Yes. Hunter is better than that, for sure.
However once I dug into a bit of Hunter, I thought the 'Hammond Organ via guitar schtick' was not really anything more than mechanical. What I mean is, his approach basically divides the guitar between lower strings that function as extended bass line facility - while the supposed 'Larry Young' fourths angle - he takes doesn't really develop towards anything beyond the standard 'piano to guitar' compromises that any 'standard' six string tweaker is going to utilise and settle for anyway. So a George Van Eps of grease and quartal harmony he is not.
The other thing - is the chorus-y sound that supposedly apes the keyboard. I recently saw a Mike Stern masterclass over here, whereby Stern explained his own 'chorus' sound - as deployed - because he wanted to get away from the primary Guitar sound - and closer to a keyboard flow between the notes. And he believed the soft, wishy washy processed sound did this for him. Sometimes I wish these guys had just taken up keyboards and been done with it.
With someone like Metheny, I feel the processed tone is somehow critical to his actual lines and the physical dexterity of the way he plays, but for most others it is somehow diminishing.
As far as the heavy chorus sound goes, the only player I really liked with that sound is John Scofield, and he's scaled it back in recent years. Stern and John McLaughlin seem to favor that bland heavy chorus sound. But more predictable is Stern's playing and his recordings. I grew tired of it many years ago. I was also not crazy about McLaughlin's last CD, Now Here This. It all sounds the same from beginning to end, and it's a lousy recording/mix job.
On the contrary, Metheny sounds great on the new Book Of Angels CD. I find his own compositions more interesting than Zorn's, but at least he's still adventurous and trying new things.