Jump to content

RCA Victor Living Stereo

Late

By Late
in Re-issues

 Share

Recommended Posts

Late Collaborator

Late

Posted
Posted

This may have come up at some point in the what-are-you-listening-to thread (or somewhere else), but I thought I'd start a separate thread to draw attention to this wonderful series that I've only recently discovered. I guess it's been ongoing since 2004, and there have been six batches of titles to date.

This is the way a series should be done! Hybrid SACD, and with a list price of $11.99! Right now, I'm listening to Julian Bream's Spanish Guitar Classics, and it is phenomenal, both musically and sonically.

Don't sleep on this series like I did for so long. It doesn't seem likely to go out-of-print any time soon, but the music demands hearing. I couldn't find a complete list anywhere (not even on the Sony/BMG site), but Tower seems to carry most of them, and for a couple bucks under list, here.

Any favorites in this series?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Late Collaborator

Late

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Forgot to add that many discs in this series — even though they hail from the late 50's/early 60's — are actually in genuine multichannel sound — nothing artificially "rechanneled." I don't have a multichannel player, but I bet they sound awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HolyStitt Newbie

HolyStitt

Posted
Posted

I have tried to follow which releases were in the series, but also seem to have a problem finding a definitive list, so thank you for the link.

So far I only have the Reiner Bartok: Concerto for Orchestra/Music for Strings, Percussion and Celesta/Hungarian Sketches & Also sprach Zarathustra/Ein Heldenleben, but this list has pointed me in the direction of a few more titles. :tup

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DMP Newbie

DMP

Posted
Posted

The multi-channel aspect, when it's available on these, is just for 3 channels. And you're right - this is a fine series - excellent (and, in a couple of cases, very popular) recordings reissued in a first-class way. I read once that the old Columbia catalog would enjoy a similar reissue program, now that the companies have merged, but haven't heard anything about that lately and wonder if it's still in the works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Claude Newbie

Claude

Posted
Posted (edited)

I read once that the old Columbia catalog would enjoy a similar reissue program, now that the companies have merged, but haven't heard anything about that lately and wonder if it's still in the works.

In fact most of the Sony Classical SACDs released so far consist of vintage recordings, but there haven't been new SACD reissues for years. Some titles available on single layer SACDs (most of which are now OOP) have been reissued on DSD-mastered CDs.

http://www.sa-cd.net/titles/0/1/date/5/1

I agree that the Living Stereo SACDs are excellent. I have most of them.

http://www.sa-cd.net/titles/0/296/date/100/1

Edited by Claude
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chewy-chew-chew-bean-benitez Apprentice

chewy-chew-chew-bean-benitez

Posted
Posted

I dont mean to pull a Freakouldt on you guys: BUT WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU GUYS OH MY GOD I DONT EVEN KNOW WHERE TO BEGIN WITH THIS::::::: THE WHOLE BEAUTY OF RCA VICTOR LIVING STEREO WAS THAT IT WAS FOR ***RECORDS*** AND IF YOU REISSUE AN RCA VICTOR LIVING STEREO ALBUM ON DIGITAL COMPACT DISC IT DOES NOT TRANSLATE AND THE WHOLE BEAUTY OF RCA LIVING STEREO IS LOST>>>>>>>ITS AKIN TO, OH, IF I CUT A WHOLE IN MY CYBILL SHEPHERD ALBUM COVER AND MADE SEXY-TIME WITH IT, AND THEN GOING AROUND SAYING I HOOKED UP WITH CYBILL SHEPHERD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
4XB Newbie

4XB

Posted
Posted

I dont mean to pull a Freakouldt on you guys: BUT WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU GUYS OH MY GOD I DONT EVEN KNOW WHERE TO BEGIN WITH THIS::::::: THE WHOLE BEAUTY OF RCA VICTOR LIVING STEREO WAS THAT IT WAS FOR ***RECORDS*** AND IF YOU REISSUE AN RCA VICTOR LIVING STEREO ALBUM ON DIGITAL COMPACT DISC IT DOES NOT TRANSLATE AND THE WHOLE BEAUTY OF RCA LIVING STEREO IS LOST>>>>>>>ITS AKIN TO, OH, IF I CUT A WHOLE IN MY CYBILL SHEPHERD ALBUM COVER AND MADE SEXY-TIME WITH IT, AND THEN GOING AROUND SAYING I HOOKED UP WITH CYBILL SHEPHERD.

:tup:tup:tup

D`nt Fool with a Fool!!! (Ben Webster) :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kevin Bresnahan Experienced

Kevin Bresnahan

Posted
Posted

I dont mean to pull a Freakouldt on you guys: BUT WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU GUYS OH MY GOD I DONT EVEN KNOW WHERE TO BEGIN WITH THIS::::::: THE WHOLE BEAUTY OF RCA VICTOR LIVING STEREO WAS THAT IT WAS FOR ***RECORDS*** AND IF YOU REISSUE AN RCA VICTOR LIVING STEREO ALBUM ON DIGITAL COMPACT DISC IT DOES NOT TRANSLATE AND THE WHOLE BEAUTY OF RCA LIVING STEREO IS LOST>>>>>>>ITS AKIN TO, OH, IF I CUT A WHOLE IN MY CYBILL SHEPHERD ALBUM COVER AND MADE SEXY-TIME WITH IT, AND THEN GOING AROUND SAYING I HOOKED UP WITH CYBILL SHEPHERD.

If you heard one of these recordings on 3 channel SACD, you'd cream your pants as if you were with Cybill Shepherd. The realism acheived with the full sound stage of 3 channels cannot be described. You can't get this from vinyl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Late Collaborator

Late

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Would you agree or disagree with AMG's review of Heifetz's recording of Bruch's Violin Concerto:

"When these recordings were made in the early '60s, Jascha Heifetz was reaching the end of his long and successful career. And, unfortunately, it sounds that way. His once polished virtuoso technique was starting to fray -- fast passages are smudged, long lines are blurred, bow strokes are too vehement -- and his once famous tone was beginning to dim -- what had been focused, intense, and riveting is now narrow, thin, and even occasionally cracked. While these qualities might conceivably have worked in some repertoire -- possibly Prokofiev or Shostakovich, perhaps Stravinsky or Schoenberg -- they don't work at all in Bruch's lyrically expansive Violin Concerto No. 1 and ardently nostalgic Scottish Fantasy or in Vieuxtemps' brilliant to the point of brittleness Violin Concerto No. 5. Accompanied by the enthusiastic but insensitive Malcolm Sargent leading the professional but lackluster New Symphony Orchestra of London -- a nom de registrement for an otherwise anonymous group of London session players -- Heifetz sounds like he's merely going through the motions."

Ouch!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
J.A.W. Apprentice

J.A.W.

Posted
Posted (edited)

Would you agree or disagree with AMG's review of Heifetz's recording of Bruch's Violin Concerto:

"When these recordings were made in the early '60s, Jascha Heifetz was reaching the end of his long and successful career. And, unfortunately, it sounds that way. His once polished virtuoso technique was starting to fray -- fast passages are smudged, long lines are blurred, bow strokes are too vehement -- and his once famous tone was beginning to dim -- what had been focused, intense, and riveting is now narrow, thin, and even occasionally cracked. While these qualities might conceivably have worked in some repertoire -- possibly Prokofiev or Shostakovich, perhaps Stravinsky or Schoenberg -- they don't work at all in Bruch's lyrically expansive Violin Concerto No. 1 and ardently nostalgic Scottish Fantasy or in Vieuxtemps' brilliant to the point of brittleness Violin Concerto No. 5. Accompanied by the enthusiastic but insensitive Malcolm Sargent leading the professional but lackluster New Symphony Orchestra of London -- a nom de registrement for an otherwise anonymous group of London session players -- Heifetz sounds like he's merely going through the motions."

Ouch!

It's been many years since I heard this performance and I don't own the CD, so I can't really comment.

I found this Gramophone (U.K.) review of the earlier CD reissue of these recordings:

Reviewed: Gramophone 3/1988, Edward Greenfield

As Trevor Harvey pointed out in his original review in 1962, this Heifetz version of the Scottish Fantasy has some cuts, small ones in orchestral tuttis, but substantial ones in the finale, reducing it by some three minutes. Even then TH was prepared to forgive the aberration when this master among virtuosos was inspired to ''far more than acrobatics''. Now as we mourn Heifetz's death, it makes a superb memorial issue, and I totally endorse TH's praise for the Maestro's ''range of colour, his subtlety of line, his feeling''. Even more than most of his records of the post-war period, this account of the Scottish Fantasy makes nonsense of the idea of Heifetz as either cold or ruthless, when it so consistently speaks of his deep personal love of a then-neglected work.

The G minor Concerto too (originally coupled with Mozart's No. 4 in A) finds Heifetz at his sweetest and most sympathetic, with even the incidental passagework shaped winningly. It is a lesson too that though the balance of the soloist is close, there is never any mistaking as I fear there often is with Itzhak Perlman's even more marked preference for close balancing whether or not the soloist is producing a genuine pianissimo. With Heifetz one fully registers the hush even from an instrument placed close, magically so in the slow movement.

Like the Scottish Fantasy, with which it was originally coupled on LP, the Vieuxtemps needs and gets a committedly persuasive advocate here. The work is no longer as neglected as when this recording originally appeared, but there is no more commanding version than this on disc. Unlike some of the earlier RCA transfers to CD of Heifetz performances these English-made recordings come up very well indeed in the new digital transfer, with the violin sound very full and immediate and with a fine sense of presence and only the occasional hardness on orchestral violin tone to betray age. Generous measure too.'

Edward Greenfield

Edited by J.A.W.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Late Collaborator

Late

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks for posting that review, Hans. I actually haven't heard Heifetz's edition of the Bruch, but was thinking about picking it up after hearing Akiko Suwanai's edition and reading how hers compared favorably to Heifetz's.

My ears aren't as discerning when it comes to classical music, but the AMG review raised my eyebrows. Could Heifetz's performance possibly be that failed? I generally try to decide for myself, but when I'm exploring a branch of music that's relatively new to me ... :blink:

=======

Another discovery (along RCA lines) — EMI has at least three series in their classical catalog that appear to all contain the same recordings ... possibly with different remasterings?

• EMI Great Recordings of the Century

• EMI Historical

• EMI Encore

For example, you can purchase certain Maria Callas recordings of what seems to be the same material in all three series. I guess I'll figure things out eventually ... :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
J.A.W. Apprentice

J.A.W.

Posted
Posted (edited)

Another discovery (along RCA lines) — EMI has at least three series in their classical catalog that appear to all contain the same recordings ... possibly with different remasterings?

• EMI Great Recordings of the Century

• EMI Historical

• EMI Encore

For example, you can purchase certain Maria Callas recordings of what seems to be the same material in all three series. I guess I'll figure things out eventually ... :wacko:

EMI reissued their top (or maybe I should say "most popular") classical recordings time and time again, most of them in new remasterings. The "Great Recordings of the Century" series is 24-bit remastered, but I don't like the sound on the ones I had: too aggressive, especially the string sound.

Edited by J.A.W.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 years later...
mikeweil Mentor

mikeweil

Posted
Posted

I dont mean to pull a Freakouldt on you guys: BUT WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH  YOU GUYS OH MY GOD I DONT EVEN KNOW WHERE TO BEGIN WITH THIS:::::::  THE WHOLE BEAUTY OF RCA VICTOR LIVING STEREO WAS THAT IT WAS FOR ***RECORDS*** AND IF YOU REISSUE AN RCA VICTOR LIVING STEREO ALBUM ON DIGITAL COMPACT DISC IT DOES NOT TRANSLATE AND THE WHOLE BEAUTY OF RCA LIVING STEREO IS LOST>>>>>>>ITS AKIN TO, OH, IF I CUT A WHOLE IN MY CYBILL SHEPHERD ALBUM COVER AND MADE SEXY-TIME WITH IT, AND THEN GOING AROUND SAYING I HOOKED UP WITH CYBILL SHEPHERD.

I see your point, but if you have SACD playback equipment, these really do sound awesome.

If there is anything in audio playback that can come close to good vinyl playback, it's SACD, given the original recording was well done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Claude Newbie

Claude

Posted
Posted

I see your point, but if you have SACD playback equipment, these really do sound awesome.

If there is anything in audio playback that can come close to good vinyl playback, it's SACD, given the original recording was well done.

And SACD has a bonus vinyl can't offer. Many of these Living Stereo productions were 3-track recordings. The SACD reissues contain both the 3-track mix (on the right/center/left channels of the multichannel layer) and the stereo downmix (on the stereo layer).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...