What exactly was Joe Henderson's issue with Michael Brecker's

[CJ Shearn]

I have been thinking about this one, I think Jim Sangrey brought it up here once, that Henderson called Brecker an "imitator". I've heard Henderson licks in Mike's playing before, but did Joe feel he wasn't properly acknowledged for the influence? Brecker always said how much of an impact Joe had on his playing.

[paul secor]

Perhaps recognition? Perhaps $?

[sonnymax]

How does acknowledging your influences make you any less an imitator? Perhaps Henderson believed Brecker wasn't bringing anything new to the table. Hence, he's an imitator, rather than an innovator.

[CJ Shearn]

Good point. I just never understood why Henderson was so sour about it.

[JSngry]

You gotta remember that until he signed w/Verve, Joe was very much a "cult figure", a "musicians' musician" as far as the general jazz public was concerned. Brecker was a "big name" long before Joe even got to be a whisper in the larger game.

[CJ Shearn]

Right..... even though Joe had that incredible creative run with Milestone, whether it worked musically all the time, IDK..... still strong though. I think maybe Joe thought "hey I did this first" and someone else was taking the credit in bringing it to a larger audience. I think Jimmy Smith felt the same way with how the media treated Joey DeFrancesco when he was first coming up and paid him all that attention being the young guy bringing jazz organ back.

Edited August 5, 2010 by CJ Shearn

[felser]

Right..... even though Joe had that incredible creative run with Milestone, whether it worked musically all the time, IDK..... still strong though. I think maybe Joe thought "hey I did this first" and someone else was taking the credit in bringing it to a larger audience. I think Jimmy Smith felt the same way with how the media treated Joey DeFrancesco when he was first coming up and paid him all that attention being the young guy bringing jazz organ back.

Did Brecker really sound that much like Henderson? I've certainly never mistaken one for the other (for that matter, I've never mistaken Smith and DeFrancesco for each other either). Brecker did seem at times to bring a certain facile-but-sterile genericism to the "state of the art" of tenor playing that I think has been negative impact. But the same has been true of other "name" players of the last 30 years (hello Pat Metheny and John Scofield, howze it going, Brad Mehldau and latter-day Herbie Hancock, good to see ya, post-'Blues Alley' Wynton Marsalis).

[JSngry]

Did Brecker really sound that much like Henderson?

Tonally, not even remotely. Vocabulary-wise...there are "overlaps".

[CJ Shearn]

Did Brecker really sound that much like Henderson?

Tonally, not even remotely. Vocabulary-wise...there are "overlaps".

Exactly. Like the fast trill lick that goes to a ritardando. I never mistook Henderson for Brecker or Smith for DeFrancesco either.

Edited August 5, 2010 by CJ Shearn

[Saxophone Tall]

As a tenor player of 51+ years, Mike sounded nothing like Joe at all: tone, conception, role, vocabulary, nothing. Joe was understandably pissed off that the larger media ignored him.  Both brought something new to the table, but Joe could never be said to be "facile but sterile."  Mike at times, could.  One of Mike's strengths is that this this not always the case.  Sure, he was over-recorded with all sorts of pop groups, but his solo shit is off the hook.  Both advanced the state of the horn, and nobody has since.  The "facile but sterile" crowd seems to grow daily.  "You can throw a brick 10 feet and hit 10 tenor players with Brecker chops, but none with taste" (Chritopher Pitts).