Next up after that is Steinbeck's Travels with Charley. Then things get lo-oong (Anna Karenina, Mahfouz's Cairo Trilogy and Proust, ideally starting that this summer).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41cZJyHrplL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

Postman brought this, this morning, and I've just finished it! Fascinating! And often hilarious!

I used to get R&B, blues & gospel records from him in the late 70s/early 80s. He's the first person I encountered who was a nut for singing preachers and I got quite a few sermons from him.

MG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Annotated Sherlock Holmes. Edited by Williams Baring-Gould. Been reading this one for about thirty-years and I still enjoy it very much. I really do not like the new Annotated Sherlock Holmes that came out awhile ago, not as charming or witty as the Baring-Gould version. The English just have a great way of writing in a "serious/fun" manner that is a pleasure to read and that Americans cannot seem to capture.

513Pg7BCS8L.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3867444500_e0b8990d25.jpg

Michael Ayrton - Tittivulus, or the verbiage collector

One of my old favourites. I've read it dozens of times and it still makes me laugh. A lot. Ayrton's drawings of the demonic fiends are as funny as the text.

C000013905_2.jpg

The executive cttee of hell - l-r Ashtaroth, Behemoth, Belphegor, Lucifer (Chairman), Nickegen, Mammon, Asmodeus

3565c060ada006eb0150d110.L.jpg

Tittivulus meets Dr Johnson

If you remember Ayrton's many appearances on 'Late night line-up' in the 60s, Tittivulus looks like Ayrton :)

ayrton-photo.jpg

MG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About halfway through Steinbeck's Travels with Charley. It is a pretty good read. Steinbeck's basic decency shines through his somewhat wry observations about the people he encounters on his trek.

The book I am reading on the bus is Lolita (fortunately no lurid cover!). I made it halfway through and stopped maybe a couple of years ago, so I decided to restart from the beginning. I am enjoying it a bit more on the second go-around, but I still don't think I'll ever really warm to Nabokov as a writer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51Ff63vSFwL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-stic

Really enjoying this.

1944-5. The D-Day landings have failed, Moscow and Stalingrad have fallen and Hitler's revived armies have invaded Britain. A story built round a small group of German soldiers who arrive in a remote Welsh village where only the women remain, the men having disappeared into the resistance. Beautifully evocative of the seasons and the impact of war on both the conquerors and the conquered. The counterfactual historic events are relayed lightly and at a distance, heard through rumour and occasional radio reception.

Very impressive.

Edited by A Lark Ascending
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...