CJ Shearn Posted August 5, 2010 Report Posted August 5, 2010 I have been thinking about this one, I think Jim Sangrey brought it up here once, that Henderson called Brecker an "imitator". I've heard Henderson licks in Mike's playing before, but did Joe feel he wasn't properly acknowledged for the influence? Brecker always said how much of an impact Joe had on his playing. Quote
sonnymax Posted August 5, 2010 Report Posted August 5, 2010 How does acknowledging your influences make you any less an imitator? Perhaps Henderson believed Brecker wasn't bringing anything new to the table. Hence, he's an imitator, rather than an innovator. Quote
CJ Shearn Posted August 5, 2010 Author Report Posted August 5, 2010 Good point. I just never understood why Henderson was so sour about it. Quote
JSngry Posted August 5, 2010 Report Posted August 5, 2010 You gotta remember that until he signed w/Verve, Joe was very much a "cult figure", a "musicians' musician" as far as the general jazz public was concerned. Brecker was a "big name" long before Joe even got to be a whisper in the larger game. Quote
CJ Shearn Posted August 5, 2010 Author Report Posted August 5, 2010 (edited) Right..... even though Joe had that incredible creative run with Milestone, whether it worked musically all the time, IDK..... still strong though. I think maybe Joe thought "hey I did this first" and someone else was taking the credit in bringing it to a larger audience. I think Jimmy Smith felt the same way with how the media treated Joey DeFrancesco when he was first coming up and paid him all that attention being the young guy bringing jazz organ back. Edited August 5, 2010 by CJ Shearn Quote
felser Posted August 5, 2010 Report Posted August 5, 2010 Right..... even though Joe had that incredible creative run with Milestone, whether it worked musically all the time, IDK..... still strong though. I think maybe Joe thought "hey I did this first" and someone else was taking the credit in bringing it to a larger audience. I think Jimmy Smith felt the same way with how the media treated Joey DeFrancesco when he was first coming up and paid him all that attention being the young guy bringing jazz organ back. Did Brecker really sound that much like Henderson? I've certainly never mistaken one for the other (for that matter, I've never mistaken Smith and DeFrancesco for each other either). Brecker did seem at times to bring a certain facile-but-sterile genericism to the "state of the art" of tenor playing that I think has been negative impact. But the same has been true of other "name" players of the last 30 years (hello Pat Metheny and John Scofield, howze it going, Brad Mehldau and latter-day Herbie Hancock, good to see ya, post-'Blues Alley' Wynton Marsalis). Quote
JSngry Posted August 5, 2010 Report Posted August 5, 2010 Did Brecker really sound that much like Henderson? Tonally, not even remotely. Vocabulary-wise...there are "overlaps". Quote
CJ Shearn Posted August 5, 2010 Author Report Posted August 5, 2010 (edited) Did Brecker really sound that much like Henderson? Tonally, not even remotely. Vocabulary-wise...there are "overlaps". Exactly. Like the fast trill lick that goes to a ritardando. I never mistook Henderson for Brecker or Smith for DeFrancesco either. Edited August 5, 2010 by CJ Shearn Quote
Saxophone Tall Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 As a tenor player of 51+ years, Mike sounded nothing like Joe at all: tone, conception, role, vocabulary, nothing. Joe was understandably pissed off that the larger media ignored him. Both brought something new to the table, but Joe could never be said to be "facile but sterile." Mike at times, could. One of Mike's strengths is that this this not always the case. Sure, he was over-recorded with all sorts of pop groups, but his solo shit is off the hook. Both advanced the state of the horn, and nobody has since. The "facile but sterile" crowd seems to grow daily. "You can throw a brick 10 feet and hit 10 tenor players with Brecker chops, but none with taste" (Chritopher Pitts). Quote
nikogutierrezjazz Posted Thursday at 04:03 PM Report Posted Thursday at 04:03 PM On 1/13/2025 at 12:41 AM, Saxophone Tall said: As a tenor player of 51+ years, Mike sounded nothing like Joe at all: tone, conception, role, vocabulary, nothing. Joe was understandably pissed off that the larger media ignored him. Both brought something new to the table, but Joe could never be said to be "facile but sterile." Mike at times, could. One of Mike's strengths is that this this not always the case. Sure, he was over-recorded with all sorts of pop groups, but his solo shit is off the hook. Both advanced the state of the horn, and nobody has since. The "facile but sterile" crowd seems to grow daily. "You can throw a brick 10 feet and hit 10 tenor players with Brecker chops, but none with taste" (Chritopher Pitts). Joe was just the better player who didn't want to play outside of jazz, even though most of Brecker's solo stuff isn't even really jazz, but he still was using Joe's vocab, which I think offended Hendy, the fact that he was playing his licks on smooth jazz albums and not giving him credit lol. Quote
Peter Friedman Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago On 8/5/2010 at 10:42 AM, felser said: Did Brecker really sound that much like Henderson? I've certainly never mistaken one for the other (for that matter, I've never mistaken Smith and DeFrancesco for each other either). Brecker did seem at times to bring a certain facile-but-sterile genericism to the "state of the art" of tenor playing that I think has been negative impact. But the same has been true of other "name" players of the last 30 years (hello Pat Metheny and John Scofield, howze it going, Brad Mehldau and latter-day Herbie Hancock, good to see ya, post-'Blues Alley' Wynton Marsalis). I never really cared for Mike Brecker (did like a number of Randy Breckers Albums). Felt the same way About Pat Metheny, and Brad Mehldau. Quote
Milestones Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago "Brecker's solo stuff isn't even really jazz." Really? I mean, really? Quote
felser Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago And the tables (possibly) turned. There's a story (maybe apochryphal) about Kenny G coming up to Brecker at a festival and saying to Brecker something like "you are so great! I can't understand why I'm so much more popular when you're so great!" and Brecker simply replying "neither can I" and walking away. Not sure where I first heard that story, maybe even here... Quote
Milestones Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago Coming back to the original strange statement about Brecker not playing real jazz, those who know and love real jazz just need to listen him on those records on Impulse and Verve. And then, too, maybe someone should ask why Herbie Hancock, Pat Metheny, Dave Holland, Elvin Jones, McCoy Tyner, Charlie Haden, Jack DeJohnette, etc. were out there playing "not real" jazz with schlocky pop-jazz player Michael Brecker. Quote
Guy Berger Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago I remember when this thread was created 15 years ago. My opinion about Brecker’s playing has improved over that time. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.