More of a reflection of the other boards, I'll admit. They're really into 'enforced civility', if you know what I mean.
Go ahead and have us banned, but don't leave out all the rest of you that would have been banned pretty much long ago. There is a reason it was decided at some point on here that the political forum can't be seen without being a member, and members can opt-out of even seeing it.I said several times. I have no idea why the owners put up with all the harm many of you were doing to them monetarily. Oh yeah, the first person that should have been banned so long ago should have been Dan Gould. As little as I think of Mr. Irony (who should have been banned long ago)....he's not a semi-sociopath who regularly insults/threatens other members....but he's still here because he's a friend of the board's owner. Just how many members would be left if everyone that should have been banned long ago would be posting right now?
So if Danny jumps off the roof, does that mean you're going to do it to? Do you have any arguments that you didn't use when you were five?
And believe me, I have absolutely no influence on who get bans around here. Or (obviously) who gets reinstated after a ban. (NOT a dig at you, Blue Train; I'm sure longtimers know what asshat I'm referring to...)