Jump to content

Grant Green: under-estimated as Jazz artist, and Blue Note to blame?


Milestones

Recommended Posts

This is a question I pose in part because I was very young in the 60s (born in 1960) and became a jazz lover as a full adult and I barely knew about Green at all in my early years as a jazz guy.

I greatly enjoy Matador and Solid, which came out many years later soon after Grant Green's death.  Then there were the three records with Sonny Clark, which came out quite a bit later yet.  So you had this fine jazz side to Green that was hidden, while his releases at the time were more groove-based and often in an organ combo of some sort. Not that there weren't some good records in that mode, but I prefer Grant with more challenging material and sideman like Tyner, Henderson, and Hutcherson.

Blue Note has quite a history of holding some really good records in the can for long periods, and as a result tainted jazz history--and never more so than with Grant Green.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Blue Note was a two-man record company struggling to survive, anyone else would've just recorded the organ dates and not let him record so much.  I think the question is absurd on its face and more than a little myopic if not out 'n out narcissistic.  I'm just glad that he was able to record as much as he did and that the tapes survived.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Milestones said:

This is a question I pose in part because I was very young in the 60s (born in 1960) and became a jazz lover as a full adult and I barely knew about Green at all in my early years as a jazz guy.

I greatly enjoy Matador and Solid, which came out many years later soon after Grant Green's death.  Then there were the three records with Sonny Clark, which came out quite a bit later yet.  So you had this fine jazz side to Green that was hidden, while his releases at the time were more groove-based and often in an organ combo of some sort. Not that there weren't some good records in that mode, but I prefer Grant with more challenging material and sideman like Tyner, Henderson, and Hutcherson.

Blue Note has quite a history of holding some really good records in the can for long periods, and as a result tainted jazz history--and never more so than with Grant Green.

 

 

 

 

I think it's putting it a bit strong to say Blue Note "tainted" jazz history.  They put Grant Green on a lot of records.  This was a record label.  They made all sorts of decisions based on presumed profitability, personal esthetics, budgetary considerations, etc etc.  We cannot hold them criminally responsible for this or that decision about what and whom to release.  They gave musicians opportunities.  In some cases, yes, they failed to extend opportunities that in retrospect seem regrettable.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with Dana on this one.  IIRC, for example. those challenging early Andrew Hill records didn't sell at all.  As for Green's output, the albums with Larry Young are not your typical "organ dates" - they were plenty challenging for the era.  And 'Idle Moments', with Henderson/Hutcherson/Pearson, is widely considered a masterpiece.   They released him in trio format, in quartet with piano, etc.   Green's bad career move (in addition to being a heroin addict) was leaving BN for Verve, and he rectified that later on with his end of the decade return to BN.

Edited by felser
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Milestones said:

If not taint, then to give a somewhat inaccurate view.  

You would think it would be a good idea to put out records where McCoy Tyner and Elvin Jones are key members.  

That's hindsight.  Tyner had to still drive a cab to make ends meet, even while he was making those classic BN albums.  The sales figures on the initial runs of some of the BN records would startle you on how low they were.  My understanding is that Tina Brooks' classic 'True Blue' sold less than 1,000 copies on initial release, and that's why his other three albums stayed in the can for three decades.  Thank Michael Cuscuna for the insight we have into the BN catalog and the exposure for some of the artists there. 

3 minutes ago, JSngry said:

It was (almost) all very good. No complaints here.

Agreed.  the only ones that don't click for me are Feelin' The Spirit and Way Out West, and that's due to my (musical taste) aversion to the source material.  I even like the 70's albums on BN quite a bit, and play the heavily arranged ones frequently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Well, it was great to have (at the time) Idle Moments and Feelin' the Spirit--and others as well.

But there have been odd cases of really good music sitting in the can for 10+ years, with many other culprits besides Blue Note.
 

.....The truth is that so much jazz sells at such low volume, it's a wonder that the majority of artists (past and present) get record deals at all.

 

Edited by Milestones
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, felser said:

Agreed.  the only ones that don't click for me are Feelin' The Spirit and Way Out West, and that's due to my (musical taste) aversion to the source material. 

You have an aversion to spirituals AND cowboy songs?

What kind of an American are you, anyway?!?!?!?!?!?!?!????!!!!!!???????¿??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think GG was primarily a "licks" player.  He had a certain number (not that many) of riffs that he'd recycle in his solos.  I don't think he had the chops to be a full-time improvising jazz musician.  As for Idle Moments being such a great record, credit should probably go to Duke Pearson.

Don't get me wrong: I have most of what GG recorded and enjoy it, but I recognize his limitations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But does anybody play any differently than usual? Not really? They all had good days, but they all had lots of good days.

So maybe the point is that Blue Note screwed Grant Green by not having Duke Pearson involved in all of his records? Maybe, but not really.

I will say this, they got great players, picked wonderful material, arranged it well, had it rehearsed well, and then hit what was obviously a good vibe when it came time to roll tape.

What you can give Duke Pearson credit for (besides the charts) is not fucking up any of that, which is no mean feat in and of itself. It's its own art, really.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of wonderful records on BN.  Idle Moments is clearly one of the best of  them, and quite celebrated.  The length (an in-studio error if you read and believe the liner notes) and majesty of the title cut, the uniform strength of the other material, and the magnificent musicianship across the board make it stand out even in such stellar company.  It's special, not a weak or even mediocre moment.  And great cover art to complete the package.  It may be a typical classic period BN album, but when done right, that's an amazing pedigree.

Edited by felser
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, felser said:

Tyner had to still drive a cab to make ends meet, even while he was making those classic BN albums.  

IIRC, he applied for the job, but the cab company owner would not take it seriously. But I get your point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my case, during the times before Blue Note closed, I mean when I used to learn about all those great musicians, Blue Note was for me mainly the label where I found the music I was lookin for at that time: Wayne, Freddie, Herbie, Sam Rivers, Joe Henderson, McCoy, Elvin Jones, Tony Williams and my favourite Ornette Coleman and Don Cherry and Cecil Taylor records. So I was not at all aware about the many mainstream dates or the dates with organ, since I just was not listening to that kind of music when I was so young.

I discovered Green as late as the CD reissue boom of the 90´s. That was the first time I heard him and I think it was "Solid" with that version of "Ezzthetics" and so on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My personal favourite BN Grant Green is not the hard bop playing Green, but the funky Green, like Alive!, Live at the Lighthouse or Live At Club Mozambique, Green Is Beautiful is good too. I feel like he speaks his own language on them.  And "speaking his piece" is my definition of jazz.

Edited by mhatta
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My introduction to GG was when a DJ played 'Windjammer' from 'Live At The Lighthouse'. I then bought 'Idle Moments' so I quickly got both ends of his spectrum. Both work for me and both are definitely Jazz.

I've subsequently bought a good number across his stylistic spectrum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...