I understand the antitrust implications, but I still don't understand the idea of a lockout. Does the union still exist or not?
If there is a possibility of playing with replacement players, then all the world is not locked out - apparently only those former members of a union which no longer exists.
Perhaps the union does still exist legally, and my assumption of the meaning of decertification is wrong.
By the way, something to keep in mind...I remember reading a few months ago the prediction/reminder that although all of the press would paint the scenario as owners vs. players, the real issue is owners vs. owners. Apparently some owners are doing just fine, while others are hurting. My understanding (and this may be wrong) is that teams that have been owned by a family for decades have inferior stadium revenues and can't keep up with the new money types like Daniel Snyder. I also understand that some recent owners borrowed too much money to buy the team, and are spending so much on their debt that they cannot compete with those in more comfortable circumstances.