Here's the exact evaluation - "Few of these dates, however, are considered among Mobley's best." "Are considered", as in "you ask 10 people what the Hank Mobley records are and these are not likely to be among them" And from my experience, that would be accurate. Hell Marchel Ivery, who grew up in that era and dug the shit outta Hank, always talked about the Soul Station and beyond albums. Everybody I knew did. And truthfully, as great as those '50's sessions are, is anybody really going to seriously say that the '60's sessions, especially up to and including Dippin' aren't more refined in terms of both Hank's solo voice and his group concept?
And Japanese LPs? In 1986? You're expecting a guy to locate a source (considerably easier now than then, believe me!) and spend big big bucks just to write an article the pay of which probably wouldn't cover the cost of those albums? Uh....yeah...sure.
Just as we need to be able to listen "in context" of the times, so should we be able to read.
I don't disagree with most of what you say. I just think that if he was familiar with them, those records shouldn't just have been blown off. And if someone was going to write an article and blow them off that readily, one would assume that he had heard the music.
Just checked my 50's Mobley Japanese LPs - one of them still has a Tower price tag on it - $10.99. LPs went for what - $7 or so in the 80's? So that's not way out of whack - especially if you wanted to hear early Hank Mobley back then.