J.A.W.

Verve/Hip-O Select will be releasing a Clifford Brown 4CD-set with the EmArcy Brown/Roach master takes. A set with Clifford Brown's EmArcy dates with singers will be released later. Full details here. I'm perfectly happy with my Complete Clifford Brown 10CD-set that came out in the early 1990s, so I won't be buying the upcoming sets

Trumpeters Willie Thomas and Paul Serrano, alto saxophonists John Jenkins and Bunky Green, pianists John Young and Chris Anderson.

It's probably me, but I don't see the "donate" button.

As I posted earlier in this thread, only IE8 has that button and only when sites are recognized as being incompatible with IE8.

I get that, too. I'm on IE8. It's confusing if it doesn't always happen the same way. You close a window, rather than doing a "back", and you find you're out on your arse MG Well, if you hit the "compatibility display" button, everything will surely fall into place. See my earlier post about this.

hmmm not seeing it - maybe i'm using IE 7 - i can't figure out how to find out what version of IE i am using either. I'm a mess! Only IE8 has that button, and only on sites that it recognizes as being incompatible with IE8.

I think I've found a solution to the IE8 problem - I hit the "compatibility display" button at the right of the address bar at the top of the page and everything fell into place. The board looks great now on IE8!

Are you using IE7 or IE8, Ed? I'm using 7 Hans I'm asking because IE seems to be the culprit here.

Are you using IE7 or IE8, Ed?

Looks pretty good on Opera, too.

No, sorry, it's still the same - not good. On Firefox it's still great (to add a positive note )

Same here. It does seem that IE8 is having problems with the new set-up. So far Neveronfriday seems to be the only member whose IE8 displays the board as it's supposed to be.

Nope, it isn't, I'm getting the same weird display on IE8 as described by Van Basten II.

To post here I'm using Firefox, IE8 is too problematic.

My IE8 is the very latest version (I check updates every week) and I'm still getting that weird display. I'm using IE8 with XP (SP3).

That's exactly what I got with IE8, but on Firefox it's fine.

"View new content" at the top right-hand corner.

I guess this means that I have to turn off the sound on my computer every time I "view new content"

I had it but now it seems to be gone. Perhaps it's in the settings. Not sure. BTW, did you get my pm? Yes, I did get it and typed a reply, but when I hit the send button the board was down. Thanks for the heads up, but I'd already seen the set. I'm watching it. By the way, the music's still there... Sorry about the other day by the way No problem Jim, The new forum is an enormous mess on my IE8, but it's great on Firefox...

I had it but now it seems to be gone. Perhaps it's in the settings. Not sure. BTW, did you get my pm? Yes, I did get it and typed a reply, but when I hit the send button the board was down. Thanks for the heads up, but I'd already seen the set. I'm watching it. By the way, the music's still there...

Can the accompanying music be switched off?

That's now "view new content" at the top right-hand corner.

I am looking for this Mosaic 4CD-set in excellent or better condition: The Complete Edmond Hall/James P. Johnson/Sidney De Paris/Vic Dickenson Blue Note Sessions - Mosaic MD4-109 (including booklet and box) PayPal is my only payment option. Please PM me if you're selling your copy or know where I can get one.

If you were not unaware that it was a violation of board policy, then why did you post the whole interview? Just curious Dave said he not aware of the policy. Accordingly, how would he have known that he couldn't post the interview. Please read his post carefully - he first asked if it had occurred to anyone that he was unaware, then he said he was not, ergo: he said he was not unaware. I'm (now) guessing that's not what he meant, but it's what he said. I read his post carefully and here it is: "Has it occurred to anyone that I was unaware that this was a violation of board policy? The fact of the matter is, I was not." Although the point is moot because Dave says otherwise (although that's not what he intended), a reasonable reading of the first sentence is that he was unaware of the policy. However, the second sentence seems to trip him up: "I was not." Or does it? When I read that (since Dave said he was unaware of the policy in the first sentence), the logical interpretation is that the second means he was "not" aware of the policy, not that he deliberately violated it. Otherwise, the use of the term "the fact of the matter" doesn't make sense. Good grief, you want to be right, don't you... I'll take Chuck's advise and let it go