The Magnificent Goldberg Posted August 17, 2012 Report Share Posted August 17, 2012 The little booklet has several pages of other releases, most of which are of no interest, but there are 3 (three) boxes each containing 8 (eight) LPs of LES BAXTER!!! (Oh, I see from AMazon UK there are now FOUR boxes!) What? Who would buy these? I mean, who really? We all know TTK likes him. I might try one, if I could find out which one has good chunks of Plas Johnson on it. I only saw one 2 CD set from EMI. Everything else was cheapo other labels. But this is the point, ain't it? To tempt the curious... See my post yesterday in the Vocalion thread. Fortysomethings like me love this stuff. Because when we were growing up it, and music like it, was always in the background, it's more evocative of our childhoods than the "cool" rock and roll we were supposed to like. Plus, our parents were aspirational, pop music fans. We didn't want to rebel against them like the previous generation did (and had to) against theirs; we wanted to emulate them. I don't think I understand what an aspirational pop music fan is or was in the seventies/eighties. No, I'm sure I don't. MG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasing the Korean Posted August 17, 2012 Report Share Posted August 17, 2012 (edited) MG, they have predictably spread Les Baxter's great exotica albums over the various volumes, mixing them with his schlocky pop albums, i.e. making the consumer buy more boxes to get the good stuff. Both of the Plas Johnson albums are on Volume 3, however, there is an existing EU public domain CD combining these two albums already (Jungle Jazz and African Jazz). Of the other albums in Volume 3, the gem is "The Sacred Idol," which is possibly my favorite Les Baxter exotica album, but I don't know if you would like it, MG. The other 5 albums are more generic 50s orchestral pop, nice if you like that kind of stuff, but hardly necessary if that's not your bag. So, In this case, I would simply spring for the twofer CD of Jungle Jazz and African Jazz. I have not actually heard that CD (I have the LPs), but the reviews seem to be positive and the transfers seem to be good, whatever the source. Edited August 17, 2012 by Teasing the Korean Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GA Russell Posted August 17, 2012 Report Share Posted August 17, 2012 A Google search for "chronogical" gives 1,530,000 hits. I'd say it's a word now! Definately. (why do about 40% of people think that's how you spell definitely?--actually, based on a Google comparison it's only about 10%) Pete, I think that they are thinking of "separately". Pete, I think that they are thinking of "separately". Maybe it's the sequence, but I can't figure out what you're responding to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete C Posted August 18, 2012 Report Share Posted August 18, 2012 I thought you were talking about individual CDs vs sets! But who is they? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Magnificent Goldberg Posted August 18, 2012 Report Share Posted August 18, 2012 MG, they have predictably spread Les Baxter's great exotica albums over the various volumes, mixing them with his schlocky pop albums, i.e. making the consumer buy more boxes to get the good stuff. Both of the Plas Johnson albums are on Volume 3, however, there is an existing EU public domain CD combining these two albums already (Jungle Jazz and African Jazz). Of the other albums in Volume 3, the gem is "The Sacred Idol," which is possibly my favorite Les Baxter exotica album, but I don't know if you would like it, MG. The other 5 albums are more generic 50s orchestral pop, nice if you like that kind of stuff, but hardly necessary if that's not your bag. So, In this case, I would simply spring for the twofer CD of Jungle Jazz and African Jazz. I have not actually heard that CD (I have the LPs), but the reviews seem to be positive and the transfers seem to be good, whatever the source. Thank you TTK, that's really very helpful. I'll shove them on my wish list so I don't forget next month. MG PS I did actually buy Martin Denny's 'Quiet village' back in '60 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete C Posted August 18, 2012 Report Share Posted August 18, 2012 OK, G.A., tell me if I finally got it: are you saying that the misspelling of definitely is some kind of false cognate from separately? If that's it, I don't see it. Nobody misspells that one separitely. Seperately is, however, a common misspellnig. What am I missing? Even I have to sometimes think twice about stationery and stationary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Nessa Posted August 18, 2012 Report Share Posted August 18, 2012 OK, G.A., tell me if I finally got it: are you saying that the misspelling of definitely is some kind of false cognate from separately? If that's it, I don't see it. Nobody misspells that one separitely. Seperately is, however, a common misspellnig. What am I missing? Even I have to sometimes think twice about stationery and stationary. Are you stationery when you have this problem? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete C Posted August 18, 2012 Report Share Posted August 18, 2012 Are you stationery when you have this problem? Yes, but I've written a letter of complaint on myself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crisp Posted August 19, 2012 Report Share Posted August 19, 2012 Plus, our parents were aspirational, pop music fans. We didn't want to rebel against them like the previous generation did (and had to) against theirs; we wanted to emulate them. I don't think I understand what an aspirational pop music fan is or was in the seventies/eighties. No, I'm sure I don't. There was a comma in there. They were (i) aspirational as opposed to confrontational and (ii) liked light, fun pop music as opposed to heavy, worthy rock. Two separate things but a common combination in suburban families. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Magnificent Goldberg Posted August 19, 2012 Report Share Posted August 19, 2012 Plus, our parents were aspirational, pop music fans. We didn't want to rebel against them like the previous generation did (and had to) against theirs; we wanted to emulate them. I don't think I understand what an aspirational pop music fan is or was in the seventies/eighties. No, I'm sure I don't. There was a comma in there. They were (i) aspirational as opposed to confrontational and (ii) liked light, fun pop music as opposed to heavy, worthy rock. Two separate things but a common combination in suburban families. Thanks, I'm beginning to get the hang of this now, but still not quite there. I think your parents were roughly of my own generation, so when you say they liked 'light, fun pop music as opposed to heavy, worthy rock', I guess that means Gary Glitter, T-Rex and Wizzard, as opposed to Cream, Led Zep and King Crimson. Or does it mean Manuel & the Music of the Mountains, the Big Ben Banjo Band and Val Doonican, as opposed to ALL the aforementioned? (If the latter is correct, I've got to say that I never, ever, met anyone like that in my own age group.) But I can't get 'aspirational as opposed to confrontational'. Aspirational isn't the opposite of confrontational. And I'm not sure of the relevance to musical taste of either term. Please explain a bit more. MG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king ubu Posted August 20, 2012 Report Share Posted August 20, 2012 Anyone needs some aspirin maybe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Head Man Posted August 20, 2012 Report Share Posted August 20, 2012 Anyone needs some aspirin maybe? Oh dear, me brain hurts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crisp Posted August 20, 2012 Report Share Posted August 20, 2012 I think your parents were roughly of my own generation, so when you say they liked 'light, fun pop music as opposed to heavy, worthy rock', I guess that means Gary Glitter, T-Rex and Wizzard, as opposed to Cream, Led Zep and King Crimson. Or does it mean Manuel & the Music of the Mountains, the Big Ben Banjo Band and Val Doonican, as opposed to ALL the aforementioned? (If the latter is correct, I've got to say that I never, ever, met anyone like that in my own age group.) But I can't get 'aspirational as opposed to confrontational'. Aspirational isn't the opposite of confrontational. And I'm not sure of the relevance to musical taste of either term. Please explain a bit more. The former. But aside from their music choices, there was all sorts of "easy listening" (hate the term by the way) woven into the fabric of popular culture, on films, TV, advertising, so it gets under your skin. Jazz entered my life by the same route. The Big Ben Banjo Band and Val Doonican was not their cup of tea, nor is it mine. But then music like that has little to do with Martin Denny, Jackie Gleason or funky KPM library music. It's about finding good music in unexpected places, not deliberately gravitating towards shit. Aspirational/confrontational probably isn't the right way to express what I mean. So I'm sorry for all the headaches. Entertainment versus art perhaps? Acceptance versus rebellion? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leroy Bad Posted August 20, 2012 Report Share Posted August 20, 2012 I got the Yusef Lateef box a few days ago. The sound quality is excellent, and I discovered I think what is a new favorite album. The Dreamer. It looks like outside another compilation this album has never has a stand alone CD release, but I think it's definitely worth it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jazzbo Posted August 20, 2012 Report Share Posted August 20, 2012 All the Savoy Lateef is excellent, in my opinion. Can't go wrong with Teefsky on Savoy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete C Posted August 20, 2012 Report Share Posted August 20, 2012 Can't go wrong with Teefsky on Savoy. Is that an official nickname, like Vonski? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidewinder Posted August 20, 2012 Report Share Posted August 20, 2012 (edited) the Big Ben Banjo Band and Val Doonican Two mentions of the Big Ben Banjo Band on this heavy-duty jazz site within the week ! Edited August 20, 2012 by sidewinder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jazzbo Posted August 20, 2012 Report Share Posted August 20, 2012 Can't go wrong with Teefsky on Savoy. Is that an official nickname, like Vonski? I know a few jazzers who call him that, first heard in private conversation with Danny D'Imperio. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete C Posted August 20, 2012 Report Share Posted August 20, 2012 first heard in private conversation with Danny D'Imperio. Not sure I'd consider that a trusted source... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king ubu Posted August 20, 2012 Report Share Posted August 20, 2012 Well Lonski, Couwski and Flurinski call him thusly, too - good 'nuff for me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jazzbo Posted August 20, 2012 Report Share Posted August 20, 2012 first heard in private conversation with Danny D'Imperio. Not sure I'd consider that a trusted source... I know the man pretty well and would differ. Anyway, he and a few others call him that and I like it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_forumlogo.png.a607ef20a6e0c299ab2aa6443aa1f32e.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.