bluesoul

The Lost Tapes: Charles Mingus Live In Detroit

131 posts in this topic

4 hours ago, felser said:

Has anyone listened to the 40 minute Roy Brooks interview on this set?  Worth the listening time?

Yes, at least one time. After that, ymmv. But it's nice to hear people talking instead of just reading it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am listening to the cut of Pithacanthropus Erectus on Jazz Wax, and I gotta say that there is something about the Mingus band of this recording and this era that just doesn't appeal to me. Aside from the tenor solo on this, which is weak and repetitious, it just seems to me that Mingus has run out of Steam at this point, and really afterwards, in his career. I heard various permutations of the Mingus group a bunch of times in the 5 year period from maybe '73-78, and it never got to me except at certain moments. Other than Pullen and later Bob Neloms, few if any of the soloists pulled me in like the earlier band had. And even Mingus' writing seemed at times to be parodying himself. I don't know. I hope I change my mind some day, but I just never want to listen through.  Mingus seems to be repeating himself, with a lesser band. Maybe it's the problem of the changes was jazz going through, but it doesn't seem on the cutting edge any more - and maybe it doesn't have to be. But the compositional work/performance dynamic seems neither "contemporary" nor revisionist/retro; I find it all very unsatisfying,

Edited by AllenLowe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, JSngry said:

Yes, at least one time. After that, ymmv. But it's nice to hear people talking instead of just reading it.

Ditto. Good listening. 

I emailed the label about the extra track on the download not on the cd set. Their reply seemed (to me) cryptic:

“The full audio from the tapes would not fit on the chosen format hence additional passes.”

They later said “additional passes”means “everything that was on the tapes.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Brad said:

Ditto. Good listening. 

I emailed the label about the extra track on the download not on the cd set. Their reply seemed (to me) cryptic:

“The full audio from the tapes would not fit on the chosen format hence additional passes.”

They later said “additional passes”means “everything that was on the tapes.”

The extra cut is 19+ minutes.  There is less than 19 minutes of content on the fifth CD, so even adding that cut would still make the fifth CD less than 40 minutes.  So "cryptic" is too good a word...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope this doesn’t sound like a dumb question but a few cuts in the set are denominated alternative takes. How do you have alternative takes in a live recording, especially one that has never been previously issued. Aren’t they just songs played during different sets?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Brad said:

Hope this doesn’t sound like a dumb question but a few cuts in the set are denominated alternative takes. How do you have alternative takes in a live recording, especially one that has never been previously issued. Aren’t they just songs played during different sets?

I'm sure that would be what it is.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not at all a dumb question. If anything's "dumb", it's calling them that!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently there were multiple sets. I have always hoped the Complete Blakey at The Jazz Corner of the World from 1960 would come out one day, even if it is more takes of the same tunes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bud Spangler clearly announces that it was 3 sets/night. I thought I heard him imply that they would be broadcasting the first two, but maybe that's not what he meant. Either way, those are not "alternate takes" as anybody would define them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all for the answers. I suppose there are more tapes but not all were released. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a further response from the label, as follows:

“the decisions relating to the final audio involved numerous people & were taken internally & as we understand it were in part if not all - relating to issues of space.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Brad said:

I received a further response from the label, as follows:

“the decisions relating to the final audio involved numerous people & were taken internally & as we understand it were in part if not all - relating to issues of space.”

 

Again, there is tons of space on those discs.  Three of them have 15-20 minutes of free space, one has 35-40 minutes of free space, one has an hour of free space, is less than 20 minutes long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe it was the LP set version that set the overall limitations and not the CDs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, sidewinder said:

Maybe it was the LP set version that set the overall limitations and not the CDs?

That could be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked them about the cd set and was clear that I was referring to the cd set. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Brad said:

I asked them about the cd set and was clear that I was referring to the cd set. 

Then they aren't giving you a straight answer.  They had room for about 2.5 hours more of material on those five CD's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Folks — Earlier in this thread I addressed what appears to be real reason behind the stray digital only track.,The producer told me that Sue Mingus and the estate added this track at the last possible second and insisted it be included. Production at that point was too far along to add it to the CDs. I can't believe it was "discovered" later than the other material, so -- and here I am speculating -- there must have been some communication issue between Sue and the producer or some other issue that went sideways for this to land as it did.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mark, I had sent my question before you made your post and I thought their various responses might be of interest, realizing that ultimately it doesn’t matter since the set is already made. I found their communication is a bit wanting but that’s life. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Brad said:

Mark, I had sent my question before you made your post and I thought their various responses might be of interest, realizing that ultimately it doesn’t matter since the set is already made. I found their communication is a bit wanting but that’s life. 

Got it, and I agree the responses you got were inadequate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fwiw, I just received this response:

“Lee is going to look at this closely Brad 
needs to refresh his memory as there were many changes made to the final product since the tapes were first located near 2 years ago”

The email was in response to my thought that there would have been space on the last disc to fit the song. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got my copy but I hesitate to open it yet, because the last response almost suggests they might repress with the extra track. Kinda puzzling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so, it seems Mingus agreed with me, according to a post elsewhere on this site from someone who witnessed this group around this time:

"I do remember that Mingus was increasingly unhappy with his side men through the evening, including Roy Brooks (who was the only one of them I thought I remembered, so thank you for confirming).  To the point where he scowled at them and told them all to lay out while he played a very extended bass solo."

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mingus sounds still-medicated when he speaks here. I agree that other than Pullen, there would be no compelling reason to grab this release if it had been offered in real-ish time. But that time has long passed. Knowing what would soon come next (the return of Dannie, then Bluiett, then Adams, and then Walrath, and then the major Changes One album), I enjoy listening to this material (a few times, anyway) as the proverbial "period of transition" for Mingus as he returned to his "hollering at the band" form.

But objectively, yeah, Joe Gardner, hmmm. Stubblefield, still not fully developed, still playing essentially the same solo on everything (like Booker Ervin in that way, only without the life-on-the-line urgency). And Brooks is fine as he wants to be. But he ain't Dannie. Ain't nobody Dannie, ever/never.

But - it's a great package, you can feel the love in it. I don't know if it's of historic importance (probably not), but it is of historic interest. I'd buy it again, without hesitation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.