How many games do you think Cleveland and LA would have won without their respective stars?
Of course you can.
Guy
You don't get it, that is exactly what I said, they score a ton, they would be nowhere without them, but Kobe and Lebron do not make their teams better, they just score and win for them....
and..
There are guys on the really bad teams that score a lot, so why not advocate for them to be Most Valuable also.
Because Lebron and Kobe are not under consideration for scoring a lot -- they are under consideration for making their teams a lot better. Do you really think that Cleveland would win 49-50 games without Lebron?
In case you mean that they don't make the other players on their team play better, why should that be relevant except insofar as it helps the team wins more games? This isn't the "best team player" award.
Given Boris Diaw's performance in Nash's absence, I withdraw my support for the guy. It's Kobe or LeBron.
Guy