Jump to content

Aggie87

Members
  • Posts

    11,445
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

Everything posted by Aggie87

  1. Already mentioned in the Blue Note 2007 reissues thread. Along with 4 other apparent Rare Grooves.
  2. What happened to Chuck? I haven't noticed any posting in a while. Hope all's well - maybe he's wrapping up some reissues?
  3. Beatles '65 is in both stereo and mono, on cd, on the Beatles Capitol Albums Vol 1 (along with Meet the Beatles, The Beatles Second Album, and Something New): Vol 2 includes The Early Beatles, Beatles VI, the Help! soundtrack, and the U.S. version of Rubber Soul.
  4. I'll disagree with that. Though I'd love to see (and would surely enjoy) Fripp & Bruford playing like that.
  5. It seems pretty clear that NOBODY'S arguing that point. Nobody wants to see a child suffering, clearly. That goes without saying. If that's what you believe you're defending against the hordes of Org board members who think children *should* be abused, we're clearly not speaking the same language. What is being argued and you are about the only one defending is the credibility of a psychic's word. Again, a psychic's word is no more believable than a person who plays with a ouija board or someone who reports abuse because the giant purple spaghetti monster told them a kid with pig tails is being abused.
  6. Lionel Loueke - Karibu Freddie Redd - Shades of Redd
  7. ChaunceyMorehouse writes like Clem and mysteriously writes about the same issues as Clem. Smells like Clem. Walks like Clem. Looks like Clem, apparently I'm not the only one who thinks so. But Chauncey claims to be a 64 year old grandmother! Though a grandmother that's equally at home discussing handjobs and Thom Yorke's solo album and Radiohead's humor-impaired fans. How many 64 yr olds would even have a clue about what Radiohead fans are like? Or know Organissimo board members as well as she does after only being on the board for 10 days?
  8. So the only reason she was reported WAS because of the psychic, not her behavior. Amazing! The words of a psychic who doesn't even know the name of his "target" is credible, in the school's eyes. At least the Children's Aid Society has some common sense.
  9. It's probably an age thing, where you simply grow out of what's popular, and stick with what was popular when you were a certain age. Teens today will probably look back with nostalgia about the music they're listening to now, once they reach our ages, just as we do with the music we liked back then.
  10. Here comes an unusual one:
  11. No dead horse here. Nobody witnessed any abuse, nor were there any visible signs of abuse on the girl. Can you re-read the article and show me where the "known instance" of child abuse is discussed and described? If it's a known instance, then there has to be some details there. Yet there are none. Since there was none, the only other choice (in your California law example) is reasonable suspicion. I remain unconvinced that the word of a random psychic who didn't even name a particular child is "reasonable suspicion".
  12. There was no "known" incident though. So the only thing to report would be reasonable suspicion. The "psychic" (who IS equivalent to a spaghetti monster in this case) picked a random letter and told someone that a kid with that initial was being abused. That ISN'T reasonable suspicion, to most (reasonable) people, I don't think.
  13. "The Big Purple Spaghetti Monster said my neighbor is abusing his kid. Or my cat told me that, I forget which." Is that something a teacher has to report? Because it's really no different than a psychic saying it (and that psychic didn't even single out a kid, but just picked a random letter). That's "reasonable suspicion"???
  14. Agreed!!
  15. "REASONABLY SUSPECTED". I think a psychic's word isn't reasonable suspicion in this case.
  16. I think this is kind of a cool crop circle. It's a graphic representation of pi, 3.141592654... (with the decimal point and the ... even!) I've always considered these to be man-made, but this one seems very well done.
  17. My guess would be board member David Weiss and the New Jazz Composer's Octet. David mentioned (here) that there is a new NJCO cd coming out in June with Hubbard.
  18. Have a good one!
  19. He looks like he'd pay $1M to be anywhere else!
  20. I think they would have matched up better with the Celtics too, actually.
  21. ...maybe somebody can call Lou and ask him to record it? Anybody have his phone number?
  22. It looks like that site pulls in a wiki entry along with it. I arbitrarily replaced "Chris_albertson" with "Blue_Oyster_Cult", and it came up like this: Kulkul w/BOC edit - also if you go to another sub-page on Kukul's website, and then back to the "birthday" page, you are no longer there. So I don't think your information is actually on that site itself.
×
×
  • Create New...